Different Eras Have Developed Different Knowledge on the Subject of God

While three main scriptures and their religions have developed knowledge on the subject of God, other developments have occurred on this subject. In my blog dated 3/29/08, I identify a specific development on the subject of God. The personalities involved in this development are Abraham, Moses, Plato, Jesus Christ, Constantine, Nicholas of Cusa, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Cantor, LaRouche, and me. Since this development has been developing for more than 4000 years, the contributions of these personalities have created different eras of thought. In this blog, I want to focus on the era beginning with Leibniz (1646-1716) and his work to educate the masses.

A recent book on Leibniz is the 1982 translation of Remnant and Bennett on "New Essays on Human Understanding.’ Christian Wolff (1679-1754), a student of Leibniz, became a founder of the St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences in Russia. When returning to the University of Halle, Wolff became chancellor under Frederick II the Great (1712-1786).

When John Locke (1632-1704) and Queen Anne (1665-1714) passed on, Leibniz’s debate against Locke’s empiricism and his debate against Newton’s space and time universe would not occur and Leibniz would not become England’s Prime Minister. So, in the first two decades of the18th century, the debates between empiricism and rationalism had no leaders. The absence of leaders led to political action. Eventually, the people of France, Germany, and America began to prepare for trouble against British empiricism. The key contact person in America was Ben Franklin who traveled regularly to learn the rationalism of French and German philosophers and scientists.

What did Ben Franklin learn? He learned that British empiricism will build a despot, will apply the divine rights of kings, and will destroy rationalism. The US founders prevented the installation of British empiricism in America with the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. In the first paragraph, the statement ‘Laws of Nature and Nature’s God’ is a statement about the development of natural science and morality with pure reason.

The US Supreme Court is wrong when it says that the Declaration of Independence is not a law of the land. The Court was also wrong to support atheism beginning in 1967. Further, the US Department of Education and many school teachers are supporting the godless theory of evolutionary theory. This theory rejects pure reason and uses British empiricism. With the help of Sam Harris’ Project Reason, one might conclude that the increasing materialism in the USA will turn many young US citizens away from God? Should we soon expect the Crown of England to move its castle to the United States? Perhaps, we ought to hunt for another Ben Franklin.

God, Freedom, and Immortality are Scientific Concepts

In my last blog, I say that God, Freedom, and Immortality can be proven scientifically. To help understand such proofs, I used Plato’s negative thinking. Negative thinking is a new form of reasoning that rises above the logical principles used today.

So, in my proof of God, I begin by assuming that all things in the universe are finite. With this assumption, I can conclude that the origin of all finite things is ‘not finite.’ To bring logic with me, I move my mind into a higher level of thought and say that a ‘not finite thing’ actually identical to an ‘infinite thing,’ which seems to be a contrary thing of all finite things. But, an infinite thing is not the contrary of finite things.

By negating all finite things, a new logical principle has been revealed. This principle says those opposing concepts, such as infinite and finite, can ‘coexist.’ With this ne principle, I also found that the opposing concepts, infinite and finite, connect the higher world of God permanently to the lower world we call ‘the universe.’ Since God has no end, it is thus clear that the universe had no beginning and has no end. I also found that many opposing concepts also coexist in living things in the universe because opposing differences are never absolutely maximum. Opposing concepts, which are absolutely different, will be found only in the God-Universe connection. Accordingly, I expect to find non sequiturs associated only with nonliving things.

Since infinite things and finite things can coexist. I negate them and reveal the origin of all oppositions. This origin is a monotheistic God. With this simple proof of God, I also find that Freedom and Immortality are necessary concepts. Accordingly, I say that these necessary concepts are scientific

In my book, nonliving and living things are distinguished completely. So, I say that living things do not originate in nonliving things. But, I say that the freedom of living things is relative rather than absolute. So, I believe, that even though some behaviors of living things are complex, that they are still predictable. My belief is supported by the work of Kenneth Burke. On pages 191-220 of his book, The Philosophy of Literary Form, (click) Burke analyzes Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf. Burke predicts that Hitler’s psychological mind will use a scapegoat in order to build political power in Germany. Hitler’s scapegoat was the Jewish culture. Burke’s analysis was available in 1941. But, many Jews did not believe that the Holocaust would happen.

So, although many life scientists believe that human freedom denies predictions of human behavior. I say that human freedom is relative and is thus predictable. The mathematics and measurements of human behavior might be difficult to predict human behavior. But, I believe that a wise creator does not allow irrational thinking in any human being. So, man’s determinations of complex lines of reasoning and sensual data of human behavior can be expected to become more difficult as time passes.

God, Freedom, and Immortality

Project Reason (click) was founded by Sam Harris, who is the author of the New York Times Bestseller, The End of Faith. (click) Project Reason (Harris et al) is expecting to prove that faith is false. The origin of Harris’ thoughts seems to exist in the thoughts of Immanuel Kant. The thoughts of interest in this blog are found in the Preface to Second Edition of Kant’s famous book on Critique of Pure Reason. (click) In this preface, Kant says that reason can be extended only to objects of possible experience and thus cannot be extended to the concepts of God, Freedom, and Immortality. So, Harris and his atheistic friends on Project Reason expect to build lines of reasoning that will not consider the concepts of God, Freedom, and Immortality.

Since Project Reason rejects God, it is working against the USA, which is a nation under God. The US godly nation was authorized in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. God was also included in the US Constitution when the words ‘to form a more perfect Union’ in the Preamble. The degrees of perfection of the Union are known only through God and the Laws of Nature’s God because God is the only perfect standard for measuring degrees of perfection.

Kant’s critique of pure reason took man beyond the Schools of Christianity (scholasticism). But, man, who has no end, progresses continually. Today, man has gone beyond Kant. This line of reasoning includes Abraham, Moses, Plato, Jesus Christ, Constantine, Nicholas of Cusa, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Cantor, and LaRouche. Today, my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, (click) is adding to this long line of reasoning. My line of reasoning shows that God, Freedom, and Immortality are true scientifically. I also show that faith never ends because our knowledge of God can never be completed. So, I expect the Project Reason to fail.

Unless people begin to study this line of reasoning, a beautiful world peace will never develop and man will be warring continually.

Science is a Sure, But Uncompleted, Path of Truth

The US Constitution does not allow the US government to establish a religion in the United States because the field of religion has not developed a sure path of truth. At this time, only mathematics, logic, and science have developed sure paths of truth. However, none of these sure paths of truth are completed. Today, many scientists say that science can be completed. In my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, (click) I say that God exists. So, contrary to the beliefs of many mathematicians, logicians, and scientists, I say that no sure path of truth can be completed because God is the only perfect and complete thing. So, I believe that the work of mathematicians, logicians, and scientists will never end.

The many mathematicians, logicians, and scientists who do not agree with me reject God. By rejecting God, the sure path of truth of science is limited to empirical phenomena. So, their limited path of truth does not include metaphysics (pure reason). However, by limiting science to empirical phenomena, these mathematicians, logicians, and scientists are also rejecting the founding documents of the USA. Specifically, they are rejecting the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence and rejecting a phrase (to form a more perfect Union) in the Preamble of the US Constitution because God is the only standard of perfection. Interestingly, many US government agencies support and fund these mathematicians, logicians, and scientists. So, considerable confusion exists in the United States.

To support the limited sure path of truth in science for these mathematicians, logicians, and scientists, a team of atheists is forming an organization known as Project Reason. (click) This project can be expected to fail, as I will show in my next blog.

All Men Are Created Equal

God creates all humans equal. This statement means that God has given all humans the same potentials to develop a particular form of life. Thus, God does not create life forms such as electricians, nurses, pastors, criminals, presidents, etc. Nor does God use karmic forces to balance the different life forms that you have chosen from one life to the next life. Your life form has been influenced by many people after you were born. But, the life form you chose is determined only by you and the culture in which you live. Today, cultures have become a very significant factor in one’s choice of a life form.

I conclude that too few people in today’s free nations have become too powerful. This trend is forcing specific life form choices onto more humans. In the USA, for instances, I conclude that more and more US citizens are becoming new slaves to a class of US citizens who are materialists. So, when I wrote "The First Scientific Proof of God," I thought it necessary to compose the true story about man’s historical development of knowledge. This story, which begins 4.4 million years ago, shows that new knowledge can create new cultures and cause new cultural changes. But, cultures can also degenerate as a result of the growth of materialism, which has brought atheism to the USA in 1967.

In my book and on this website, I discuss new and modern knowledge. This new knowledge can cause new cultural changes in every nation. In the USA, this new knowledge can also eliminate the new form of US slavery I mentioned above. Fortunately, some of today’s materialists are recognizing the negativity of this new US slavery. Unfortunately, many US citizens still do not understand the real meaning of the statement ‘all men are created equal.’ I say that this lack of understanding is causing the US culture to degenerate morally. For instance, US women are beginning to display more and more of their parts. By doing this, they are also displaying their ignorance of God and created living things. Only nonliving things have parts to display.

On the Internet, Are Authors Devalued by Oppositions When Their Oppositions Cannot Devalue the Theory of an Author?

After my book (The First Scientific Proof of God) was published in June 2006, I began to present book reviews on related Amazon.com books. In time, I concluded that an unusual number of people were voting against my reviews of atheistic and theistic books. These votes devalue me rather than my theory of God. My newest book review on Hegel’s ‘Phenomenology of Spirit’ is also following this voting pattern by atheists. (click)

When Len Clements of Las Vagas mentioned the concept of the ‘last resort’ in a debate, I ask the question, "Since atheists are not trying to devalue my scientific proof of God, are they trying to devalue me and other authors as their last resort to save atheism?

I conclude that atheists are devaluing authors on Internet book stores as a ‘last resort’ of saving evolutionary theory and other support theories. However, I do not believe that ‘last resort’ is a common behavior of Americans. In the United States, where the development of a beautiful human mind is a possibility, ignorance should not lead to the ‘last resort’ behavior of devaluing hard-working authors.

The effort to devalue me is always the result of ignorance or the lack of knowledge. I express this belief because considerable knowledge is needed to value my modern theory of God. My theory of God developed with modern science and not ancient scriptures. Without knowledge of my God, a person will not know that philosophy has become a science, that the universe has no end, and that reincarnation has become a strong theory.

At this time, ignorance, rather than a conspiracy of atheists, is devaluing authors such as me. Unfortunately, devaluing authors are limiting the development of US morals and the daily use of the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. Perhaps, it is time to for the US Congress to eliminate the ‘last resort’ behavior on US Internet book stores.

Information to other authors: intelligent property is protected by law. And although freedom of speech seems to be unlimited, there are many limits, for instance, when yelling ‘fire’ in a theater when there is no fire or when book sales have been limited by ‘last resort’ efforts to devalue an author.

The United States Must Transform Its English Language into the English/German Language

The ugly English language, which guides the development of the US mind with Aristotelian logic, is changing the United States slowly into a philosophy typical of a third world nation. This change is confirmed by the poor performances of the US graded schools, the highly irrational performance of the US government, the continuing failures of the US science, the failure of religions to adapt to the modern theories of God, and the increasing acceptance of atheism and false scientific theories such as the Big Bang and biological evolutionary theory.

The need for this transformation can be understood better if US citizens know the history of Germany. The bad history of Germany began after WWI. The cause of this war has never been answered. Yet, the allies caused Germany to decay economically after WWI ended. This inhumane decay led to Hitler, who was an ugly-minded man who believed in the false evolutionary theory. This man produced WWII and the Holocaust. However, after WWII, the allies rebuilt the beautiful German mind, which had developed from 1700-1900.

The 1700-1900 period began with a major effort to educate the people who lived in Germany, Russia, and Austria. The leader of this effort was Gottfried Leibniz. He was expected to become Prime Minister of England under Queen Anne until Queen Anne was murdered. As Prime Minister under Leibniz, the Revolutionary was unnecessary and all US citizens would speak German today.

While England remained with the Aristotelian-guided English language, new and beautiful minds began to develop in Germany, Russia, and Austria in 1700. These new minds were guided by Plato’s ideas and the work of new thinkers in Germany, Russia, and Austria. These new thinkers lift their minds above logic where higher and higher syntheses are revealed from coexisting theses and antitheses. These higher syntheses were known by the founders of the USA and are expressed in the Declaration of Independence as the Laws of Nature and Nature’s God.

The transformation of our ugly English language into an English/German language is more important than the Iraq War. Since the next US president must be open-minded to recognize and make this transformation, I conclude that only Barack Obama will fill these shoes.

On My Proof of God

The comment from Len Clements of Las Vegas, NV below was posted today on my blog "Debating With Atheists, Evolutionists, or Sam Harris "( March 2, 2008). Can you answer Clements’ question? If you cannot devalue my proof of God, I will continue to expose the ugly English language and American mind with the hopes of improving American science and developing a beautiful mind for all Americans.

Is this comment by Lee Clements another sign that the book reviews of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, on Amazon.com form a conspiracy against the US Declaration of Independence?

LEN CLEMENTS' COMMENT
I originally came into this blog for the purpose of offering a rebuttal to Mr. Shollenberger's "proof of God" claim. However, after reading the other responses he has received I am now compelled to defend him!

I recall being taught in a college debate class (a long, long time ago) a technique that is to be used only as a "last resort" when it appears, the argument is lost. That is: If you can't diminish the credibility of your opposition's point, try to diminish the credibility of your opposition.

So far, this tactic is ALL that I have seen in response to Mr. Shollenberger's position. Are we really so desperate for a counter-point that this tactic needed to be employed here? Is our position so weak that we need to resort to petty semantic games and ironic grammatical attacks (considering the number of typos by his opposition). It's clear what his actual position is, regardless of how he has stated it.

Seriously. Can anyone here devalue George's point without devaluing George?

Len Clements
Las Vegas, NV

More on the Faulty Oath in the US Constitution

In yesterday’s blog, I showed that the minds of all US citizens were given the potential to develop the same beautiful minds that were developed by the founders of the USA. But, as I showed, this potential could not be achieved because the Constitution mandates an oath to swear support for the Constitution. But, this oath does not mandate governmental personnel support of the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. The error is a reality because my Senator of West Virginia, Robert Byrd, boosts of carrying the Constitution in his back pocket every day but does not also carry the first paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. The purpose of this blog is to discuss the negative effects of having no support of these two paragraphs by governmental personnel.


The first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence focuses on the Union, freedom, a creator God, self-evident truths, equality of man, and unalienable rights, the inclusion of the ‘Laws of Nature and Nature’s God’ in the first paragraph is critical to the development of a beautiful mind by US citizens. I discuss these two laws, the Laws of Nature and the Laws of Nature’s God, often in my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. (click) However, these two laws were discussed earlier by Friedrich Schiller (1759-1805) in his book, ‘On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters.’ Schiller was the poet of those US Germans who fought the Revolutionary War against England.


In his letters, Schiller gives us a clear meaning of the symbol of Nature. To him, Nature is not the origin of man as evolutionists say. Instead, he says, ‘Nature begins with Man no better than with the rest of her works: she acts for him where he cannot yet act as a free intelligence for himself (Third Letter).’ Essentially, Nature guides a person until a person becomes mature and moral. The Laws of Nature are thus necessary laws. I say that they are laws of the infrastructure that supports life. On the other hand, the Laws of Nature’s God are moral laws that every person must learn. Schiller’s aesthetic education is a method of learning moral laws. The moral laws free man from desire and lead to man’s perfection.


As seen, governments, educational systems, sciences, and religions seem to be confused about human life.

The Faulty Oath in the US Constitution

In yesterday’s blog, I show that ugly minds can become beautiful. I showed that beautiful minds can also become ugly. Then, I showed that the minds of the US founders were beautiful but that other US minds became ugly and led to a new nation that is very different from the founding nation. In this blog, I show that this US ugly mind developed due to a thinking error when the US government was improved by making the US Constitution.

The very beautiful minds of the founders of the USA can be seen clearly in the Declaration of Independence. However, their beautiful minds were not passed onto the people of the USA. What caused this terrible error? I conclude that this error was caused by our colonial congresspersons who did not understand the social contract theory of John Locke. Locke’s new political theory was installed by the founders.

Locke’s nation has two components, Society and Government. The US Society was authorized on July 4, 1776 in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. In the remaining words of the Declaration of Independence, a war against England is rationalized and authorized. On the same date, the Continental Congress became the US government.

The error will appear when the Continental Congress decided to make the US government more perfect. This improvement came into existence when the US Constitution became law on June 1, 1789. The Constitution expresses an oath that will affect all persons who are elected and appointed to the US government. This oath mandate elected or appointed persons to swear support for the Constitution of the United States. While the early congressional persons seem to say that this oath applies only to the Constitution and Locke’s Government, they failed to realize that this oath applies also to the Declaration of Independence and Locke’s Society. This error must be corrected. Otherwise, Locke’s social contract theory, Locke’s US Society, and the founding of the USA are destroyed and a completely new nation is formed illegally in the USA. The encroachments of foreign interests in the USA is evidence that a new nation is forming.

If this error is corrected, the morals of the people of the USA can be expected to rise to the morality of the founders of the USA. With this correction, the minds of all US citizens can be expected to become very beautiful.

Comparing the Ugly and Beautiful Political Minds of People in Different Nations

People who live in different nations develop different political minds. The ugliest political minds will be found in nations that accept a dictator. This kind of mind becomes more beautiful if the dictator is a philosopher-king, as defined by Plato. One example of a philosopher-king was Haile Sellassie of Ethiopia.

The political minds in a nation change drastically if a nation has a constitutional government. An example is the new government in Iraq. The political mind of a constitutional government becomes more beautiful if the nation also has a Declaration or Bill of Rights. Examples are France and the USA.

To my knowledge, only the USA has developed the most beautiful political mind. This beautiful mind was developed by the founders of the USA when they also developed a Constitution, a Bill of Rights, and a Declaration of Independence. However, this beautiful mind has been destroyed by those US citizens who became judges in the US Supreme Court and ruled that the authority of the Declaration of Independence was limited to the authority to ‘declare war against England.’ However, the minds of these judges became ugly when they did recognize that the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence authorized the USA to become a nation under God and a nation guided by Laws of Nature and Nature’s God and unalienable rights.

As seen, the political minds of the people of any nation can be ugly and remain that way. When the ugly mind does not change, the morals of the people continue to degenerate. However, the ugly political minds of people can become more and more beautiful, as the people of many nations have shown. But, I also show that the development of the most beautiful mind in the USA has degenerated almost immediately, by the irrational thinking of ugly-minded US Supreme Court judges. As expected, this mental degeneration lowered the US morals. Further, after the US Supreme Court ruled illegally in favor of atheism in 1967, the morals of the people of the USA could be expected to be lowered even more. This lower level of morals is being proven over the last 40 years. Is this degeneration of US morals a sign of new troubles ahead?

The Second Example of an Ugly Mind

As I have said on earlier blogs, the human mind is a God-created thing-in-itself, which contains possibilities that can be developed into actualities. These possibilities will unify opposing concepts such as art and science, reason and sense, feelings and facts, beauty and freedom, etc. I say that all ugly minds are thus caused by the lack of development of the inherent aesthetics that one will find in these dual possibilities. Opposed to me are the evolutionists who say that mind is merely images of the sensual activities of the brain.

So, this second example of an ugly mind is found in the one-sided mind of those evolutionists who promote biological evolutionary theory and reject God. To them, there is no useful art, no useful metaphysics, no useful feelings, no useful beauty, ... etc. Thus, the evolutionist must live on facts and their logic. However, evolutionists say that nonliving and living things coexist. But they cannot explain how living things are formed from nonliving things. This is why they must sell facts and stay away from any forms of proofs, such as my scientific proof of God.

As long as the people of the USA do not accept the first two paragraphs of the US Declaration of Independence as the authority of God in the USA, the US culture will remain divided and crime and other evils will continue to grow.

The First Example of an Ugly Mind

When humans learned how to speak to each other millions of years ago, they did not speak with each other perfectly. So, the early people had to develop an ability to understand what is being said. Nor did humans write perfectly after they leaned how to write 5,000 years ago. With writing, the ability to understand became more difficult because writings appeared in different languages and had to be translated. The truth is that speaking and writing can never be perfected completely because a monotheistic God and His creation will never end.

The ugliest mind I recognize today is the mind of people who believe that God destroys what He created, judges people, and gives them a new life, either in Heaven or Hell, where aging is eliminated. This ugliest mind was not recognized immediately by people because they were told by Western religious leaders that scriptures are perfect because they are dictated by God.

One can recognize this ugliest mind today because modern science has found the true infinity of God. This finding distinguishes God and His creation logically and perfectly. God’s true infinity reveals many new truths. For instance, we find that God is the greatest thing, is always the same God, and is the only thing in an infinite world. So, it is impossible for any finite thing to exist in God’s infinite world. God’s infinity also shows us that God does not dictate to any human. Consistence is telling us that an infinite God must appear in our finite world as a finite creature if he wants to give us information.

Many songs, poems, etc. are influencing the development of this ugliest mind.

Ugly Languages Create Ugly Minds

Evolutionists, who are usually atheists, would not agree with the statement "ugly languages create ugly minds" because they believe that the mind is being made slowly by Nature. They have this belief because they believe in Darwin’s evolutionary theory and the Big Bang theory of cosmologists, who reject the existence of God. So, if you are an evolutionist or an atheist, this blog will not be of interest.

If you believe in God but also believe in evolutionary theory or the Big Bang theory, you created an ugly mind because you used an ugly language that created contradictions in your mind. If you believe in God, you must believe that God has given you many gifts. One of these gifts is mind. However, some believers think wrongly when that say that a monotheistic God created their minds. This wrong thinking creates a personal God, eliminates our freedom to think, and confuses the nature of a monotheistic God.

As gifts from God, we are free to create our mind and body because such gifts from a monotheistic God are possibilities. It is up to you to make God’s gifts actual. Thus, in God, actuality precedes possibilities. But, in us, possibilities precede actualities. As seen, logical thinking about God is very different from the logic we use in our finite world.

So, do not agree with the evolutionists and atheists who say that the DNA creates your mind, that some people should be property of other people, and that some cultures are better than other cultures, as Hitler thought.

I say that a person creates his or her own mind. And, I say that the consciousness of your mind is created by the language you use. Thus, if you use an ugly language, you will create an ugly mind. I say that the English language is very ugly because it is based mostly in Aristotle’s concept definition and logic, Thus, I also say that the American mind is very ugly.

The Security Effects of the Flaws in the Ugly English Language

Yesterday, I showed that the field of science was forced away from God and onto a path to atheism by flaws in the ugly English language. However, many other institutions and individuals have also been forced onto the path of atheism by the same ugly language. So, a major effort is needed by the US government to correct this huge error.

The field of science will recognize its error fast if its people learn the history of the general law, sense data are primarily symbolic. This general law applies to all sciences. However, physical scientists are not taught this general law in colleges and universities because the meaning of a physical symbol, such as mass, time, length, etc., is defined by the many equations they found. In other words, physical scientists do not need to use Aristotle’s concept definition and logic to define the symbols in the laws of physics they found.

However, physical science must begin to use the general law of symbols because the current symbols found in today’s physical laws will not reveal the unknowns in the infinitely small (atomic regions) and the infinitely large (cosmology). To secure the people of the USA, the US government must wake up.

But, our life scientists cannot use the same laws of physics to study any living thing. It is thus wrong for life scientists to study humans and human behaviors as physical scientists. The security of life produced by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are thus highly flawed and is not securing the people of the USA against the negatives of disease. Today, the NIH and the FDA are merely creating murders of US citizens.

Clearly, the laissez-faire capitalism of the USA is not forming a more perfect Union, as required by the Constitution. Instead, this ugly form of capitalism is destroying the Union.

Security v. Peace and the Troublesome US Field of Science

Yesterday, I said that the true peace is not being sought. Thus, the activities of security agencies in most nations are increasing today in order to secure the people of a nation. The initial security of the people of the USA became real when the US founders applied the social contract theory of John Locke to create the USA. This contract theory requires that every US citizen give a portion of their ‘natural rights’ from God to the self-government of the USA. This self-government is known as a government of, by, and for all US citizens.

The increased activities of today’s security agencies are signs of trouble because more and more scientists and technologists are needed to secure a nation. This increase means that fewer scientists and technologists cab be used for independent scientific inquiries that could reveal new and important truths, such as the true world peace. So, all nations have entered a catch-22 circle. As this circle becomes larger and larger due to increasing needs for security, the more the true world peace becomes an illusion and the closer a major world war over depleting resources becomes a reality.

I say that the catch-22 circle is growing because today’s science stepped off of the path of truth about God and stepped onto the false path of atheism. The second step was created by US colleges and universities after they announced that their educational institution is ‘nonsectarian.’ With this single word, the study of God was removed from most of our colleges and universities.

US educational leaders are not thinking properly. A sect is a class of people who ‘practice’ a specific theology. A theology is the ‘study of’ God. Thus, many different theologies can exist but only some theologies are being practiced. The removal of the study of God from any US institution is illegal. This removal is a major US error because the USA is a nation under God, as stated in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence.

Worldwide Security and My Book

During my research career, I conducted research for the US military-industrial complex. I also conducted research for the US Department of Justice on US domestic security, which is called private security. I sense that my book on "The First Scientific Proof of God" is a ‘quiet and touchy subject.’ (Click)

My book is a quiet subject to those security agencies who have the responsibility to secure the people of a nation. It is also a touchy subject to these agencies because they did not expect to ever hear about a scientific proof of God. My past experiences in the field of security tell me that one cannot seek information from any security agency about my book or about their new activities related to the contents of my book because ‘silence’ is the basic principle of any security agency and their scientists. But, their silence is normal in the world we live today.

However, I believe that security agencies might fade away but only if the people of all nations develop a true peace. So it is important for the people in all nations persuade each other to create this kind of world peace. If this true world peace does not develop, one can expect continuous world events such as ghetto wars, human deaths on 9/11, suicide bombing, biological wars, worldwide terrorism, family social conflicts, new diseases, increasing poverty and crime, etc.

However, I believe that only a free nation can lead the people throughout the world into a true peace. The USA can lead the people because it has a public sector (Government) and a private sector (Society). This duality is required in Locke’s social contract theory. But, this duality became irrational when the US Supreme Court misinterpreted Locke’s social contract theory and does not consider the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence as law. It is clear that Congress must reform the US Supreme Court.

The Future Life of My Book, "The First Scientific Proof of God"

In 2006, my book about God, intelligent design, and the creation shocked many scientists and logicians. This shock can be seen in and around August 2006 and May 2007 on my blogging on this website. These nonbelievers thought that God is nonexistence beginning in 1967 after the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of atheism and Madelyn O' Hair's request to remove praying from public schools. Because of this shock, I believe that the acceptance of my book will require more life and promotion. With this additional time, people will be convinced that theology and religion are sciences.

So, I will give the paperback version three more years of life beginning in June 2008. This means that I will not continue the more expensive hardcover version. So, if you want a hardcover copy, you must buy by June 8, 2008.

Thanks go to those futurists who already purchased my book.

The Ugly English Language and Politics

In my book on The First Scientific Proof of God and on my blogging effort on this website, I have said often that the English language is ugly because it has very serious flaws. Since the human mind is created by our talking languages, scientific languages, and feelings, these flaws build the different ways a person thinks and acts. Many of these flaws are created by the misuse of Aristotle’s logical reasoning.

The current US political system, which will identify the next US President, is now entering the final phase where many negatives will be heard. Troubles already exist with the logical symbolic pairs black/white and male/female. The symbols become problematic when a person gives them a meaning and makes one or more sentences. The early victim of this logic in the political system is Geraldine A. Ferraro. (click).

Religious Efforts to Unify Science and Religion Are Too Slow

On 9/16/07 I posted a blog on the subject, "Religious Mysteries Come and Go." There, I said that religious mysteries do not remain forever. So, I concluded that I must treat religion as a science and treat religious mysteries merely as scientific ‘unknowns.’ I also said the separation between Religion and Science must be overcome and that this separation is being mended by the Roman Catholic Church. I recognized this new light of the Roman Catholic Church because Pope John Paul II had apologized for Galileo’s imprisonment and because Pope Benedict seemed to be continuing John Paul’s thoughts.

After the assassination of my character by Patty Mortimer and Donald Miller recently, it is obvious to me that the new light of the Roman Catholic Church, including the new lights of Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict, is not guiding some members of the Roman Catholic church. Yet, the US press has told me often that the theological and religious thought of Pope Benedict, I, and other scientists are consistence. Apparently, Patty, Donald, and the American Cusanus Society are not informed of the lights of today’s Catholicism when they read my material.

The Roman Catholic Church and other religions are advancing in their effort to reunite Science and Religion. But, the same effort by scientists is much faster, as the blogs on my website and my book show. So, churches, temples, and mosques must speed up their effort on this reunification. Otherwise, their members will continue to assassinate the characters of scientists wrongly. The character assassination of any scientist, theologian, or religious leader is not the way to reunify Science and Religion.

Has the Inquisition Ended?

On February 29, 2008, Barbie Nadeau of Newsweek (click) tells us about the new effort of the Roman Catholic Church to help us forget the past events of the Inquisition. The purpose of the Inquisition was to increase the power of the Vatican. Heretics were identified, tortured, and burned at the stake. Also, books were banned. Currently, the Vatican is displaying things to show that the Inquisition represented turmoil in the church.

But, this exhibition is not the first show. In 2004, the Vatican published an 800-page report saying that only 1.8 percent were executed. Pope John Paul II referred to the 700-year effort against heresy as a "tormented phase" and the "greatest error in the church's history." The show will last only weeks.

Based on the recent character assassination of me by Patty Mortimer and Donald Miller, and past character assassinations of me by others, is a book burning effort still continuing on the Internet by the Roman Catholic Church and other power-seeking organizations?

What Is the US Department of Education Doing to Your Children, I?

Over the last week or so, I have been having a discussion with Patty Mortimer, a teacher at Jefferson High School in Boston. She said that I do not understand Popper’s criterion on falsifiability and that I am a coward, dishonest, sinful, amateur, and should write in German if I think the English language is ugly. Her words were similar to the atheists I debated over the last year and half. Of interest to me, she never spoke of the work of Gottfried Leibniz and two kings and queens who develop ed the talking languages of Germany, Austria, and Russia so that the masses would become educated. The development of the German language was studied by Aldo Scaglione. (See "The theory of German Word Order from the Renaissance to the Present," 1981, Univ. of Minnesota Press.) So, I conclude that she does not know the origin of Germany’s Platonic idealism, classical music and poetry, the great 19th century progress of German mathematics, and the transfer of German rocket scientists to help the USA fight the Cold War against the Soviet Union.

However, I became very interested when Patty said that one of her students said that "Mister Shollenberger is not thinking clearly. Categories are used to describe reality as it is, they don’t create reality. " In my response I said, "The student is saying that logical categories are used to describe reality. This is exactly how today's atheistic logicians describe reality. I say that the human mind, not logical categories, describe realities. " Obviously, the words of this student must be the teaching at Jefferson High School. But, what is the origin of the student’s wrongful thinking other than at the US Department of Education and its English Fluency and No Child Left Behind programs? (click)

So, when the US Supreme Court removed God from the USA, by not including the Declaration of Independence in the body of US laws, it confused every agency in the US government. But, this confusion eventually turns only into governmental lies. Specifically, the Department of Education is only teaching the English language. It does not remove the many flaws that now exist in the English language, And it does not tell you that all children, even those in the ‘No Child Left Behind’ program, are being taught to become atheists. Are American children saying ‘Bye’ to the last believers in God when they pass on ? Wake up parents.

Crime Must be Prevented: By Developing the Mind With Precise Symbols

Today, the US government is operated mostly by the Democratic and Republican parties. On the crime problem, both parties are stuck in the mud. For instance, the Democrats believe that criminals should be imprisoned and corrected. But, the Republicans believe that criminals should be imprisoned and the keys be thrown away. The Democratic belief has its origin in a theory that says crime is caused by external factors such as poverty.. The Republican belief has its origin in another theory that says crime is caused by birth factors such as DNA. I say that both parties are wrong.

I say that crime originates in the potentials that humans have received from God. Thus, humans, not God, are the causes of crime. When I sought the causes of crime, I found only one cause. This cause is the human mind and the symbols and symbolic languages that man create and define. So, I conclude that crime can be reduced and eliminated only by perfecting the symbols and symbolic languages we use. This means that crime must be prevented.
In the USA today, the US Supreme Court has denied the Declaration of Independence as a law. This denial has removed God from the USA. Yet, the authority of God was in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. Without God, my theory of crime cannot be proven and practiced. So, US Supreme Court created a situation that blocks the prevention of crime and opens the continuous rise of crime.

On the TV evening news every night, the people of the USA see this continuous rise of crime and their causes. They are beginning to see that crime cannot be stopped politically. And they might also be seeing that these causes are originating in a government that was not founded by the American colonists and the Declaration of Independence and US Constitution . Clearly, the US government is no longer a government of, by, and for the people. When are US citizens going to vote and act smartly?

Evidence of the Ugly English Language

After I learned about the 1920 linguistic discovery, that sense data are primarily symbolic, I concluded that my theory on the root cause of crime at the US Department of Justice was correct. At Justice, I concluded that the cause of crime is to be found in the flaws of ugly languages that man uses. Later, I received support of my theory by the teaching of Jesus Christ at Mark 7:23. I discussed this crime theory in pgs. 160-165 of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. Today, we can thus empty all prisons and build a beautiful world. Without improving our ugly languages, crime will continue to increase and will force people to act themselves against the criminal, eventually with guns. In this respect, the US government is securing its people against foreign enemies but not against domestic enemies.

Evidence that every national talking language is ugly exists in every science. For instance, one notices that the physical sciences have found a set of symbols that relate to each other precisely because of their precise meaning. These symbols form physical laws that never change. In Part I (Ch. 5) of my book, I discuss these symbols in detail. However, these physical laws seem to apply only to nonliving things and then only in places where we can live. So, they don’t seem to apply to the infinitely large (cosmology) and the infinitely small (atoms). The extent of our scientific knowledge of the philosophy of symbolism is thus limited to the places we live.

Unfortunately, our life scientists are trying to apply these highly limited physical laws to every living thing. I say that this application is wrong, wasteful, and dangerous because humans and the lower animals can be killed unnecessarily. This application must be stopped because nonliving and living things are very different things-in-themselves. For instance, the positive nature of nonliving and living things can produce very different unwanted negatives.

I say that scientists have failed to develop the physical sciences beyond what I discussed above because they will not consider my scientific proof of God. They don’t realize that God is a necessary being for the universe. Instead, they have become atheists, have rejected metaphysics, and have accepted the half-world scenario, the only world that empirical data alone can produce. By becoming atheists, they are denying the authority in the Declaration of Independence, which mandates that the USA is a nation under God.

Thus, one can find considerable evidence showing that the ugly English language exists and can be improved.

All Talking Languages Are Ugly

Although I speak about the ugly English language often, I speak about the ugly English language because I live in the USA and want to improve the language I use. The truth is that the talking language in every nation is ugly. All talking languages are ugly because man develops them.

I learned about this ugliness when I was studying the 15th century work of Nicholas of Cusa. His work warns us about the uncertainties of the symbols that fills our talking languages with junk. To overcome these uncertainties, he shifted to the certainty of mathematics when he wanted to express a certainty.

However, it took more than 500 years for the Western world to learn about the true nature of our talking languages. Not until 1941 will we learn that a major discovery was made independently by a number of linguists. Susanne Langer tells us about this discovery in "Philosophy in a New Key." On p. 21, she tells us that ‘our sense data are primarily symbolic.’ But, in his book on the "Phenomenology of Spirit (1807), Friedrich Hegel discovered that sense certainty cannot be reached by languages.

With these two discoveries, how can one accept the "Intuitive Thinking as a Spiritual Path" proposed by Rudolf Steiner? How can one accept the free flow of logic into our talk language? How can one expect to build true sciences based on sensual data alone and without metaphysics? How can one progress in science without Popper’s falsifiability criterion that pushes man into the future and its unknowns? And how can one age and only hope to die so they can go to a heaven that does not exist?

Hopefully, others wake up as I did.

My Challenges of Science, Theology, and Religion

Comments on my recent blogs are saying that I have become stubborn and do not admit easily that I am wrong. I conclude that people are stubborn if they are unprepared to discuss a scientific subject. I disagree with these comments because I challenge many fields of thought. To the maker of comments, I might be stubborn. But, people who know my challenges say that I am very different, but not stubborn.

After finding the first scientific proof of God, I was challenged to unify science, theology, and religion. The true field of science came to me after I recognized that the theory of God must be removed from the field of religion. With this removal, religion is limited to the ‘practice’ of any‘theory of God. I also recognized the need to isolate the theory of God in the field of theology because I see theology as a part of science. But, I also recognized that the life sciences must be freed from the physical sciences so that ‘life’ can be studied independently. So, my challenge is to unify theology, physical science, and life sciences so that they can seek truths using the same two-step scientific method of proof. This two-step method is simple. It begins with a ‘discovery"(empirical data) and ends with a ‘demonstration’ (a sufficient reason that explains the data).

I also challenge the failures of the physical sciences and the life sciences. The physical sciences are not finding the fundamental stuff (or matter) of the universe. Nor are they finding any sound cosmological theory. Further, I do not believe that the return to the concept ‘spacetime’ will help. On the other hand, the life sciences, because they are using physical theories, are also failing. I do not accept the increasing rate of cancer and many other unsolved human medical problems. I conclude that the failures of the physical sciences and life sciences have the same cause, the rejection of God as the origin of the universe. Do I challenge my representatives in Washinton, business and industry, economists, religions, Hollywood, etc.? Yes.

If you decide to challenge my challenges, be prepared for my responses could have a short fuse for people who don’t do their homework thoroughly. My challenges are also pointing to the colleges and universities. They have become institutionalized and stuck in the mus, like our religions, and are of little help to guide the future of a nation or a family.

Popper and His Falsifiability Criterion

Recently, readers have challenged my improper use of Popper's Falsifiability Criterion. I have used this criterion on my theory of God, which uses observed things and God as their origin. y, I used the Yang-Mills theory in the field of physics as an opposing theory that could destroy my theory of God if the observed physical particles attain absolute freedom. Currently, this freedom is still absence. So, my theory of God is falsified by empirical data. on physical particles. Below is the information on Popper is supplied by my Encyclopedia Britannica 2006.

Information
Popper, Sir Karl was born July 28, 1902, Vienna, Austria and died Sept. 17, 1994, Croydon, Greater London, England. he was a philosopher of natural and social science who subscribed to antideterminist metaphysics, believing that knowledge evolves from experience of the mind.

Although his first book, Logik der Forschung (1934; The Logic of Scientific Discovery), was published by the Vienna Circle of logical positivists, Popper rejected their inductive empiricism and developmental historic ism. After studying mathematics, physics, and psychology at the University of Vienna, he taught philosophy at Canterbury University College, New Zealand (1937–45). In 1945 he became a reader in logic at the London School of Economics, and he served there as professor of logic and scientific method from 1949 until his retirement in 1969.
Popper's principal contribution to the philosophy of science rests on his rejection of the inductive method in the empirical sciences. According to this traditional view, a scientific hypothesis may be tested and verified by obtaining the repeated outcome of substantiating observations. As the Scottish empiricist David Hume had shown, however, only an infinite number of such confirming results could prove the theory correct. Popper argued instead that hypotheses are deductively validated by what he called the "falsifiability criterion." Under this method, a scientist seeks to discover an observed exception to his postulated rule. The absence of contradictory evidence thereby becomes corroboration of his theory. According to Popper, such pseudosciences as astrology, metaphysics, Marxist history, and Freudian psychoanalysis are not empirical sciences, because of their failure to adhere to the principle of falsifiability.

Popper's later works include The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945), The Poverty of Historic ism (1957), and Postscript to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, 3 vol. (1981–82). He was knighted in 1965.

The United States of America Must Change Before It Can Lead Any Nation into a New Life

Although the USA has the necessary founding documents to lead the people of the world to a new life, the USA must change by reinitializing the original founding documents before world leadership becomes a possibility for the people of USA.

Many US citizens do not know that the original founding documents of the USA were redefined by the Supreme Court when it did not include the Declaration of Independence in the body of US laws. I noticed power of this definition when I learned that my senator, Robert Byrd, boasted that he carries the US Constitution in his pocket. Earlier, after studying the Declaration of Independence, I concluded that my senator should be carrying the Declaration of Independence also because it has two legal authorities --- the legalization of God and the legalization of a war with England.

Today, many US citizens do not realize that this redefinition by the Supreme Court changed the USA from a nation under God to a nation that has many ungodly citizens who have become unbelievably rich or have become liars, bandits, slave masters, power-seekers, war-mongers, atheists, molesters, and criminals. If the Declaration of Independence is not become a part of the body of US laws, these ungodly citizens will eventually seize full control of the US government and create a very ugly nation. Ungodly citizens cannot secure a nation at all and certainly cannot lead the people of any nation.

As I say in my book, The First Scientific Proof of God (click), this redefinition began after our founding fathers passed on and after Abe Lincoln was assassinated. After Lincoln was gone, the principle of ‘anything goes’ began to guide the weak-spirited minds of some US citizens who quietly developed the ugly nation we have tody. Today, many foreigners know of this ugliness and are no longer our warring allies.

The United States of America: The Only Nation That Can Lead the Other Nations into a New Life on Planet Earth

In yesterday’s blog, I show US citizens how they can debate and win the statement— that God exists. Since modern science has now clarified the monotheistic nature of God, US citizens can also debate and win the statement— that only one religion is possible under God. So, never before have the citizens of the United States been in the unique position to lead all nations into a new form of world peace.

This unique position is established by the unique founding documents of the United states of America, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The Declaration of Independence defines the USA as a ‘society’ under God and the Constitution defines the government of this society as a ‘self governing’ organization.

In yesterday’s blog, I say that the US Declaration of Independence a declaration of war with England. But, the Declaration of Independence is more than a declaration of war. As I have shown on this website and in my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. A declaration of independence is not a declaration of freedom. Freedom requires no God and comes in many forms, as they do in godless/communist nations.

A declaration of independence requires God, that is, a greatest God. A greatest God is necessary because things for the universe must be created out of nothing. To declare independence, God must thus create things out of nothing. A declaration of independence means that a greatest God mus give every created thing ‘independence.’ This independence is needed so that every created thing is a thing-in-itself. So, a greatest God insures that no two crated things will ever be or become identical. Thus, when you feel free, you can feel some of the freedoms a government gives you through laws. But, when you feel free, you can also feel the independence that God gave you.

The founding documents of the USA places the people of the United States in a unique position to lead the world to a new form of life and peace.

Debating With Atheists, Evolutionists, or Sam Harris

If you are a parent of school children or a religious leader and will be involved in a debate with atheists, evolutionists, or Sam Harris, you must be prepared because they are well prepared to pull the wool over your eyes and the eyes of the audience. Your oppositions have six common beliefs as follows:

1. That God does not exist.
2. That everything came from an exploding physical particle.
3. That the universe ends.
4. That mind represents differing images of sensations.
5. That life came from nonliving physical matter.
6. That all living things evolved from an ancestor.

None of these beliefs have ever been proven scientifically, have not been falsified, and will never be proven.

A believer requires only two beliefs in order to be successful in a debate with atheists, evolutionists, and Sam Harris. These two beliefs are as follows:

1. That the USA is a nation under God.
2. That God exists.

However, your two beliefs can be proven scientifically. For instance, the belief that the USA is a nation under God is proven in the first two paragraphs of the US Declaration of Independence and in the Preamble of the US Constitution. The two paragraphs in the Declaration of Independence say,

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —— That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. —— Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world."

The Preamble of the US Constitution says,

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, ..."

The words "to form a more perfect Union" can be measured scientifically only with a "perfection standard." The only perfection standard is God, who is the only perfect thing that man has identified scientifically.

The belief that God exists is proven on page 6 of my book, The First Scientific Proof of God. The statement of proof on this page says, "all finite things are originated by an infinite thing." The only finite thing that man has found is in the universe and the only infinite thing that man has found is God.

Errors in My Book

My book is self-published. The self-publisher is authorhouse. (click) Sales continue.

But, when my book was published, either authorhouse's computer or an employee of authorhouse made two changes in my book’s WordPerfect text. These errors are as follows:

1. On page 38, my words antinomies and Antinomy were changed to antibodies and Antibody respectively.

2. On pages 45, 46, and 50, the name Krantz was changed to Crayons.

If you find any other errors, I will post them here for others.

More Opinions on Sam Harris and Neurology

Sam Harris’s book on The End of Faith says that faith impedes the development of man’s reasoning skills and that religious differences, which often lead to wars, cannot coexist indefinitely. To sell this book, Harris publishes articles and debates with believers in God. Now, he is opening a website on The Reason Project. Advisors are personalities such as Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Rebecca Goldstein, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Steven Pinker, Ibn Warraq, and Steven Weinberg. These personalities advisors are scientists, evolutionists, atheists, and religious reformers.

Clearly, Harris’ research is physical. Thus, he seems to have no spiritual interests. If he has no spiritual intersts, he sees mind as a shadow of the brain. Thus, he does not view the mind as a metaphysical thing, a thing-in-itself, a soul, or a Spirit. His view of mind is thus based on logical thoughts. For instance, he uses the opposing concepts, assent and dissent and relates them tothe opposing concepts, certainty and uncertainty. The use of logic is a sign of the work of an atheistic scientist, who is unaware that God is hidden by logic. On the other hand, a godly scientist will use logic only to structure a created thing of qualities. Once structured, the contents of a created thing can be known only through its variable qualities that change by degrees. Leaping gaps with logical reasoning has always been an idea unique to the atheistic Marxists. Apparently, Marxism is expanding in the USA.

I also disagree with Harris on his beliefs about religious differences. Religious differences have caused religious progress because religious progress is evident. Only recently, do we find that religions are admitting their errors. The emergence of modern science was necessary in this process. With modern science, today’s religions are now learning many new truths about a monotheistic God.

Harris is unnecessarily rocking the ‘boat of religion,’ which will be getting stronger and stronger every day.