How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, VII

In order to prevent another civil war in the USA, the field of politics must be reformed so that our political parties can serve the 'one People' of the USA better. At this time two major parties, the Democrats and Republicans, are controlling the field of politics. Today, the Democratic party is said to behave based on liberalism (click) whereas the Republican party is said to behave based on conservatism (click).

I conclude that Russell Kirk separates these two parties best when he says that a liberal is a lover of ideologies whereas a conservative negates ideologies. Kirk's differences seem to be confirmed by the growth of government under liberalism whereas the conservative seeks a limited government. But other people say that the 'poor class' of people are found mostly in the Democratic party whereas the Republicans are mostly members of the 'rich class.'

Both parties stress the importance of human freedom. Thus, both parties should respect the Declaration of Independence. However,, I conclude that the Republican party, but not the Democratic party, removed the Declaration of Independence as a law in the USA. I make this statement because the conservatives follow Edmund Burke of England, who speaks of 'constitutional law' but not of 'independence law.' The U.S. laws of independence are found in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence.

Since liberalism and conservatism can't be distinguished precisely, their differences are very different and thus difficult to provide service to the 'one People' of the USA . Because of these differences, the field of politics is establishing conditions that can lead to another civil war.

When Jesus Christ spoke of the darkening of our sun in Matt. Ch.24, he was speaking about a fact that was coming. Don't the leaders on nations read the history of man's thoughts? Are the people of all nations to wait for the sun to darken before they start to think about this new human problem? Or should all of these people determine now when the sun will actually darken? If the liberals and conservatives do not think about the future, no human being should become a member of these rather ignorant political parties. Is JFK going to be our last futuristic leader in the U.S. government?

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, VI

In closing yesterday's blog I said "With the failure of Kant to reconcile the rationalists and empiricists, the field of philosophy degenerated." The degeneration of the field of philosophy would exist until the 1920s when many Western world linguists discovered that sensual data are primarily symbolic. But information on this discovery was not distributed widely until Susanne K. Langer (1895-1985) published 'Philosophy In a New Key" in 1942.

In 1952, life scientists began to discuss symbols at the Thirteenth Symposium of the Conference of Science, Philosophy, and Religion at Columbia University. In 1969, Herbert Blumer coined the term "symbolic interactionism" and led to the Society for the Study of Symbolic Interaction (SSSI). (click) Unfortunately, the SSSI has not gained recognition.

Why is the philosophy of symbolism not developing and why is SSSI a failure? It has been ninty years since the discovery of symbols was made and nothing has been achieved. The answer to these two questions is very clear to any person who knows that the field of philosophy is being filled with philosophers who reject the U.S. founding documents, reject the existence of God, and support materialism and atheism.

Thus, unless the field of philosophy in colleges, universities, and workplaces is turned toward God immediately, the development of a new form of slavery and the development of a civil war can be expected.

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, V

In order to prevent another civil war in the USA, the field of philosophy must be reformed so our philosophers can serve the 'one People' mentioned in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Philosophy, which means the love of wisdom, deals today with the study on subjects such as existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. See history? (click) In this blog, our history will focus on the work of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) and the decisions made by our founders in 1776.

The work of Kant dealt with the failure of of Plato and Aristotle to reconcile their differences. Plato argued that higher ideas can not be completed whereas Aristotle thought that logic can be completed. With the success of Euclidean geometry and the inability of the neoPlatonists to reconcile Plato's and Aristotle's differences, Aristotle logic won control of human life during the Middle Ages until the 14th century Renaissance and Plato's writings were found in an estate. By this time Aristotle's logic had been failing and the Western world again became confused. Then, when Kant appeared, he failed to reconcile the Western world rationalists (the Platonists) and empiricists (the Aristoteleans).

But the USA founders did not wait for Kant's major book on the 'Critique of Pure Reason' in 1778. They knew the forthcoming power of England's Royal Society and its empiricists. So when the founders prepared the Declaration of Independence and Constitution, their thoughts were focused on God in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration. The words in these two paragraphs are pointing directly at God, Plato, and a world that has no end. Thus, all proposals for a world theory without a God in the USA are violating the U.S. founding documents.

With the failure of Kant to reconcile the rationalists and empiricists, the field of philosophy degenerated.

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, IV

In order to prevent another civil war in the USA, the colleges and universities must be reformed so they serve the 'one People' mentioned both in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The 'one People' means a Union in which all members depend on each other. Since a Union cannot stand still, it must progress continually with long term goals.

Some years ago, I contacted President William Brody of my university, Johns Hopkins. I told him that the University Press did not consider my book on God. I asked him whether the University funded studies on the theory of God. He said no because the the university is nonsectarian. I told him that the concept nonsectarian applies to the field of religion and that the University could study God. When President Brody returned my e-mail, he said that he understands my point. I am sure that all colleges and universities believe that nonsectarian includes religion and theology.

Today, most colleges and universities believe that theology is the same field of thought as religion. However, theology is the study of God whereas religion is the practice of a specific theology. Many colleges and universities in the USA have thus divided their students. But this division is small compared to the damage that they have done to the Union.

My research shows that a belief in God and a belief in the Big Bang theory requires two very different sciences. Thus, our colleges and universities are focusing their teachings of science and morality in favor of the Big Bang theory. Based on the founding documents of the USA,these colleges and universities are thus acting unlawfully.

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, III

In order to prevent another civil war in the USA, the U.S. Congress must obey the U.S. Constitution. Today, Congress is not obeying a major mandate of the Constitution. By not obeying this major mandate, Congress has been allowed to violate other constitutional mandates and disregard completely the Declaration of Independence. The major mandate that Congress does not obey contain the following words in the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution: "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, etc."

Note. The words 'the People' also appear in the first statement of the Declaration of Independence: "When in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to ....." This is a sign that the Declaration and the Constitution form a single law. It is thus clear that the phrase, 'the People,' means that the USA is a Union. However, the members of a 'union of people' cannot be absolutely free, otherwise they cannot depend on each other. This meaning of Union has been the same in the self government of the Jews, in the teachings of Jesus Christ, and in the modern work of Kant and Hegel. So, Union is not a free-for-all.

In order to form a perfect Union, the Congress must change. Like scientists who use measuring standard, Congress must use a measuring standard that measures perfections of the Union. Since God is the only perfect thing, all measurements of the Union must be godly. Such godly measurements can be made only if the Union establishes godly goals and 'the People' measures the advancements.'

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, II

In order to prevent another civil war in the USA, the fields of science and mathematics must change. Today, these fields are developing closed-minded workers and students. For instance, these fields have promoted materialism. But materialism hides and then removes the active God of theism from the thoughts of many American mathematicians and scientists and lowers our international ranking in the fields of mathematics and science.

The God of theism was identified by Ralph Cudworth (1617–1688), an English philosopher and leader of Cambridge's Platonism in England. In 1678, he published "The True Intellectual System of the Universe." This book rejects 'determinism.' But, materialism accepts determinism, when it says that man's knowledge of the universe can be completed. Below, I show that materialism and determination reject the U.S. Declaration of Independence and freedom. how can any U.S. citizen accept materialism and Darwin's evolutionary theory?

Cudworth's thoughts stand on three principles; (1) the existence of God; (2) the naturalness of moral distinctions; and (3) the reality of human freedom. It is through Cudworth and his daughter, Lady Masham, that one can connect Cudworth's Platonism to Gottfried Leibniz's New System and Monadology and my book, 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' Interestingly, materialism rejects human freedom since it requires all things to be mechanical machines.

Cudworth's principle on 'the naturalness of moral distinctions' is found in the Declaration of Independence as part of the phrase 'Laws of Nature and Nature's God.' So, here is more evidence that the Declaration of Independence should be a U.S. law. This is also more evidence that the founding of the USA was changed unlawfully by the U.S. government.

Since deism and atheism oppose theism, and deism and atheism support materialism, it is clear that materialism must be removed from the USA to prevent another civil war.

How Can We Prevent Another Civil War in the USA?, I

A second civil war in the USA can be prevented id all citizens of the USA rebuild the 'one people' mandated by the Declaration of Independence. This can be done easily if the U.S. Supreme Court recognizes that dead Supreme Court judges cannot control the USA and that dead judges made an error when they ruled that the Declaration the Independence was not a law in the body of U.S. law.

This judicial error might be called a natural error because Locke's social contract might have been misinterpreted by our early judges. This is why precedence cannot be held forever by any court. Today's students of Locke's social contract will say that Locke's social contract was actually installed by the founders and that the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence defined Locke's 'Society and the 'one People.' This 'one People' society is united with the forthcoming self-government that is defined in U.S. Constitution.

If the Supreme Court does not act to correct this error, Congress must act to make the Declaration of Independence a law as it was written on July 4, 1776.

The Potential of a Civil War

When the U.S. Supreme Court ruled wrongly that the Declaration of Independence is not a law, the 'one People,' which was identified in the first statement of the Declaration, new born citizens and new foreign citizens began to divide the USA into a 'melting pot' of cultures, after the assassination of Abe Lincoln. This is not what our founders expected.

Today, the USA has developed so many different cultures that it has lost its own identity. This loss has returned U.S. lawmaking to the arbitrary laws of the Parliament of England. Today, our morals are determined by past cultures defined by Darwin's evolutionary theory or by political power and the determination of 'what is political right or wrong.' Essentially the U.S. Revolutionary War was lost and the deaths of many colonists were in vain.

I conclude that the U.S. government has failed and must be redefined based on the first two paragraphs of Declaration of Independence and on a corrected meaning of the concept 'freedom.' Freedom is not an absolute term. Only God is absolute in all ways. Thus freedom is a concept that varies because of its relativity. Thus, one is not free to yell 'fire' in a theater when no fire exists. Nor is one free to hit someone physically. And since the Declaration mandates that all Men are created equal, it is not free tor the U.S. government to develop any poor classes.

If the U.S. government is not changed and if the USA does not develop the 'one People' mandated in the Declaration, I conclude that a terrible civil war can be expected. Other people hold predicyions. (click)

Can We Charge Deism and Atheism With the Degeneration and Destruction of the USA?

My broad research in many fields of thought, allow me to say that the U.S Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution function as a whole. I identify this whole because John Locke's social contract was installed by our founders and has two parts--- Society and Government. The whole is formed by 'one People,' as stated in the first sentence of the Declaration of Independence. The 'one People, form both the Society and the Government. This whole is merely a modern version the self-government created of the ancient Jews.

By August 2, 2007, I had prepared a blog on "The Declaration of Independence and the New 1776 Political Experiment." I sent copies to my Senators, President Bush. and Chief Justice Roberts.. I received one response from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV. In his response to my paper, the Senator said "While the Declaration of Independence in not considered law....."

Kenneth Burke, a poet and drams critic, tells us that people and groups of people develop different perspective of life. Thus, the Senator's response is merely a perspective of lawyers. Thus, to find the real truths about the Declaration of Independence, I conclude that perspectives broader than our lawyers are necessary. My perspective of the Declaration of Independence is presented above and in my August 2, 2007 blog.

If our lawyers do not view the first two paragraphs as the Lockean 'Society,' I conclude that our lawyers have changed the founding of the USA drastically and have turned the people of the USA away from God. So I say that the national government is destroying the USA and that deism and atheism partnership is not the cause of this destruction.

Will the Partnership of Deism and Atheism Destroy the USA?

Today, the symbols theism, deism, and atheism cover all human life on the subjects of theology and religion. Theism means an active God. Deism means an inactive God. Atheism means that God does not exist. These meanings hide a truth because deists have similar beliefs as atheists have about the universe. I say that this hidden truth is slowly destroying the USA. My study of theism, deism, and atheism used two Amazon discussions. (click) (click) So, let me discuss this hidden truth in more detail.

Like theism, deism accepts the existence of a supreme being. But deism and theism view the supreme being differently. They are different because deism believes that the Supreme being created the universe and then stopped creating, as Jews would say, on the seventh day. On the other hand, theism says that the supreme being is always active in many ways.

Since the supreme being is inactive, the believers in deism say that the universe ends. Here we find some of today's godless materialists. The other godless materialists of today are atheists who do not believe in a supreme being, and thus believe that the universe must end.

When a person believes that the universe has an end and theists believe that the universe has no end, two different cultures will develop in any nation. In the USA today, we are experiencing these two very different cultures. I believe that these two different cultures can be identified today as 'liberal' and 'conservative.' I also believe that this dualistic culture began in 1967 when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to remove prayers from school. This ruling increased the growth of atheism and the development of a partnership between deism and atheism in all sciences that believe that the universe ends.

I say that this partnership is destroying the USA.

Cosmological Arguments for the Existence of God

Based on sensual facts, cosmological arguments say that God exists. One popular fact says that the universe had a beginning. This fact implies the existence of a creator. However, if the universe had a beginning, it is a fact that the universe must have an end. Is this logic consistent with God? I say no.

Gottfried Leibniz (1646-1716) says that our reasoning is founded on two principles, the principle of contradiction and the principle of sufficient reason. So, he says that two kinds of truths exist: those of reason, which are necessary and of which the opposite is impossible, and those of facts, which are contingent and of which the opposite is possible. Since an infinite number of minute inclinations exist in the bodies of things in the universe, Leibniz says that sufficient reason must exist, without limit, for determining contingent truths and truths of fact for the infinite number of things in the universe. Cantor says that two infinities exist. One infinite is God. This infinite is determinate and cannot be exhausted. The other infinite is variable and has no limit.

Over the last twenty-five years, I have conducted research on God and the universe. When doing this research, I found a common thread of thought in a number of personalities. These personalities are Abraham, Moses, Plato, Jesus, Nicholas of Cusa, Kepler, Galileo, Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Cantor, US founders, and LaRouche. All of these personalities held similar thoughts.

Nicholas of Cusa unites God and the universe with the concepts 'enfold' and 'unfold.' God enfolds things and unfolds things. When things are enfolded, they are in God, And when thing are unfolded, they are in the universe. I do not believe that God oscillates the opposites, unfold and unfold, because God would force us to live in a see-saw universe. So, is is consistent to say that God and the universe existed always. God and the universe never had a beginning and God and the universe will never have an end.

In summary, cosmological arguments are no longer needed.

George is Conducting New Research

on quantum flux, cosmological arguments, and zero points

Divisibles Made By God, V (The Symphony of Life)

In Part I, Ch.5 of my book, I discuss the infinitely large (the cosmos) and the infinitely small (the atoms). Blaise Pascal viewed the infinitely large and infinitely small as mysteries and something man can admire. The physical scientists are investigating these mysteries. At this time, they say that a Big Bang explosion created the cosmos. On atoms, they expect to find physical atoms in atom smashers. Gottfried Leibniz says that the atom is not physical. In his New Science (against Newton) we find true atoms. He calls them monads in his paper on "Monadology." Donald H. Andrews, who passed on, would also say that the atoms of the universe are not physical. The atoms of the universe are thus the finite indivisibles which form all divisibles.

Scientists throughout the world must give Donald H. Andrews' 1966 book on "The Symphony of Life" a new life. A professor in chemistry at John Hopkins University, Andrews gave the 'electron' a new reality after France's Louis de Broglie proposed that the electron has a wavelike behavior and Davison and Germer proved that an electron has waves and does not move around its nucleus like a planet moves around its sun. The pic above is the view of materialists and atheists whereas spiritualists reject this view. Andrews shows that the electron vibrates like a rubber ball bounces up and down. Andrew also says that the vibrations of the electron produces music. So, all chemicals are singing chemicals.

Chemicals are created things that function for all things we find in the universe. So the things in the universe are continually vibrating ans singing. Your body is thus filled with complex music. However, the vibrations in bodies are are unseen and unheard. We can grasp this music by expanding our ability to perceive better, for instance, by improving our ability to feel.

Divisibles Made By God, IV (and a Timeless Universe)

Beyond proving that God exists and identifying six pair of opposites that help to determine God's intelligent design of the universe, in this blog I want to make my mind think about God's intelligent design so that I can develop a deeper and more complex theory about God's intelligent design.

I begin by saying that when God connects all finite indivisibles, God causes them to move and in different directions. I believe that this cause is an infinite number of timeless impulses of energy that God produces and give to all indivisibles that have just been embodied. These moving bodies are all finite things that God chose to create.

I can give you a an example of what my mind is thinking abouts in deeper level of God'a intelligent design of the universe. For example, in God's complex creation of our world, I view God as sitting at a piano and striking an infinite number of different keys all at once. When these key impulses occur, all finite indivisibles develop in infinite number of different lawful vibrations that are harmonious. So I conclude that God functions by giving musical vibrations to every embodied finite indivisible so they can function lawfully with these harmonious vibrations. However, each embodied indivisibles cannot receive the same musical vibrations because Leibniz says that the perception of each finite indivisible is different. So, the musical vibration in each finite thing will be different.

Obviously the creation is a very complex process. It is so complex that man will never know this complex process exactly. But it should be clear that God is active in this complex process and can intervene into this complex process. This does not mean that God has a clock that we should find. The events of a best of all universes requires no timing mechanism when it has a God.