Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Sunday, January 22, 2012

No New Blogs

George will be on vacation for awhile.

Saturday, January 21, 2012

The Real God of Jesus Christ

The real God of Jesus Christ was not the God of the Jews. Thus, Jesus recognized that the God of the Jews had a weakness. Judas did not recognize this weakness. This is why Judas betrayed Jesus and Jesus was murdered on a cross by the Jews.The real God of Jesus Christ is the God of all creatures because God made and maintain them.

Since the God of Jesus is active and holds an Intelligent Design of the Universe that has no end, the God of the Jews must be inactive because the Jewish God created a universe that comes to an end.

The active God of Jesus provides a continuous life to all living things forever.  But the inactive God of the Jews can only provide a continuous life to some living things.  Thus, the God of the Jews is weak and can exhaust Himself and things.

As seen, the good/evil dualism of the Jews limits the Jewish God. I conclude that this dualism was rejected by Jesus. That Jesus asked Judas to betray him so that he could fulfill a biblical statement would indicate that Jesus was insane. Jesus was not insane. The problem Jesus had with Judas was that Judas did not know what Jesus meant when Jesus said at John 14:20, 'I am in the Father, and ye in me, and I in you.' This statement was not understood by any Christians until the 15th century.

Friday, January 20, 2012

Authorities Are Dynamic, Not Static

In nations, authorities form the laws of a nation.  In the USA, the authorities of the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution formed the first laws of the body of the United Stats. Within the DOI,  two authorities exist. The first authority, which is found in the first two paragraphs, forms John Locke's Society. The second authority, in the remaining words, gives the Society the right to go to war against England.  Then, within the Constitution, only one authority exists. This authority forms John Locke's Government.

Obviously, the ungodly minds of U.S. citizens and politicians are ruining the USA.  But foreign  citizens and politicians are also ruining nations.

However, the ungodly minds of some citizens are also ruining the field of religion. For example, in the first century of A.D., Christians made a new religion based on the authorities (or teachings)  of Jesus. After the death of Jesus, the twelve disciples of Jesus became the authorities of Christianity.  In time, Peter became known as the highest disciple.  This authority of Peter, eventually led to new authorities given to Popes, saints, priests, cardinals, and bishop.  All of these Christian authorities led to  'cannon laws,' which allowed the molestation of children by any authority. (click)

The meaning of all Christian authorities above do not change if one worships an inactive God. But if one worships an active God, molestation and other Christian attributes will change and becomes unlawful because the universe never ends.

As I have taught about an active God, teachers (like Jesus) will always be teaching unskilled students.  However, since all human knowledge is dynamic and cannot be completed, teachers will always learn new ideas. The Vatican wants to freeze all Christian authorities.  This Vatican thought is wrong.

I say that all authorities are dynamic.
 

Thursday, January 19, 2012

It Is Time for People to Turn Away From Religions

In yesterday's blog, I show that God is indivisible and has no parts.  So, any person or religion will be wrong if they say that Jesus is the Son of God.  They will also be wrong if they say that Jesus is Lord, and that Jesus was resurrected. Like other systems of justice, Jesus was murdered, left his body parts, and was reborn often.

In the Gospel of St. John, at verse 14:20,  one must conclude that Jesus is not God, not the Son of God, and not a Lord.  But Jesus was special because he was one of those 'big thinkers' throughout history who developed new scientific research results about an active God and taught it.

People and religions, who do not accept the words above about Jesus, are turning their minds away from science, the only field of thought that can produce truths. The mystery of truths is not held by any religion.  This mystery does not even exist.  Truths are infinite in number. Accordingly, we can know some truths. But only God can know  truths that we can never know.  Thus, if a religion does not want to unify science and theology, its people should walk away from that religion.  Like Jesus did, one can then develop self knowledge about an active God.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

A Detailed Proof That An Inactive God Is False

Today, we are living in  period in which people are trying to determine whether God exists or does not exist.  This is not a scientific question because a thing that does not exist cannot be proven scientifically.

Thus, some people, who don't care about gaining knowledge, will likely become an atheist.  The other people, if they are open-minded, might be able to use their general thoughts to determine whether God is inactive or active.  In this blog, I will try to help those people who are open minded, are non-scientists, but have questions that science can answer.

With idolatry, God does not exists because it followers say that God terraformed himself into things.  So, idolatry had to be challenged and it was Abraham who determined that God exists and is One.  His monotheism was the first step toward the truths of God. In order to find more truths about God, the meaning of word 'one' can be connected to counting words, such as two, three, four, etc. Or the word 'one' can be connected to related words such as parts, wholes, etc..

If I use the word 'parts,' the word one either has no parts or has parts. If God has no parts, we can't add a relational truth to God's one.  The Jews and Christians say that God has a Son (or Lord). Thus, they are saying that God has parts. This saying is false because only things in the universe has parts. 

The Jewish and Christianity belief that God has parts was been challenged ever since 500 B.C. when Anaxagoras found that God One has no parts.  The greatest challenge against the belief of the Jews and Christians came from Jesus, who learned and taught that God's One has no parts.

When Jesus taught that God has no parts, a skilled scientist will understand the teaching of Jesus.  Such a scientist will say that Jesus also taught that God acted and creates the Universe. But only a very good scientist will say that God's One never changes.  This scientist will also say that God can act and did act by using his own 'non-exhaustible attributes' to form a universe that changes and never ends.

On reading, I suggest 'The Gnostic Gospels' by Elaine Pagels.  This book will be helpful to scientists and non-sientists.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Some More on 'The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency

Since I found scientific differences between between an inactive God and an active God about two years ago, I have been able to distinguish better the Republicans and Democrats because the Republicans, seem to think like theologians who teach an inactive God, and the Democrats, seem to think like theologians who teach an active God.

I am able to separate the Republicans and Democrats because an inactive and active God are opposing concepts and cannot coexist at any time.  Thus, only one God exists.

On the 1/16/12 post, I said that the minds  of Republicans and Democrats do not think the same way on the concept of freedom. Republicans see freedom as a concept of humans whereas freedom is only an absolute concept of God, who has no cause.  Since humans are created by God, humans are caused and thus can only have relative freedoms.

The concepts "free enterprise' and 'free market' will be found in the mind of Republicans and in some Democrats.  But many Democrats will limit Free enterprise and the free market.  I will agree with these many Democrats.

The meanings of words such as 'freedom' are  troublesome in all nations because the national languages of every nation can never be completed or perfected. Thus, I believe that the Republican and Democrats in the USA are unable to compromise different ideas because they do not know how to develop precise meanings of national symbolic languages.

More on 'The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency'

The debates between the Republicans and President Obama this year will not involve the true active God because the Republican candidates and President Obama attend a religion that teaches the false inactive God.

Therefore, I say that the U.S. government will not turn the people of the USA toward an active God before five more years pass and the people will debate the inactive God vs. the active God.


Five Republican candidates still exist. The religions of these Republicans are as follows:

Newt Gingrich: Catholic Church
Ron Paul: Baptist Church
Rick Perry:United Methodist Church
Mitt Romney: Mormon Church (Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)
Rick Santorum; Catholic Church

The religion that President Obama attends is the United Church of Christ

Monday, January 16, 2012

The Two Gods and the Voting of the U.S. Presidency

The forthcoming voting of the U.S. presidency in 2012 is very clear with respect to to my research on two Gods, the inactive God and the active God.  As I continue to say, the inactive God is false and the active God is true.

My research says that the Republican candidates will support the false inactive God whereas the Presidential Obama will support the true active God.

The most powerful idea that lures the Republican candidates to the inactive God is freedom.  Since the greatest freedom will be found in God, the freedom in a human is limited. The Republicans have not shown me how this limit is managed by government.  

On the other hand, the most powerful idea that lures President Obama to the active God is also freedom.  But Obama shows me that he is able to manage the limit of freedom, when he uses laws in the Declaration of Independence and uses the statement -- all Men are created equal.

With an active God, all people are equal.  But in an inactive God, to humans, anything goes.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

News: CBS-TV (60 Minutes)

Tonight, 60 Minutes reported the mental abilities  and the autism of Jake. (click) Since Jake's mental abilities are increasing rapidly and his autism is going away, I give my explanation of Jake's experiences.

I say that Jake died on a different planet, which has developed people who are advanced mentally. Since indivisible Spirits do not die, after his death, Jake's Spirit entered the 'dark matter' where he can be reborn and receive a new body from his Father and Mother on planet earth so that the mental abilities of the  people on planet earth grows. This theory by me is consistent with an active God and His Intelligent Design.

More on the Debates Between an Inactive God and an Active God

Today, the difference between an inactive God and an active God is still unclear because the fields of science and theology were not distinguished by our  colleges and universities. Science and theology became even more confusing after colleges and universities advertised their nonsectarian positions.

Some years ago, I discussed the word 'nonsectarian' with the President of John Hopkins University (JHU).  I told him that colleges and universities can study theology without violating the nonsectarian promise.  I said that 'theory' and 'practice' are two unique concepts that are separated in every field of thought. So, I said that colleges and universities can develop theories about an inactive God and an active God without stepping on the feet of any religion.  He agreed. 

However, scientists and theologians are not coming together in colleges and universities. Instead, some scientists reject God without any scientific proof that God does not exist.  And most theologians at colleges and universities are serving specific religions without studying the progress of those scientists, like me, who do believe in God. For instance, I have proven scientifically that the inactive God is false and that the active God is true.

Theologians will make scientific errors if science and theology are not unified.  I already found a major error of  Professor Bart D. Ehrman of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.  This error is found in his work on the life of Judas Iscariot.  In Ch. Sixteen  The Gospel of Judas, of  Herbert Krosney's book (click),  Ehrman says,
Jesus is an eternal figure; he is part of the higher God, he is greater than and separate from man, he is eternal.
My theory of God says that God in One and has no parts.  Ehrman's error supports the inactive God of Judaism and Christianity and thus rejects my theory of an active God and the Oneness of God.

Saturday, January 14, 2012

Our Debates Between an Inactive God and an Active God

At this time, people throughout the world are trying to distinguish the inactive God and the active God clearly.  I believe that people began to distinguish these two gods in 2000 when a young  newspaper, Science & Theology News, began to report the togetherness of science and theology.  But, on July 31, 2006, this newspaper had to close because it had insufficient support.

 Fortunately, when this newspaper closed, my book, The First Scientific Proof of God, appeared in June of 2006. This book recovered the loss of this  newspaper because it unifies science and theology.  However, I did not stop the research on this unification.  I continued this research on this website.  On this website, I eventually found that God is active.

Today, many religious leaders are not interested in unifying science and theology. Such a leader teaches theology, not science, and teaches the inactive God.  Instead of opening science,non-scientific leaders teach its followers that they have one life in this dying universe but can live forever in God's heaven after death if they are good. These non-scientific leaders are found in Judaism and Western Christian churches.

Religious leaders can become scientific.  They can also unify science and theology. For instance, a scientist knows that God has no heaven.  Heavens will be found only in the evening sky of the universe.  So, if a person wants to live forever, an inactive God must be rejected and an active God must be accepted. With an active God, every human being receives a new and better life by being  reborn in a universe that is not dying. To make sure that this new life is better, we must make all nations democracies.

Instead of finding the active God and building democracies, the Jews and Western world Christians have accepted the inactive God.  This acceptance can lead only to wars, riches, and poverty.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Developing Knowledge of One World With An Active God

The last ancient person, who was developing knowledge of an active God, was Muhammad. The development of this knowledge stopped when Mahammad died and his followers and crafty Jewsmade the Qur'an and started the religion called 'Islam.'  This error can be corrected by Muslims and Eastern Christians.

After Muhammad, the further development of knowledge about an active God had to wait for the 14th century Rennaissnce. During this period the Eastern Christians would inform Westerners about Plato's Dialogues. With Plato's dialogues, Nicholas of Cusa would produce the book, 'On Learned Ignorance.'(Click) This book says that human knowledge cannot be completed because God is beyond all opposites. Since God is beyond all opposits, we can must connect God to the universe with the attributes of God and the attributes of creatures. For instance God and the universe can be connected with the pair of opposites,  'infinite' and 'finite.' (e.g., one God is infinite and all creatures are finite).  We find these opposites by studying the finite things in the universe, as suggested by Paul at Rom. 1:20, and determine whether a concept in the universe will coexist with its opposite as an attribute of Godt.

Beyond the work of Cusa on an active God, I found knowledge about an active God in the work of Galileo, Johannes Kepler,  Gotrried Leibniz,  Immanuel Kant, Friedrich Hegel, Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupetuis, Ben Franklin,  Bernhard Riemann, Georg Cantor, Ernst Cassirer,  Susanne Langer , Kenneth Burke, and Lyndon LaRouche.

Thursday, January 12, 2012

The Streams of Thoughts of An Inactive God and An Active God

The historical appearances of personalities, scriptures, and religions show the two  different streams of thought on the subjects of (1) an inactive God and (2) an active God.

Inactive God                                            
Abraham
Religion (Judaism)
Moses
Old Testament

Active God
Anaxagoras
Plato
Alexander the Great
Jesus

Inactive God
New Testament
Religion (Christianity)

Active God
Eastern Christianity
 
Inactive God
Werstern Christianity
 
Active God 
Muhammad

Inactive God
Qur'an
Religion (Islam)
Catholic Christianity
Protestant  Christianity

Active God
Nicholas of Cusa
Galileo
Kepler

lf one studies the personalities, scriptures, and religions of the inactive God, one learns that all thoughts are focused only on the good/evil dualism, morals, and the end of the universe. And if one studies the personalities, scriptures, and religions of the active God, one learns that all thoughts are focused only on knowledge, laws of nature, and the endlessness of the universe.

In one looks at the contents of each different God, one learns that the Qur'an scripture switched the thoughts of Muhammad from an active God to an inactive God when the Islam religion was created.  This switch isolated all Eastern Christians from other Christians.

In the column of an active God, I dded Galileo because his book, 'Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences,' confirms an active God. In this book, Galileo proves that all created things by God have an infinite number of infinitesimal parts. So when the Vatican rejected the Copernicus Revolution and imprisoned Galileo, the Vatican  rejected both of Galileo's New Sciences. The Vatican apologized its rejection of the Copernicus Revolution but it has not apologized the second science.  If the Vatican apologizes the second science, the catholic church must turn their thoughts to an active God.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

The Use of Poor Scriptures by Ignorant Leaders

I say that all scriptures are made by humans and are not the words of God. I conclude that God created humans with intelligence and made us 'little Gods' so that we would be free to develop own lives, roads, homes, etc.

In my book on the proof of God, I discuss the human problems that ignorant scriptures develop. See Part I, Ch.6. (click)  Below, I discuss a very large human problem that some scriptures have produced.

From the time of Anaxagoras at 500 B.C. through Muhammad's death at 632 A.D., the people of the  Western world opened their minds to the true and active God for 1132 years.  However, from the time of Abraham (at 1812 B.C.) to 500 B.C. and from the time from Muhammad's death at 632 A.D. to 2012 A.D., the people in the Western world closed their minds on the active God and worshipped the false and inactive God for 2902 years.

Thus, for roughly 4000 years, about 75% of the Western world people were enslaved to a false and inactive God by ignorant leaders.  And, about 25% of the Western world people have been freed to a true and active God by intelligent leaders.

When Gottfried Leibniz was asked by the Pope to study the God of the Chinese, Leibniz said that the God of the Chinese is the same God as his God.  Leibniz's work on his 'Monadology' shows us that Leibniz's God is an active God.  Since the USA has authorized atheism, the USA no longer follows any God.  So, I detect the development of a new USA/China problem soon.

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

More On the Beginning of Christianity and the Last Real Christian Church

This blog continues the blog of yesterday.

Yesterday, I said that Church of the East is aligned to the works of Anaxagoras, Plato, Alexander the Great, Nestorianism, Nestorius, and the teachings of Jesus, who is not the Son of God. It is thus clear that this Eastern church does believe in the God of Anaxagoras, the God of Plato, the God of Alexander the Great, and the God of Jesus. Thus, the Church of the East was also the church of Muhammad when he died, since he was a follower of Nestorius and Jesus.

However, after Muhammad died, his relatives and some crafty Jews formed a new religion by making a new scripture. This new scripture is the Qur'an.  (In my discussion of the problems of scriptures, I report these crafty Jews on p. 77 of my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God.')

As I said before, teachers are always wiser than their students. This is why I say that the gospels of the New Testament are filled with errors about  Jesus and his teachings. The same kind of errors must be expected in the Qur'an by Muhammad's relatives and these crafty Jews.

The potential errors in the Qur'an are great because the Qur'an turned the followers of Muhammad away from teachings of Muhammad, the teachings of Jesus and the God of Anaxagoras.  These errors were great because a new religion was formed and was aligned to the God of the Jewish Pharisees.

The formation of Islam with the Qur'an scripture is a religious disaster because the God of Anaxagoras and Muhammad are the same God but are very different than the God of the Jewish Pharisees.

I conclude that the Muslims and all Western Christian churches have developed a problem with God because they are teaching the God of the Jewish Pharisees. This Jewish God has a universe that ends.

Monday, January 09, 2012

The Beginning of Christianity and the Last Real Christian Church

I say that Christianity began in Greece with the thoughts of Anaxagoras (500-.428 B.C.).(click)  He spoke of God as the 'all-containing One' and spoke of God's creation as 'each thing in each thing.'  Since the God of Anaxagoras is active, the God of the Old Testament was being challenged.

At this time, the eastern people of  Mediterranean Sea were fighting against oligarchism and slavery. To help them, Plato (427-347 B.C.) produced many dialogues. The Parmenides and Timaeus dialogues confirmed the God of Anaxagoras.  And Plato's political dialogues guided the thoughts of  Alexander the Great, who freed these eastern people from oligarchism.(click). So the God of Anaxagoras was ready to become the God of all people.

I conclude that Jesus was teaching the God of Anaxagoras. I also believe that Jesus moved to Greece, some time after age 12, and learned about the God of Anaxagoras from the Neoplatonists. Further, I say that some of the Neoplatonists still exist today in those Eastern Christian churches.

One is the Church of the East, which is associated with Nestorianism.  This church was advanced by Nestorius, Patriarch of Constantinople from 428 – 431.  It emphasizes the disunion between the human and divine natures of Jesus. (Nestorius and his doctrine were condemned at the First Council of Ephesus in 431.)

However, many followers of this Christian church relocated to Persia and became affiliated with the local Christian community there. Today, Persia is Iran, which has a small number of Christians and many Muslims. It seems that these Iranian Christians worship the last true Christian church.

To be continued.

Sunday, January 08, 2012

When I Pray (to God), I Reason Perceptions Such As 'All Rights'

After the USA became a new nation in 1776, Abe Lincoln became the first President to say that the  the Declaration of Independence (DOI) is part of the body of U.S. laws. Many people say that Lincoln went to war to save the Union and end slavery.(click)  But I say that Lincoln's mind was focused on higher ideas --- the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the social contract theory of Locke.

In 2011, historians said, "while slavery and its various and multifaceted discontents were the primary cause of disunion, it was disunion itself that sparked the Civil War."(click)

I believe that Lincoln's mind also saved the following DOI statements:  Laws of Nature's God and all Men are created equal. Both statements define all U.S. rights:  (1) the Rights of the People, which come from God;  (2) the Rights of the federal government, which come from the People;  and (3) the Rights of the States, which come from the federal government.

I believe that Unions are not understood by humans because they can't find God. They can't find God because our perceiving abilities are too weak to sense an infinite God. To  find God and understand Unions, a person must lift their mind upwardly to higher and higher lines of reasoning. If you reason, God knows you because your mind's lines of reasoning are unifying your perceptions. When you  reason your perceptions, you are praying to God mentally.

So, here is some reasoning information about Unions that humans have created for God. The Union of the USA was identified in the first statement of the DOI by the founders as 'the People.' The Union of the USA was identified again as 'the People' in the first statement of the Preamble of the Constitution. This statement says, 'We the People of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union,...'

Saturday, January 07, 2012

Laws of an Activee God Should Be Allowed in the USA and Should Also Be Allowed in Other Nations

When the founders of the USA made the Declaration of Independence, they said, 'When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The above words mean that all declared U.S. laws are based on the God of all Americans. Thus,  the Laws of Nature means God's Intelligent Design of the universe and the Laws of Nature's God means God's moral laws of humans. Since the God of all Americans is active and the universe never ends, all laws of the Gods of the Jews, Christians, and Muslims must be rejected if they accept an inactive God.

Since Jews and Muslims accept an inactive God, the laws of Judaism (Old Testament) and the laws of Islam (Shariah) cannot be allowed in America.  However, my research says that the Christian God is  active.  So, Christian laws could be allowed in America if Christians accept (1) the Intelligent Design of an active God and (2) the moral laws of an active God.

Friday, January 06, 2012

The U.S. Supreme Court Must Change

In the USA, the positions of the U.S. Supreme Court has been filled Court with lawyers ever since 1776.  However, this long arrangement has lost its effectiveness because man has proven in 2006 that God is active.  This active God and His universe forms one world and thus has no end. Since this proof is scientific, the Supreme Court positions must be filled with scientists and moralists instead of lawyers.

The scientific and moral errors of the U.S. Supreme Court are huge and significant. For instance, this Court has ruled in favor of atheism and abortion. It also ruled that Declaration of Independence (DOI) is not a law, as the Constitution is. This ruling about the DOI removed God from the USA and eliminated the social contract theory of John Locke, which connects the private and public sectors of the USA.

The Supreme Court ruling on the DOI removed the following DOI statement from the USA:  Law of Nature and of Nature's God. This statement said that Laws of Nature are scientific laws that come  from God's Intelligent Design and that  Laws of Nature's God are moral laws that come from God and do not come from the government or the people.

The Supreme Court ruling on the DOI also removed the following DOI statement from the USA: all Men are created equal. This statement is a moral law (or a Law of Nature's God).  This statement makes all nations on planet earth equal. This statement assures that all people, after death, will be reborn again in a godly nation.

I hope that all democracies take heed to the problem of the U.S. Supreme Court that I discuss on this blog.

Thursday, January 05, 2012

Adding John Locke's Social Contract Theory to a Democracy

Nations that are developing new democracies can use words in the U.S. Declaration of Independence (DOI) to add John Locke's social contract theory to the new democracy.  The U.S. founders installed Locke's theory in the U.S. democracy on July 4, 1776 when they prepared the DOI. Locke's theory is the first two paragraphs of the DOI.  I show these two paragraphs below.
When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States.
At this time, these two paragraphs are not effective in the U.S. democracy because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled wrongly that the DOI was only an authority to go to war against England. This Supreme Court error thus removed Locke's theory, God, and other important laws from the USA.  For example, the statement, 'all men are created equal' is a proven act of God.  But this godly act has been removed in the USA!!!

The development of democracies will not be effective unless the national language of a democracy is perfected.

Wednesday, January 04, 2012

News: Iowa's Republican Presidential Results

Yesterday, the people of the U.S State of Iowa voted mostly for three major Republican candidates ---  Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum, and Ron  PaulL This voting is the first step to remove President Barack Obama from the White House.

When he went to the White House, President Obama has tried continuously to make U.S. citizens equal in different ways.  Since these three candidates will not try to make  U.S. citizens equal at all, a Republican win will cause the USA to return to the ugly and godless U.S. democracy.

Theophanes or Little Gods

In Judaism and Christianity, the concept 'theophany' means a variable manifestation of a Deity. (click)   An example in Judaism is the appearance of an angel to Moses through a burning bush. And an example in Christianity is the appearance of Jesus through the Virgin Mary. I reject these examples.

In Part IIa, Ch. 2 of my book on The First Scientific Proof of God, I discuss the manifestation of a 'little God' on page 85. There, I say 'God could not give himself to the universe partially or diminishedly.' This is true because God is absolute and cannot create things from nothing by dividing Himself into parts or by reducing Himself to smaller things.

In order to understand how God creates, man must identify the attributes of God and connect them to the universe with opposing attributes of the universe. So, when I found that God has the attributes of One, Equality, and Union, I act as a 'little God' and connect God to the universe with the opposing universals many, inequality, and relation on page 128 of my book. I also say that only humans can act as 'little Gods.'  For this reason I speak of 'big thinkers' and place Jesus and other humans into a higher group of humans.

In yesterday's blog, I say that the concept 'equality' is found only in God.  So, all humans are equal because all of them are 'little Gods.' In my book, I also speak of the divinity of humans such as Jesus because all big thinkers might be called 'little divine Gods.

I conclude that many religious leaders are power-seekers. To maintain power, they do not develop many 'little Gods.'  Islam fundamentalism and the Christian Vatican are examples of power-seekers.

Tuesday, January 03, 2012

How Can the Equality of Humans Become Real?

Today, U.S. Syndicated Columnist, Charles Krauthammer asks, 'Are We Alone in the Universe?'  After identifying the research data about life on other planets, he concludes that only politics can answer such a question.  I agree with Krauthammer because only politics can answer the question, 'How Can  the Equality of Humans Become Real?'

Accordingly, all nations must become democracies before the equality of humans will become real and  before we learn whether we live alone in the universe.

While democracies are increasing in numbers, the new democracies are not developing properly. One improper development of a new democracy is the absence of a godly social contract theory. I say that this theory was developed only by John Locke of England.

Locke's theory is not perfect because he suggests  land ownership of the people. I say that land and and minerals must be owned only by Locke's 'Government' because land and minerals must be shared equally by all humans. Locke's theory has two parts, 'Society' and 'Government.'  Today, Society is called 'private sector' and Government  is called 'public sector.' 

A democracy can be destroyed easily if the public sector is destroyed.  This sector was destroyed in the USA when the U.S. Declaration of Independence (DOI) was interpreted wrongly by the U.S. Supreme Court only as an authority to go to war against England on July 4, 1776. The first two paragraphs of the DOI created Locke's 'Society', which in the USA is a 'society under God.'

So, if humans want to make the equality of humans a reality, a democracy must include a private and public sector. These two sectors are unified and cause a democracy to move forward into the unknown. To stabilize a democracy is to destroy it.

Monday, January 02, 2012

We Must Develop a New Form of Human Life

After people developed a belief and faith in God,  power-seeking leaders identified many different theologies, built a religion, and built places for worship.  In 2012, it is now time to agree that only one God exists, that only one religion exists, and that prayer can occur at any time and place.

If all people on this planet make this change now, the people in all nations must become equal. This equality must occur because after death every human being will be reborn and will not be reborn at the same place.  This rebirth is necessary because life-after-death cannot occur in God, as many religions teach, because God is one and thus has no parts. It seems that the religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam did not know this fact.

The minds of the people in these three religions are clearly degenerating because science is not being applied.  For instance, (1) Judaism still teaches an inactive God;  (2) Christianity still teaches about the Virgin Mary an the savior of Jesus; and, (3) Islam still teaches the submission of the human mind to the will of God.

If this new form of  human life is not developed with democracies, wars on this planet cannot be stopped. My new human life will build peace and will prevent all these wars..