A Very Importnt Progressive Person--- Jesus Christ

After the message on the State of the Union on Jan. 25, 20011 by President Obama, the general politics between the Democrats and Republicans was shifted to very specific politics between the progressives and conservatives. The progressives want major progresses through government whereas the conservatives want minor progresses through a free market economy.

Since the early 1960s, the progressives in the White House were John F. Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, James Carter, William Clinton, and President Obama. And the conservatives in the White House were Ronald Reagan, George Bush and George W. Bush.

To these men in the White House, I want to add a progressive person, who lived over 2000 years ago. His name is Jesus Christ. In my knol website (click) , in PART B, I am beginning to present the progressive teachings of Jesus Christ.

Progressivism, Conservatism, and Jesus Christ

When President Obama proposed 'progress' in his State of the Union message on Jan. 25, 2011, he separated himself from conservatism but made all Americans closer to Jesus Christ because Jesus teaches progress and the morals of God.

The Internet information says that progressivism is a political philosophy that promotes changes through Government. But progressivism is opposed by conservatism. (click) The Internet information says that conservatism is also a political philosophy that promotes the maintenance of traditional institutions. It supports gradual change in society with a limited government. But some conservatives seek a return to the way things were. (click) In my newspaper, the conservative Syndicated Columnist, Cal Thomas, reduced Government by saying it regulates and does not innovate. As a former scientist in Government, I conclude that Thomas doesn't know the truths about the science in Government.

Jesus Christ teaches progress, science, and morals throughout the New Testament. Here, I will discuss Chapter 24 of Matthew on the subject of 'tho darkening of the sun' at verse 29. Before this verse, Jesus teaches what will happen among nations and people before the sun darkens. For example, in verse 22, he says that the length of the days will become shorter and shorter. The shortened days is the sign that our planet is moving closer and closer to the sun. Eventually planet earth will fall into the sun where it becomes fuel for the sun. When this occurs the Heaven of stars we saw in the evening sky and our planet will pass away (verse 35)

After verse 29, Jesus teaches the progress we must make. For instance, in verse 27, Jesus says that the Son of Man will come. But the Son of Man will not come if we did not develop the Son of Man. In verse 30, the Son of Man is a fleet of spacecraft that can transport earthling to a new planet. Noah was a typical 'Son of Man' who made an ark to save people from a flood (See Jesus' words in verses 37-40.) In verse 32, Jesus says that we must search for different 'signs' (seasons, etc.) of the darkening.

If the conservatives win over the progressives, the number of scientists and technologists will decrease and the USA will degenerate. Now is the time for all people to come to the aid of the USA.

Progress vs. Money

After the State of the Union message by President Obama on Tuesday, the President and I came together on the subject of 'progress.' We came together because I am a scientist and know that Jesus Christ was the greatest known scientist and moralist before modern science emerged with the new 15th century progressive work of Nicholas of Cusa. Those readers who want to learn more about the scientific and moralistic work of Jesus Christ, I am revealing the progressive work of Jesus Christ on my knol website in Part B. (click)

A scientist who is not progressive is not a scientist and can't become a follower of Jesus Christ. But this kind of scientist can become interested in money, especially if his or her bank accounts can be filled. Scientists are thus divided today because some scientists like more progress whereas the other scientists like more money. Progress is also a political subject and is opposed by the conservatives because they must also like more money. (click)

However, money has always been a serious problem for humans because no alternative to money has been found by the progressive people. Jesus Christ found an alternative to money. (Start at Matt. 25:15) -But when Jesus overthrew the tables of the moneychangers at the Temple, Jesus was killed on the cross.

The alternative to money is to keep it out of the banks so that you die and have no money because you will be reincarnated (born again ) without knowing that you lived before. If this alternative is not acceptable and people are allowed to fill the banks, more and more people will be born poor, while fewer and fewer and fewer people will fill 'family banks.' The accumulation of money is the path to war. In order to attain progress, we must change 'money' to 'a means' and then change 'the end' to 'a progress.'

The Responses of Paul Ryan and Michele Bachmann to President' Obama's Mssage on the State of the Union

The message of the State of the Union of President Obama was 'progress.' I thought that JFK wrote the message and that a second Sputnik was sent into space by a foreign nation such as China. However, the responses to this 'progress' message for the Republicans, by Paul Ryan, and the Tea Parties, by Michele Bachmann, were unreasonable in light of my blog yesterday on the subject of 'finite money.'

If the Republican and Tea Party responses are installed to reduce our debt by limiting government and taxes, the USA will lose its current spiritual and economic world leadership. The Republicans, Tea parties, and our 'Economic Institutes' tell me that they do not understand God and the things that God made. In my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' one learns that God is infinite Thus, all things found in our world, including money, are varying finite things.

If a person has a debt, that person can pay the debt either fast or slow. To reduce a debt fast, a second income is necessary. The debt of a nation can be paid fast with 'progress' with increased employment and taxes. However, if the debt of the USA must be paid slowly and without progress, social problems or even war will develop because the U.S. money quantity is very unequal among the population.

The responses of Ryan and Bachmann included no U.S. progress. Instead, their responses would increase unemployment and decrease taxes. With these responses, the US debt will be paid very slowly. With no national progress, the U.S population, intelligence, and money quantity will degenerate.

It is clear to me that the progress proposed by President Obama is preferred. To make 'progress' in the USA, I suggest that Congress print more money to fund the progress projects. If this progress is successful, foreign nations might even buy some of this progress.

Michele Bachmann and Her Response to President Obama's Speech Tonight

On the equality of people in the USA, Michele Bachmann might say tonight, after President Obama's message on the State of the Union, that people came to the USA to make money freely. If she says these words for the Republican party, neither the Republican Party nor her, realize that money is never infinite anywhere in the world because only God is infinite. Thus, in any nation, created or uncreated, money is always finite.Accordingly, in any nation, in order to become a rich person, a person must take money from other people by quietly committing crime that is hard to detect.

Our founders must have known that money is finite in all nations. This is why Ben Franklin said that when people need money, government must print some. So, our founders were very intelligent about money systems and built a very new nation. The new nation they built has a finite supply of money that should always increase and circulate among all of its citizens. This is why the founders said in the Declaration of Independence that 'all Men are created equal.'

All of the teaching of economies today in the United States are wrong because our colleges and universities do not separate an 'infinite' thing (God) from all 'finite things' (created things).

The Union of the United States of America

The Democrats, Republicans and the Tea Parties do not seem to understand the difference between the Union of the United States of America and a union of a corporation such as General Motors. In the Declaration of Independence, the founders open the first statement of the USA by speaking about the 'one People.' Then, the Preamble of the Constitution say, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, ..."

These founding words mean that the Union of United States of America is always perfecting, no matter how more perfect the Union has become. It is also clear that this Union has goals, which are reasonable and achievable

Obviously, the General Motor Corporation is not a union because it does not unify all of its workers under God. However, the General Motor Corporation can become a Union of the USA if all of its workers are unified under God.

It seems that a free market economy of companies cannot perfect the USA unless it aligns its goals to the goals of the USA.

Giving Life to the Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution are held in the National Archives at Washington, DC. In the DOI, one finds words that define John Locke's 'Society' in the first two paragraphs. Then, the remaining words in the DOI authorize this Society to go to war against England. In the Constitution, the words define John Locke's 'Government.' Accordingly, Locke's words about the Society and Government define Locke's 'social contract.' As time passes, the first two paragraphs of the DOI became known as the 'private sector.' Then, the Constitution became known as the 'public sector.' On July 4, 1776, this new political experiment began. (click)

The War of 1812 became the last war with England. But an economic war with England's free traders was coming because they needed American cotton. This need for cotton led to the American Civil War between the North and South because the British traders failed to promote slavery with Darwin's book on evolutionary theory , which landed in America in 1859. By 1861, Abe Lincoln was in office and followed the first two paragraphs of the DOI. These two paragraphs would be followed for a hundred years because the colonists fought for a nation under God.

In 1963, these two paragraphs would lose some of its godly power when prayers were removed from the public schools by the U.S. Supreme Court. In 1973, this Court also ruled that abortion could not be banned. As a result of these rulings, a new political power developed in America. Its name became known as atheism. (click) Each atheist rejects God. But no atheist is able to prove that God does not exist. Thus, the political power of atheism will not last long because new proofs of God will appear in the new century.

However, these Supreme Court rulings affected the two paragraphs of the DOI and ideologies of the major political powers, the Democrats and Republicans. For instance, the Democrats believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. But the Republicans believe in personal responsibility, limited government, and free markets. (click) As seen, the Democrats want to hold onto the two paragraphs of the DOI whereas the Republicans want to drop these paragraphs completely. Essentially, the Democrats want to maintain the Union whereas the Republicans want to drop the Union.

In 2006, I presented 'The First Scientific Proof of God.' (click) This book shows that God connects his infinite world to our finite world. This proof says that God made a single and endless world. Accordingly, all humans will exist forever and will receive a new body after every death. Thus, the DOI statement, all Men are created equal, is perfect. The atheists have not been able to review my proof of God. The first scientific review was favorable. My proof of God is currently being considered by other scientists. (click) (click) (click)

Soon, I expect the death of atheism; expect a new harmony between the Democrats and Republicans; expect a new and purposeful life; and expect the development of world peace. Further, I expect the death of all free-for-all nations and expect a new life to be developed in the cosmos.

Eliminating the Declaration of Independence From the U.S. Law Brought Crime Into America

Today, I recognize three basic psychologists. They are three different psychologists because God either does not exist or does exist but is either inactive or active. The first group of psychologists are atheists and believe that human behaviors are purely mechanical. The second group of psychologists are deists and believe that human behaviors are based on secular rights. The third group of psychologists are theists and believe that human behaviors are based on the rights of God.

Out of these three groups of psychologists come many different opinions on the causes of crimes, such as the causes of the Arizona killings. Some of these opinions will say that a criminal is mentally ill and a judge will send the criminal to a mental hospital for correction or for isolation for long periods. Some patients might never leave such a hospital.

In the USA, I believe that these basic psychologists formed soon after 'the People' of the USA turned away from the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence, turned away from the active God, and changed the USA drastically. This change led to the opening of these mental hospitals, which are unnecessary if the human mind of all Americans are developed properly by families and educators.

The U.S. Government and 'the People'' Could Be the Cause of the Arizonaa Killings

The government and 'the People' of the USA are the causes of many crimes because they have the ability from God to reduce and eliminate crimes but do not act. Thus, the U.S.Congress, the White House, the Supreme Court and 'the People' might have caused the recent Arizona killings. In this blog, I show when 'the People' and the U.S.government can be viewed as the cause of a crime.

On July 4, 1776, our founders said in the Declaration of Independence that God exists. In 1963, the Supreme Court disagreed with the founders and eliminated prayers in public schools. However, in 2006, I challenged the Supreme Court when I presented the first scientific proof of God. Only atheists, materialists, and evolutionists rejected this scientific proof. But in my book, I also told the reader that Jesus Christ taught the cause of crime at Mark 7:15-23. There, Jesus said that all evils come from within us. that is, in our minds. In my research on Jesus, I also connected the thoughts of Jesus to the thoughts of Plato, Aristotle, and the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament during the period of King Ptolemy (285-245 BC). In Greece, Jesus thus learned from Plato and Aristotle that we have a mind and that it is within us.

Today, I know that God exists and that most crimes comes from the flaws of the national language of every nation. Since I can show that the English language limits the development of science, the English language must be reformed in order to reduce and eliminate crimes such as the killings in Arizona. However, since the national language of every nation is flawed, all national languages must be reformed. The sooner these national languages are fixed, the sooner peace will come and the sooner crimes will go away .

The Arizona Shooter: Jared Lee Loughner

Although the Arizona shooter, Jared Lee Loughner, killed and harmed people, we will never know exactly why Loughner killed and harmed these people. If this question could be answered, such crimes could be reduced and eve eliminated. Some questions and answers are coming and 60 Minutes identified a few important 'concepts' on TV last evening.

Last evening, 60 Minutes told us that the concepts nothingness, chaos, and reality were in the mind of Loughner. Interestingly, these three concepts are debated very often today in colleges, universities, bookstores, and the Internet. Loughner was also seeking the role of government from Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz..), whose brain was harmed by Lougnner. Interestingly, the role of government is a continuous debate in Congress between the Democrats and Republicans.

The debates about the concepts nothingness, chaos and realty will cause some students to turn away from education. And the role of government defined by the Republicans will also cause some students to turn away from education. So, the reporting of 60 Minutes was excellent because the cause of Loughner killings and harm had a clear deeper cause. The pics below tell us that Loughner's mind changed his body quickly.

Th English Language and Shooters

When a shooter commits a crime, like the shooter did in Arizona recently, Federal, State, and local enforcement agencies, radio and TV broadcasters, newspapers, and families search for the root cause that led to the shooting. These organizations search either for a single root cause or search for many causes. These searches depend on one's belief system.

For instance, some people believe that root causes are not found in living things. They are spiritualists. In politics, liberals also reject the root cause in living things. A fewer number of other people believe that root causes can be found in non-living and living things. They are non-spiritualists, such as atheists, materialists, evolutionists, deists. In politics, conservatives believe that criminals are born and that a root cause can be found in the criminal.

As a spiritualist, I believe that root causes will not be found in living things. But I believe that causes of crime can be reduced if the causes of crime are identified. While I worked in the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) of the U.S. Department of Justice, I concluded that some crimes originate in our national English language. Since Jesus Christ taught that evilness comes from within us at Mark 7:23 , I sought causes of crime and concluded that our English language can defile our minds. At NIJ, I concluded that the English language can defile our minds. I reported this conclusion again in a red color paragraph of my knol website (click).

Socialism

The word 'socialism' and many other words have confused the minds of many Americans. The mind of the recent shooter in Arizona is an example of a confused American mind. This confusion of Americans is caused by flaws in the English language. The English language became flawed by England's' intellectuals, who use Aristotle's logic, logical reasoning, and absolutes to construct English statements, theories, books, etc.

The weakness of the English language can be detected by studying the more powerful German language which began to change in the 15th century and expanded rapidly in the 17th century with the life of Gottfried Leibniz. The English language and German language are very different today because these two different languages have led to two different views of God. To be more specific, in the English language and in many Americas, God is inactive. But in the German language and in some Americans like me, God is active.

In the USA, I conclude that the conservatives and liberals might be separated by these two views of God because the Republican ideology aligns to the inactive God whereas the Democratic ideology aligns to the active God. On socialism, Republicans fear social programs whereas the Democrats love social programs. In the English language, socialism is constructed with logic, capitalism vs. communism. But in the German language an infinite number of social programs appear.

When one studies the life of Jesus Christ, the teachings of Jesus deal with an active God and social programs that unify people.

Why Doesn't the U.S. Government Install Full Employment?

Apparently, the founding documents of 'the USA' have been thrown away by Congress without telling us. Congress thus made laws that were not authorized by the Constitution. Essentially, these unauthorized laws have changed 'the USA' drastically.

According to the Constitution in Article I, Section 8, Congress is authorized to coin money and must be published from time to time. In Section 9, no money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by law. These words essentially say that the 'the People' must develop 'the USA.' Since the Declaration of Independence says that 'all men are created equal,' all U.S. citizens thus have responsibilities in this development. Accordingly, the Constitution authorized and mandated 'Full Employment' in 'the USA.'

What evidence among the founders and early developers show that 'the USA' would develop an economy based on full employment? George Washington developed a farm research organization at Mount Vernon. (click) Ben Franklin developed knowledge about electricity and developed a stove, but did not patent it. (click) John Adam wrote against the wealthy industrialists. (click) Alexander Hamilton developed a Report of Manufactures that would subsidize industries (click) Henry Clay became the proponent of the American System over the British System. (click) And Abe Lincoln became the first wide development of the South and the West and became major defence of freedom and the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of independence. (click)

Partial employment, instead of full employment, was installed by Congress because Henry Clay's American System was not liked by bankers. The American System is based on 'science and technology' and was applied by President Kennedy on the high technology space program. Science and technology reduces the cost of all economic products as time passes. However, Congress built 'unnatural inflation' and 'unnatural unemployment' into the U.S. economy for the bankers.

Since unnatural inflation and unnatural unemployment cause regular depressions, which make the life of Americans miserable, the People of the USA should develop full employment.

Dearh Panels Are Ungodly

Today, two 'death panels' have emerged. The first panel is the death of new babies and is called 'abortion.' The second panel is the early death of all other humans and is called 'pulling-the-plug.' Both deaths are desired by many Democrats whereas all Republicans reject both deaths. President Obama is following the Democrats.

On the subject of 'death panels;'the Democrats are showing their ignorance of how God acts when He makes every new life and takes every old life. God makes a new life when He unifies a sperm and a womb with a soul. This soul has been given a new functional life by God. God takes an old life when He ends that life, reincarnates that soul, and gives that soul a new functional life. So, 'abortion' and 'pulling-the-plug' is a human act against God.

Death panels violate the Constitution because these panels impede government from making the Union more perfect. More perfections imply improvements of all kinds. So, death plans impede many human developments.

When I worked on the space program to land on the moon, many new technologies emerged. However, this new technology had to be forced into health care system because doctors feared these new technologists and didn't want progress. So, beware of President Obama's 'death panels.'

The People and the U.S. Governmnet are Highly Confused

Independent voters know that something is wrong in the USA. I became an independent voter afrer I discovered that today's political parties are no longer following the U.S founding document, the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution. Last Februrary, information was saying that independent voters were closely divided: 31 percent would choose Republicans; 29 percent would choose Democrats; and 21% were unsure. The rest chose the small parties.

I became an independent voter when I also discovered that U.S. lawyers viewed the Declaration of Independence as an authority for the new nation to go to war against England. With this authority, the USA entered into the Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. However, the Declaration of Independence has a second authority in the first two paragraphs. as follows:

"When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.""

These two paragraph define the following 'things' and their contents: (1) 'the People' who form a Union; (2) a nation that has the name --- The United States of America; (3) a God who creates; (4) self-evident truths; (5) sciences based on laws of nature; (6) morals based on laws of Nature's God; (7) unalienable human rights that come from God; (8) equal human rights that come from God; and (9) instituting a government. As seen, these two paragraphs form the 'privare sector' before the 'public sector' is formed by the U.S.. government. The private sector and public sector actually forms the social contract of John Locke.

The Democrats and Republicans do not recognize 'things' and their contents in the DOI. This is why 'the People' and the U.S. governmnet are destroying the USA. The recent reading of the Constitution, without reading the DOI, by the Republicans is proof that the 'the People' and the U.S. government are highly confused.

The Causes That Separate the Republicans and. Democrats

Political parties in any nation under God should never be separated widely like the U.S. Republican and Democratic parties. Political parties should only discuss very similar ideas. These similar ideas are different, but are normal, because God gave all humans the potentials to find new ideas.

Unfortunately, the Republicans and Democrats have become separated greatly because many new ideas have emerged since modern science appeared. One of the ideas that emerged in the 1820s was called progressivism. Today, progressivism has become a political thought about socialism. To the Democrats, progressivism favors social changes in the USA through the action of government. This political thought is opposed by Republicans (or conservatism) because they limit government and reject socialism.

In the 20th century, progressivism was proposed or moved forward by presidents, such as Teddy Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and William Clinton. These Democrats were opposed by the presidents Hoover, Reagan, George H.W., and George W. Bush.

When I look into the early history of the USA, the causes of the early separation of the members of Congress become clear. The causes of some of these separations are as follows:

(1) Death of Alexander Hamilton and the development of competition among corporations instead of developing cooperation .
(2) No response to President John Adams questions on the growing wealth of business owners.
(3) Rejection of Henry Clay's call for American System of Economics.
(4) Rationalizing slavery, the Civil War, and the assassination of Abe Lincoln.
(5) Developing the rights of the States when only humans have rights.
(6) Developing the West without unifying the national goals.
(7) Authorizing the unlimited wealth and inheritance of the Big Families.
(8) Developing national money and big banks.

These causes affected the U.S. families because they (1) lost the thoughts of our founders, (2) lost the Laws of Nature and Nature's God in the Declaration of Independence, and (3) lost the freedom that God gave them. I conclude that these losses turned many citizens and the U,S, government away from God and developed new political groups that separated the Republicans and the Democrats greatly. Today, I conclude that this great separation is being sold by Sarah Palin, and the new Tea parties.

In the 21 century, science is correcting the above losses with new research on God. For instance, we found that God exists. In this finding, no religion was established and no scripture was needed. So, atheism can now be removed from every nation. This new research is also trying to determine whether God is inactive or active. Since my research has determined that God is active, U.S. citizens can begin to inform their representatives of their opinions about God. My research will develop two new political parties.

This new research is finding other facts. For instance, research has found that our sun will darken. Jesus Christ taught this fact in Matthew at Ch, 24. The darkening of the sun is consistent with other scriptural data. For instance, scriptures tell us that our foods have been degenerating ever since animals and humans appeared on planet earth. This degeneration might explain human problems such as autism, cancer, and the need for transplants.

My research concludes that the ideology of the Democrats is flawed scientifically. For instance, human freedom is not absolute. Only God's freedom is absolute. The Democrats must thus learn that abortion is an ungodly human behavior. The sperm and womb are unified by immortal souls. God made these souls and I found that they are indivisible things.

The Republican ideology is also flawed scientifically. For instance, the free market economy is not responding to the problem of food degeneration. Limiting government is also irrational because the U.S. government has developed many experts. For instance, the U,S. Department of Agriculture has many experts in the development of fruit and vegetables. This department has also reduced the farm labor from 70% of the U.S. population to 2 %. The U.S. government created more energy and must even create more energy because we must leave this planet before the sun darkens. To reduce government and health care is going the wrong way.

When the citizens of the USA turned their thinking away from God, Congress, the Supreme Court, and the White House changed the USA. Now, these citizens must restudy the founding documents and develop the nation that the founders sought. And, government must create a financial system in which money becomes the 'means' of life for all citizens and never becomes the 'end' for the life of a few citizens.

Introduction to Spiros Kakos of Athens, Greece

I have become a reader of the philosophical and scientific work in Athens, Greece by Spiros Kakos. He is publishing excellent material at http://harmonia-philosophica.blogspot.com/ and at http://knol.google.com/k/the-limits-of-science#.

At his blogspot website, Kakos discusses apples and the use of money and vaccines on the problem of autism. The ancient apples are very interesting to me because I believe that the ancient apples were better than the apples we eat today. My line of reasoning is based on the words of Jesus Christ told us in Matthew (Ch. 24) that our sun will eventually darken and bury planet earth. So, humans must keep moving to better planets.

Here, there is a story: when we look at are politicians and national leaders, we can only find ignorance and degeneration.

Republicans vs. Democrats

On July 1, 1776, the Lee Resolution was considered by the colonists and the First Continental Congress. The Lee Resolution contained three parts: a declaration of independence, the formation of foreign alliances to win independence, and 'a plan of confederation' to create a viable nation from the 13 States after independence. Words about this viable nation was defined in the Declaration of Independence, which also authorized the Revolutionary War. The Declaration of Independence was approved on July 4, 1776.

By July 1775, Ben Franklin had outlined a plan of union. It was entitled 'Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union. On July 12, 1776, Franklin's plan was drafted by John Dickerson. Franklin's union was called 'The United States of America.' Dickenson's Draft provided for a Congress in which each State was represented in proportion to its population. In 1781, the union was perfected again with the Articles of Confederation. The union was perfected again in 1788, when the Constitution was created. From 1791 to 1976, twenty five Amendments were added to the Constitution. It is clear that 'The USA' will be perfected continuously with (1) the U.S. founding documents, (2) the Laws of Nature, (3) the Laws of Nature's God, and (4) the social contract of John Locke.

Today, Republicans believe in personal responsibility, limited government, free markets, individual liberty, traditional American values, personal goals and personal problem solving, and a strong national defense. Today, Democrats believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. Government should solve social problems and be sure that no one is in need. (click)

Clearly, the Republican ideology is very different than the thoughts of the founders. This difference can change 'the USA' drastically and increase slavery. However, many republican ideas can be challenged because they use too much logic, not enough metaphysics, and hardly consider God when dealing with personal goals.

On the other hand, the Democratic ideology is aligned to the thoughts of the founders and to the many gifts of God. So, the Democratic ideology will not change 'the USA' and would reduce slavery. However many democratic ideas can also be challenged because they also use too much logic, not enough metaphysics, and hardly consider God when dealing with national goals.

It is clear that the Republicans and Democrats have come to a point in the development of 'the USA'. The questions are now clear: Will 'the USA' maintain itself as a 'union' with God? Or will 'the USA' change itself and become a 'free-for-all' without God?

How the Republicans and Democrats Can Be Uunified

Today, the Republicans and Democrats cannot be unified because they have developed 'opposing' ideas and cannot develop 'functional' ideas that would unite them and the three branches of the U.S. government. If these opposing ideas are not destroyed, 'the People' could impeach government workers or go to war to divide the USA. In this blog, I show the origin of these 'killer' opposing ideas.

In the USA, opposing ideas began to develop after the English language was chosen by one vote over the German language to become the national language of the USA. This choice gave all Americans 'logical minds' because the English language is filled with the opposing ideas of Aristotle. So, English logic, such as good/bad, right/wrong, God/no God, and free/slavery, capital/communism, etc. began to fill the minds of all Americans.

Since Thomas Jefferson spoke of Plato as a mystic, I believe that Jefferson influenced this American vote in favor of the English language. However, had the German language been chosen, the American mind would be filled with Plato's ideas and our minds would use logic only when we made nonliving things such as autos, TVs, etc. However, when we use the English language,we are forced to use logic, even when we discuss human life. Here is where the many useless arguments occur in Congress, married couples, children, businesses, nations, etc.

When a nation decides to shift from Aristotle's logical ideas to Plato's ideas, 'variables' can be formed by the human mind. For instance, to the good/bad opposites, the Platonic mind can form an infinite number of middle ideas in between these two extremes. This is how variables are created by good scientists Variables reveal provable sciences. Unfortunately, most Americans do not understand variables and their provable sciences. However, many American scientists still do not limit their logical thinking. Instead, these scientists close their minds to Plato's ides, become atheists, and teach people how to to live with logic. Many atheists are found in The Reason Project.

It is a pity that many Republicans and Democrats have well developed logical minds. Thus, they have become criminals but do not know their criminality. Yet they have gone against the founding documents and believe that the USA is not a nation under God. In order to develop a national government that functions for God and the founding documents, 'the People' must impeach them as mandated by the Constitution, Article II, Section 4.

If a Republican or Democrat says that the capitalism and communism are opposites, he or she have developed a logical mind and can't see the infinite number of economic ideas that exist in between these extremes. So, a free market economy is not the only 'game in town.' Or if a Republican or Democrat says that freedom and slavery are opposites, he or she can't see the infinite number freedoms that exist in between these extremes.

Political power is the ugliest idea that man can seek because if God exists, only God has power. Since God is being proven almost every day now, Republicans and Democrats must recognize their ignorance before the People act.

Information About U.S. Democrats

The U.S. Democrats are liberal. According to The StudentNewsDaily, a liberal believe in government action to achieve equal opportunity and equality for all. (click) It is the duty of the government to alleviate social ills and to protect civil liberties and individual and human rights. The liberal also believes that the role of the government must guarantee that no one is in need. Thus, liberal policies generally emphasize the need for the government to solve problems. Thus, the Democrats believe in God and say that the USA is a nation under God. To be consistent with God, the Democrats follow the founding documents and apply the social contract of John Locke to form a more perfect Union as mandated in the Preamble of the Constitution.

Just like the Republican Party says that the USA in not a nation under God, but has believers in God, the Democratic Party says that the USA is a nation under God, but has atheists. So just as some Republican believers apply the teachings of particular religions to politics, some Democratic atheists reject particular religious teachings. Accordingly, the division of Republicans and Democrats is caused by the theory of God, which was developed by the founders, and was rejected by the Republicans.

The Democrats follow President Lincoln, President Roosevelt, President Kennedy, President Clinton, and President Obama. A major difference between the Republicans and Democrats after WWII is caused by different economic theories. The Republicans favor a trickle-down through the top wealthy citizens and banks whereas the Democrats favor a trickle-up through labor.

On brain research, Democrats say that criminals can be corrected. So, the Democrats do not equate mind to brain, as Republicans do.

As seen, the Democrats and Republicans have become very different after the assassination of Abe Lincoln.