Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Thursday, November 30, 2006

The Truth About Atheism

Today’s mysteries of the world’s religions are problematic in that an increasing number of people are casting doubts about God’s existence. This doubting is not good for humankind because the minds of a doubter must turn toward atheism and the ways it rationalizes evils. Today, the rationalizations of evils are increasingly found in the moneyed and criminal classes and in political movements such as the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU).

Fortunately, the founders of the USA knew that atheism would lead ‘the people’ only to a nation of evils. For this reason, they developed a social contract under God among the founding colonists. This godly social contract was expressed in the Declaration of Independence. The founders also made a second social contract. With this social contract,they defined our government and called it it the US Constitution. Unfortunately, both of these social contracts are being violated by certain Americans. For instance, the Declaration of Independence is not treated as a ‘law of the land.’ And, the US Supreme Court has removed God from the US government. These two illegal actions have removed God from the USA and turned the USA over to the bandits of atheism.

The mysteries promoted by the religions must be corrected because God is no longer a mystery. This year I published a book --- The First Scientific Proof of God. It proves that God does exist. Further, a higher proof of God’s existence cannot be found because we cannot prove the one absolute truth of God. The only remaining mystery is about the future that God is giving us. We will never know this future completely because life under God is eternal.

The philosophy of atheism must be rejected by all Americans. This rejection can become real by living our independence every day, as the pic expressed.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Old Soldiers Never Die. Nor Do They Fade Away.

Until all humans believe in God and understand Him and the universe, I see no end to wars. So, until atheism is defeated and warring human behaviors come to an end, some humans must do the dirty work of securing nations against those evil people who cause wars and unnatural deaths. For instance, the Iraq War or no other war was caused by God. Wars are man-made by people who are ignorant of God’s Kingdom or have no faith in God as is the case of all atheists. Wars cause military persons to die because they must defend their nation. These military persons will thus save the lives of many people who live at home. Who saves the military persons who live and die on the battleground? These savings are miracles of God.

The Tomb of the Unknown Soldier on the Arlington Cemetery and next to Washington, DC is shown in the pic. The Tomb is a symbol of our respect and honor for those persons who were killed in action and were lost and not buried in a separate grave. This miracle of God assures others that these lost persons will never be lost by God.

Monday, November 27, 2006

Miracles, Continued

In my blog yesterday on miracles, I argued that God is responsible for producing two kinds of miracles. One miracle is the creation of all living and nonliving things that we find in the universe. The second miracle is the new life God gives to us after we die. A third miracle and a fourth miracle can also be identified. The third miracle brings God into the universe as His Son. And the fourth miracle gives the Son a new life after the Son dies.

When God brings His Son into the universe, the Son appears to us as both creator and creature. And, when the Son dies, the Son disappears and reappears as a new creature in the universe on planet earth or on some other planet. As creator and creature, the Son always appears and reappears to humans as a special teacher. As a special teacher, the Son teaches only new and turbulent ideas. I argue that such ideas are divine and were the kind of ideas that Jesus presented. Such divine ideas cause us to improve our senses, feelings, and reasoning. These improvements will cause our lives to change by creating different futures for us. These different futures are necessary because our souls are permanent and function only with changes.

People who dislike change and progress, who promote religious fundamentalism, promote simple living, or who become atheists do not demand or accept the continuous teachings of the Son. These people do not see our future as God’s Kingdom or Heaven. Since the lives of these backward people will continue after their death, the lives of such people will degenerate continually. They will also live in different places of the universe where Hell is maintained by them.

To me, other forms of miracles are imaginary and are not produced by God because a monotheistic God is one, infinite, and active and does not interfer with our freedom. I thus reject the idea of a personal God. I accept a God who micro-manages the idea of the Son, who macro-manages our life, who appears in our world as a divine teacher, and who macro-managing our lives through goals.

This teaching of miracles is different from earlier teachings because people have much more knowledge of God today compared to the knowledge people had during the Middle Ages, during the time of Jesus, and during the time of Moses. This increased knowledge is the result only of the divine work of the Son.

Sunday, November 26, 2006


Although God is unlimited and can create any universe of His choice, when a monotheistic God creates miraculously a universe, He limits His activities in that universe. Thus, on‘’The Language of God’ I discussed in the last blog, I showed that God’s language activities in our universe are limited. One limit is the limit that God must accept when He cannot talk to us as we talk to each other unless He appears in our world. This limit appears because a monotheistic God is one and infinite and must create a multiplicity of related finite things to form any universe.

Thus, in our universe, one should never expect to find laws of Nature that change. For example, the law of gravity should never change. Nor should one ever expect God to change the moral laws in which, for instance, all men are created equal. Nor will God end our universe or create a new universe because God is the same God for all people, past and future. Miracles of God are thus limited. What miracles do God produce?

After considerable thought, I conclude that a monotheistic God is not a personal God. However, I did conclude that God performs miracles, but not during a person’s life. Otherwise, God would be changing our laws of freedom and other laws that govern the nature of all humans. So, I conclude that God conducts only two kinds of miracles: (1) when a person is created and (2) when a person dies. Such miracles become possible only if the universe is formed by immortal spiritual atoms. Only if spiritual atoms are used to form a universe, can God can give humans their initial lives and all other lives after death. I thus believe that the spiritual atoms that I use in my book on ‘The First Scientific Proof of God’ are the only means through which God ca produce miraculous work.

The pic indicates that we do not understand the reality of human death.

Thursday, November 23, 2006

The Language of God

When former President, Bill Clinton, was seeking funds from Congress for the International Human Genome Project, he said, “We are learning the language in which God created life. ” Since the learned language of this Project created a symbolic language for the field of biology, was saying that this language in biology is part of that language of God that expressed His Intelligent Design of the universe. Let me explain how our languages and God's languages work together.

The learned language for biology is a ‘scientific language.’ However, our scientific languages are also ‘talking languages’ because information in a scientific language can be communicated to all humans. So, we must ask, ‘Is a scientific language we learn also a scientific language of God?’ If we say ‘yes,’ we must conclude that God is the greatest scientist. However, if the greatest scientist is also a monotheistic God, the greatest scientist is not able to communicate His scientific information as we communicate with each other because e God exists in a higher world than ours and does not talk discursively as we do. Thus, to communicate His information, God must be a ‘creator.’ The purpose of creating a world of life is thus very clear. By creating, God is sharing His knowledge and power with us.

When I learned how to prove scientifically that God exists, the symbols that I used to express this proof is a proven language of God. Learning and proving languages are the only ways that people can share information with God. Even the linguistic statements in any scripture must be learned and proven in order to communicate with God.. In my book on The First Scientific Proof of God, I also conclude that God does intervene into the progress of man’s development. This intervention teaches us. Further, in the Bible at Rom. 1:20, Paul is telling us that we learn God’s languages by investigating the things God created.

It is clear that all human beings must have some understanding of science. It seems as though every nation must increase the number of scientists continually because God's science can not be completed. So, theism and materialism are major enemies of mankind.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

The First National Thanksgiving Proclamation in the USA

Whereas, it is the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God, to obey His will, to be grateful for His benefits, and humbly to implore His protection and favor; Whereas, both the houses of Congress have, by their joint committee, requested me "to recommend to the people of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer, to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many and signal favors of Almighty God, especially by affording them an opportunity peaceably to establish a form of government for their safety and happiness!"

Now therefore, I do recommend next, to be devoted by the people of the states to the service of that great and glorious being, who is the beneficent Author of all the good that was, that is, or that will be, that we may then all unite in rendering unto Him our sincere and humble thanks for His kind care and protection of the people of this country.

George Washington, 1779

Monday, November 20, 2006

The New World That People Want Is on the Stage

Those people who are in power do not look into the future because they like the present world and do not want it to change. But, the truth is that most people ask, “What is wrong with the world today.” They seek answers to this question and today’s highly irrational world and seek a new world.

I expect a new world to emerge soon because a powerful cause that can bring it into existence is here. This powerful cause is currently being formed by three critical books that distinguish clearly the real differences between atheism and theism. The primary arguments of atheism are that God does not exist and God cannot be proven. The primary arguments of theism are that there is evidence that God exists and God has been proven. Since atheism and theism are opposing ideas, they cannot coexist long.

On one side, the book, "The God Delusion," is written by Richard Dawkins of England. It distinguishes clearly the position of atheism. See my review of this book. Click. On the other side, the book, "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence For Belief," is written by the American, Francis Collins. It presents evidence of a supernatural God. Also, see my review of this book. CLick. Also, on the other side, the book, "The First Scientific Proof of God," is written by me and presents a scientific proof of God, the highest level of proof that man can present.Click.

The leaders of towns, small cities, big cities; high schools, colleges, universities; and State, local, and federal governmental agencies must initiate and begin the discussion of these two opposing camps of though. These discussions cannot be set aside by the fence-sitters because atheism and theism cannot both be true. Nor can they coexist among humans in any nation.

Saturday, November 18, 2006

My Comments on Richard Dawkins' Book on "The God Delusion"

Dawkins did a great job of presenting the current scientific position of atheism. Click. His book can guide the debates between believers and nonbelievers. It is nice to hear Dawkins say that his mind is open if God’s existence is proven. His book is thus timely because my first scientific proof of God’s existence did arrive at Internet book stores this summer. Click. A scientific proof of God’s existence was possible earlier because the ‘scientific method’ was found during the Renaissance. However, at that time, Science and Theology were becoming two distinct fields of thought.

Unfortunately, this separation silenced the flow of significant scientific thoughts about God beginning with Abraham. This flow passes through personalities such as Moses, Plato, Jesus Christ, Constantine, Nicholas of Cusa, Leibniz, Cantor, and Cassirer. It is obvious that Dawkins missed this flow. Because of this separation, the theory of God was transformed from a scientific subject into an irrational mystery. Fortunately, this separation and mystery were overcome when competent English translations of the work of Nicholas of Cusa appeared in 1979 by Dr. Jasper Hopkins of the University of Minnesota. After 25 years of research, my scientific proof of God emerged from this flow of scientific thoughts. But, Dawkins was correct to say that a proof of God would reveal a very different view of the world. A new and very different life for humans can be expected.

A scientific proof of God transforms the fields of science and theology into a single field of thought. A single symbolic language thus unifies them. All people must change. For instance, religions must think scientifically. And, science must think godly. In more detail, Dawkins must accept God as a multiplicity of unified symbols. The religious Trinity is thus changed to a scientific Trinity so that God is connected to the universe rationally and logically. Dawkins must also recognize that God and the universe (1) are one, (2) have no beginning, and (3) have no end. Finally, Dawkins must accept Michael Behe’s concept of irreducible complexity because no atom of the universe is free. Thus, no atom can be useful on its own.

Thursday, November 16, 2006

Why US Governments Are Not Solving the Nation’s Crime Problem

In yesterday’s blog, I show that all crime comes from flaws in the human mind. I showed that Jesus Christ also taught this fact. With today’s knowledge, I also showed that these flaws come from the flawed symbols we create and use to talk and build knowledge.

US governments are not solving the crime problem because they do not know about the cause of crime above. Without this knowledge, our governments tell us that crime cannot be solved. To appease ‘the people,’ our governments tell us that acceptable levels of crime exist and that we must learn how to live with these levels. To develop these acceptable levels, the Republicans say that more criminals must be caught and put into jail, after which the key must be thrown away. The Democrats say that some criminals can be corrected and that methods of correction must be developed.

Governments can learn about the real cause of crime, but only if they believe in God. With the belief in God, one learns that the human mind is a spirit, not the brain. One also learns that our minds can perceive and conceive and that these perceptions and conceptions can form symbols into perfect ‘talk languages’ and ‘knowledge languages.’ These perfected languages will prevent crime. However, if a government is not allowed to act under God, its people must learn how to live with crime. So, the people of a nation can decide how to live, either under crime and without God or without crime and with God.

Today’s rising crime rates and their diversity is a subject that politicians do not want to discuss because they have no solution to crime. And, since many politicians are not believers in God and atheism is growing, only a major effort of ‘the believing people’’can save the USA from the forthcoming high levels of evilness.

Wednesday, November 15, 2006

Crime and Its Root Cause

Criminology, the study of crime and its cause, is being taught in more colleges and universities today after crime rose abnormally in the 1960s. But, the cause of crime and the cause of this rise are still unknown. In Part IIb of my book --- The First Scientific Proof of God --- I show that Jesus Christ showed us the cause of crime over 2000 years ago by Jesus Christ. Today, I wonder why Christians have not revealed this teaching of Christ to our political, justice, and educational systems.

This teaching is found in the Bible at Mark 7:15. There, Jesus says, “There is nothing from without a man that entering into him can defile him: but the things that come out of him, those are they that defile the man.” Then, at Mark 7: 21-22, Jesus says, “For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murder, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness.” In these words, Jesus was telling us that a thing within us causes all evils. Clearly, this thing in us is our mind.

Obviously, Jesus was aware of the nature of our minds and knew that our minds are imperfect and can thus create evil thoughts. Since our minds conceive the realities of God and the universe by creating symbolic languages, our minds and the symbols we use are the cause of all evilness. So, all crime is coming from the symbols that form our ‘talking’ and ‘scientific’ languages.

In 1988, I speculated that all crime is coming from a common cause --- our symbolic languages. Then, after I restudied the teachings of Jesus in the late 1990, I found that Jesus is confirming my speculation on crime. Since Jesus’ teaching of evilness in Mark was not practiced in any nation, I decided to restudy and reinterpret the New Testament. This restudy and reinterpretation led to the book above on the proof of God. Apparently, the ancient and literal interpretations of the New Testament are flawed.

Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Why We Must Make English the Only National Language of the USA

All nations must have a national language because people need a common language with which to communicate and build knowledge with sciences. When the USA began in 1776, it was natural for Americans to use the English language because most of the colonists came from England. Today, the USA has used the English language for 230 years. The English language in the USA is thus widely developed.

Ever since 1776, new immigrants recognized the importance to learn the English language. For this reason, my German parents never used the German language in front of me or my sister. Apparently, today’s immigrating parents want to change this well recognized procedure by imbedding the Spanish language into the English language. This change is being rejected by more and more US towns. And, I agree with these towns for scientific reasons.

Many new ideas, new sciences, and new technologies have already been imbedded in the English language by citizens of the USA. This newness has made the USA a leading world nation in philosophy, science, education, and economics. Since the Spanish-speaking nations have not progressed as English-language nations have, it is thus inappropriate to embed the Spanish language into the USA or in any other progressive nation. If a non-progressive language is imbedded in a progressive language, the non-progressive language can expect to develop a new lower class of people in that progressive nation.

Sunday, November 12, 2006

Atoms Combine to Form All Things We Find in the Universe

For thousands of years, philosophers have sought the fundamental elements that form all things in the universe. Empedocles (484-.424 BC) was the first to identify these elements as earth, water, air, and fire. Eventually, these elements were called atoms and were defined as divisible things, which can not be divided. So, the atoms became known as indivisible things, which combine to form divisible things. Democritus (460-370 BC) was the leader the ancient Atomists. Using logic, the atom is ‘full’ and the vacuum is empty.’ Epicurus (340-270 BC) said that invisible atoms move freely in a vacuum and produce visible things when they combine. Almost two thousand years would pass before man would pursue the atom again.

A modern atom was offered by John Locke of England. His atoms are indivisible and physical. Thus, they have mass, density, hardness, and qualities that can be sensed. Another modern atom was offered by Gottfried Leibniz of Germany. He calls the atom a monad. His monads are indivisible and non physical and thus have no mass, density, or hardness and cannot be sensed.

The modern physical sciences have followed Locke. Their initial efforts have found the chemical atoms such as hydrogen and oxygen. Since chemical atoms are divisible and cannot be called atoms, today’s physical scientists are seeking indivisible atoms in 1-D strings, which have physical properties. Based on the theory of chaos/order, the strings become a reality when 3D space and time become a reality in the Big Bang theory. This world theory is purely physical, has no God, and must end. This work is supported by US government funds.

I prove the existence of God in my book --- The First Scientific Proof of God. In this book, I also apply the monads offered by Leibniz. I change his monads to spiritual atoms so that I can speak of God’s creation as a spiritual/physical world. My application of Leibniz’s monads produces a highly rational and eternal world, which is also consistent with the teachings of Jesus Christ. But, godly theories, for instance, my theory, receives no funds from the US government.

The operation of the US government is indeed very strange.

Saturday, November 11, 2006

God vs. Science

A spirited debate between atheistic Biologist, Richard Dawkins, and Christian geneticist, Francis Collins, is presented in the Nov. 13, 2006 (Vol. 168, No. 20) issue of TIME Magazine. The debate is between Dawkins’ belief in Darwinian evolution and Collin’s Christian belief that biological evolution contradicts the Book of Genesis. Dawkins’ popular book against God is ‘The God Delusion.’ And, Collin’s recent supporting book is ‘The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief.’

I conclude that this debate has no winner because Dawkins and Collins seem to be unaware of the work of those believers who have extended their thoughts beyond the thoughts one will find in the Book of Genesis. For instance, the Being (God) and Becoming(universe) of Plato, the teachings of Jesus Christ, the development of the Christian Trinity, the negative theology of Nicholas of Cusa, the Monadology of Gottfried Leibniz, and the prime and transfinite numbers of Riemann and Cantor will take any scientist well beyond the thoughts one will find in the Genesis. These widely accepted works cannot be eliminated in any debate on the subject God vs. Science. All of these works are discussed in my new book, The First Scientific Proof of God.

Apparently, Dawkins, Collins, and TIME magazine are not up-to-date on man’s effort to unify science and theology. In my book, science and theology form one field of thought. This means that God and science are merely different parts of the same box.

Friday, November 10, 2006

Reincarnation and Resurrection, Continued

Yesterday, I opened a discussion of the theory of reincarnation and included my theory of resurrection. I defined reincarnation as a life after death on the same planet. And, I defined resurrection as a life after death on a planet in a different galaxy. Here, I will expand my thoughts on these two theories based on specific teachings of Jesus Christ.

The theory of reincarnation is based on Christ’s teaching in the Bible at John 3:3, which says, ‘I say unto thee Except a men be born again, he cannot see the Kingdom of God.’ To see God’s Kingdom, one must sense phenomena of God’s Kingdom and transform these phenomena into knowledge of this Kingdom. This is the process of science. Since knowledge of God’s Kingdom grows but can never be completed, all humans must be reincarnated eternally. So, human life continues forever. Today, many people seek only power and wealth. Others seek knowledge of God’s Kingdom. For instance, they seek knowledge of the (1) infrastructure of life, such as found in stones, water, suns, and energy fuel, and (2) life, such as found in plants, animals, and humans Yet, all humans live after death. Since a monotheistic God is wise, the theory of reincarnation gives life after death and favors the growth of knowledge over the growth of power and wealth. This favoring insures that all people are able to see the Kingdom of God. So, people need not lie underground in a coffin after death waiting for the sun to die.

The theory of resurrection is based on Christ’s teaching in the Bible at Matthew, Chapter 24. There, Christ tells us that the sun darkens and that we will see signs of the sun’s darkening. The signs are that the sun seems to be falling out of heaven and the stars in heaven seem to be shaking. When these signs are seen, planet earth will slowly fall into the hot sun where it becomes fuel for the sun’s nuclear furnace. When the sun darkens, Christ says that some people will be saved, just like Noah used a boat to save living things during a bad flood on planet earth. I conclude that this saving is a necessary act of God to save the level of knowledge that man has gained on planet earth. So, although life begins on a new planet in a new galaxy, human knowledge of God’s Kingdom does not begin on the new planet. Since human life never ends, human knowledge of God’s Kingdom grows continually, no matter where man lives.

My theory of recarnation is based on my belief that space flight is limited to flights within a galaxy. On the other hand, my theory of resurrection is based on my belief that only God can move a spiritual atom from one galaxy to another galaxy Thus, I do not believe that a reincarnation process and resurrection process would be possible without spiritual atoms and the teaching of by Christ on these two theories.

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Reincarnation and Resurrection

Ancient people who lived on the Nile River buried their people with food because they thought that death led to a new life on the other side of the Nile River. Today, people are thinking and singing more about life after death. However, the huge size and continued expansion of the universe and our continued growth of knowledge are changing out thoughts about life after death. These factors are increasing our doubts about the religious teaching of God’s judgment and the separation of people into Heaven and Hell. Especially, scientific minds are increasing their doubts about this religious teaching.

I deal with the subject of life after death in my modern creation theory. I present this theory in Part IV of my book on The First Scientific Proof of God. Like other scientists, I use atoms to form the universe. But, to my knowledge, only I use spiritual atoms to form the universe. By using spiritual atoms, I form a universe that has spiritual and physical aspects.

All spiritual atoms perceive. They are immortal, invisible, and indivisible. They combine lawfully and logically to form mortal, visible, and divisible things. The things are those things that God decided to include in His Intelligent Design of the universe. Since all things are mortal, they die. However, since all spiritual atoms are immortal, they merely are separated from the things they form. Some atoms separate quickly whereas others separate slowly. Since God is eternal, all spiritual atoms, because they are immortal, cause life to exist in the universe eternally.

I did not have sufficient time to conduct proper research on the things God includes in His Design. But, I went far enough to conclude that God creates eternally and is active continuously in the life He created. I also concluded that God is a macro-manager of the universe because He decided to create a free form of life by including intelligence in the human species. Thus, I conclude that both a reincarnation theory and a resurrection theory will be found eventually by man. The reincarnation theory would apply only to life on the same planet whereas the resurrection theory would apply to life between different galaxies.

Since reincarnation could be found as a Law of the Nature of Man and resurrection, as a Law of Nature’s God, the people of planet earth should realize that they will live forever and could be reborn anywhere on planet earth. So making planet earth beautiful and liveable by all people should be a world level goal and priority.

Wednesday, November 08, 2006

How to Exercise Your Mind in the Higher World

Some people find it difficult to establish a continuous relationship with God because they use their sensual appratus too much. When this over-use occurs the thinking appratus that develops our spirituality is under-developed and hardly used. Your spiritually is developing properly when someone in your environment makes a statement and you must ask him or her to repeat it. You missed the open words of the statement because you were thinking. Thinkers about God-related subjectst are deep thinkers. Today, I received the words below from a friend. They show you how you can exercise your mind, increase your spiritually, and learn about God's promises. George

Here’’s an exercise for today:

Please write down Switch to the Higher World. This means that you now have an authentic spiritual aim. It involves self-work, self-honesty, a self-wish to rise above yourself. To switch to the higher world means to abandon the lower world. It means you want to be on higher ground, and that you first recognize where you were, recognize what your thoughts are thinking all day long, look at them, examine them, catch yourself going into hostility, into depression, into moodiness.

Switch to the Higher World will become a very real and practical exercise. Start with doing it once, then you'll want to do it twice, three times, and you'll want nothing more than to go through your whole twenty-four hours seeing yourself in the wrong place and realizing you must switch to the Higher World.

Stop Blaming Anyone

Will you simply say to yourself as a spiritual exercise, ““Never, never again will I blame anyone for anything.”” That includes Papa of twenty years ago, Mama of five or thirty years ago. They’’ve still got you unfortunately. Also, the ex-wife, ex-husband —— stop blaming and lacerating yourself so that now you can think about how mean and stupid you are, and thereby keep a false identity going.

You are either building your false identity, which is tormenting you, or you’’re dissolving it through spiritual insight, one or the other, you can’’t have both.

Live in such a way that those who know you but don't know God, will come to know God because they know you.

Rev. Sandi Lee, M.Msc.

Monday, November 06, 2006

A General History of Man’s Thoughts on God and the Universe

Once one knows the history of man’s thoughts on the subjects of God and the Universe, one’s belief or disbelief in God becomes clearer. In the Western world, the first belief was polytheism. This is a belief that God created the universe by becoming the things He created. All things thus became idols and were worshiped. Polytheism was replaced by the monotheism of Abraham. Moses describes monotheism in the Genesis of the Old Testament saying that God created the universe in six days after which God rested on the 7th day. Since God is timeless, the six days represent the initial phase of God’s creation of the universe. And, rest represents a new phase of the creation.

A new phase was detected by Christians when Jesus Christ taught them and said, “I and my Father are one.’ This saying allowed man to view a monotheistic God scientifically. This saying became the Christian Trinity in 325 A.D. --- Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Then, in 1440, Nicholas of Cusa converted the Trinity to science --- one, equality, and union. Then, in 2006, I prove scientifically that God exists and connect God to all things in the universe logically — many, different, and related. Since the universe is constructed out of spiritual atoms, the origin of nonliving and living things are known. Using numbers, we see that God and the universe are unfolded through the Trinity with the triangle numbers 1, 3, 6, 10, ... etc.

In the 17th century, the universe became godless when Isaac Newton created a Euclidean universe. His universe led to many followers and initiated the 18th century Enlightenment. But, in the 19th century, Bernhard Riemann (1826-1866) prepared a new paper ‘On the Hypothesis Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry.’ This paper says that Non-Euclidean geometries exist. Based on Riemann’s paper, Albert Einstein developed his famous relativity theory, which destroyed Newton’s Universe. Today, new godless theories of the universe are sought by astrophysicists. Examples are the Big Bang, string, and order/chaos theories. Further, a godless theory is being sought by biologists to explain all living things. But, the origin of living things cannot be explained, In my book on The First Scientific Proof of God, I say that all things in the universe have their origin in God. Furthermore, all godless theories have something in common --- the universe has an end. But, a universe, which has an active monotheistic God, has no end.

Since there is no fence on which you can stand, what is your choice, a universe with God or a universe without God?

Friday, November 03, 2006

An Invitation to Mathematicians and Astrophysicists

In my October 28, 2006 blog, I discussed ‘A System Approach to God and the Universe.’ I wrote this blog to inform people throughout the world that God and all things in the universe form a single world, which is eternal and has no end. I describe this single world in great detail in my recent book on ‘The First Scientific Proof of God.’ Now, I wish that I would have given this book the title I gave to this October blog because the First Scientific Proof of God is the foundation of the universe and reveals many related truths about the universe and human life.

Lately, I have been reading on the progress of the field of mathematics on the subject of the ‘Riemann Hypothesis.’ (See, for example, ‘Stalking the Riemann Hypothesis’ by Dan Rockmore of Dartmouth College.) Riemann’s Hypothesis deals with the prime numbers, which were identified by our mathematicians. The primes are numbers like two, three, five, and seven; are divisible only by one or itself; and cannot be reduced. For instance, the number 6 is not a prime because it can be reduced to ‘two times three.’

The Riemann Hypothesis says that all primes are connected by a law. This law is known as the ‘Riemann zeta function.’ Riemann generated his zeta function on the S-plane, which is constructed with complex numbers. (Two S-planes are shown on p. 222 of my book and display the non-Euclidean world of two different electrical devices.) Riemann connects all prime numbers with zeta zeros. Thee discontinuities do not affect the continuity of the integers. The Riemann Hypothesis tells us that the prime numbers cannot be exhausted. This lack of exhaustion implies that God, who cannot be exhausted, must exist.

Rockmore tells the reader that mathematicians are failing to prove the Riemann Hypothesis (as a tool of evolutionary theory); are failing to link the ideas of chaos (uncertainty) and order (certainty) by using the quantum mechanics of particle physics and classical mechanics; and are failing to prove that the universe is 4-D (space and time).

Thus, I want to invite mathematicians and astrophysicists to consider my system approach to God and the universe. Specifically, I invite them to give thoughts to the monadology of Gottfried Leibniz In my book, I rename Leibniz’s monads to spiritual atoms. I also unify all of the spiritual atoms, which cannot be destroyed by Nature, and thus create a single universe. Since some of the spiritual atoms are dominating, I ask our mathematicians and astrophysicists whether the prime numbers are the foundation of God’s Intelligent Design of the physical infrastructure that supports life throughout the universe.

Since Riemann was a believer in God, might Riemann’s zeta function not be one of those ‘bad mathematical infinities’ that Georg Cantor would turn to something positive --- a transfinite number?

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Life’s Logical and Functional Relations

My continued research on Religion and Science has revealed new trends that people are developing as a result of their divisions. Three examples of this division are (1) believers V. nonbelievers, (2) rich V. poor, and (3) freedom V. totalitarianism. The believers and nonbelievers are separated logically. Thus, a person either is a believer or is not a believer. The other two divisions were separated logically by history’s rulers. Today, these two divisions are shedding their ‘logic relations’ and are becoming ‘functional relations.’ The old economic classes, rich and poor, are thus being modernized. For instance, free nations have developed a ‘middle economic class.’ And, the socialists in the free nations are going further by developing a ‘middle political class’ known as the Third Way. The middle political class is being developed by people such as former US President Clinton and England’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair. As seen, these opposing and functional relations have nothing to do with mathematics, numbers, the physical sciences, and evolutionary theory. They have something to do with the rights that God gave to man and the Laws of Nature’s God..

In the Western world, the relations between Religion and Science became logical and separated Religion and Science after modern science emerged and a scientist, Galileo, was imprisoned by the Roman Church. This imprisonment changed the relations between Religion and Science from the functional relation, which existed since the time of Christ to the logical relation --- believers V. nonbelievers. In my new book, The First Scientific Proof of God, I try to show people that (1) God exists, (2) only one religion exists, (3) only one science exists, and (4) Religion and Science form a functional relation, not a logic relation.

Will you please help me convince religions and scientists that everything comes from God and that life is understood initially with logical relations but becomes more beautiful and truthful with function relations? This help can prevent the division of people such as the division that has occurred in the 9/11 pic.