Theological Science* and the U.S. Anti-Socialists

Although the USA was founded as a social democracy, U.S. anti-socialists want to change the body of U.S. laws so that the social aspects of our social democracy would be eliminated. With this change, the teaching of brotherly love by Jesus Christ would also be destroyed.

I was born in the anthracite coal region in the State of Pennsylvania. As a little boy, I saw whole homes fall into these tunnels and saw men die in these tunnels. But I also saw coal leaving the surrounding mountains on trucks, rail, and canal to warm the homes of people hundreds of miles away. Somehow people in these coal regions had to rationalize these ‘home fall ins’ and ‘miner deaths’ with the warm homes of people who lived hundreds of miles away. Then, when oil replaced coal, I saw the growth of ghettos in these coal regions. Today, this coal region has become a pocket of poverty. Today, the U.S. anti-socialists are those Americans who close their minds to these historical facts.

In the late 1950s, as an electrical engineer, I became part of a new group of workers at Martin Marietta Corporation funded by the federal government. Our job was not to warm the homes of people. Instead, our job was to secure all people of USA against the Soviet Union, which had launched ‘Sputnik’ into space recently. This job led engineers to change the way electricity is made and controlled. One change made circuits small and light. Another electrical change shifted electrical circuits from analog into digital. Many businesses, such as Intel and Microsoft, grew out of this government effort and electrical changes Today, U.S. anti-socialists would say that the wealth of Intel and Microsoft would have developed without this 1950s government funding and the work of many engineers. But, they overlook these historical facts.

A nation cannot be built without the togetherness and brotherly love of its people. This is why I will vote for Barack Obama. Obviously, the anti-socialists, such as John McCain and Sarah Palin, are the scum of the USA.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and My Predictions of the New President’s Administration

I believe that the 2008 presidential election debate has distinguished the Democratic and Republican parties clearly for the first time. I conclude that TV and the Internet have produced this new clarity. In this blog, I express my personal predictions of the new presidential administrations.

If the Democratic party wins, I conclude that the power of ‘the people’ will increase greatly and the power of the rich class will decrease. But if the Republican party wins, the power of ‘the people’ will continue to decrease and the power of the rich class will grow. This prediction is based on the current meaning of money defined by the rich class. This economic class views money as an ‘end’ rather than ‘means.’ Stated simply, the rich class says, ‘money talks.’

Because of its ungodly view of money, I believe that the Republican party has turned away from God completely. So, the Republican party is no longer following the Union that the Abe Lincoln saved. But I do not expect John McCain or Sarah Palin to change the Republican party because ‘theological science’ will reject many conservative ideas and Palin’s ‘born again’ Christian view of God. However, theological science concluded that liberal ideas are causing the Democratic party to turn away from God.

Whether the middle and poor economic classes can reject those liberal ideas that are turning the Democratic party away from God will depend on Barack Obama and his administration because the U.S. Supreme Court is quiet on the subject of God. I conclude that the future of the USA depends more on the thoughts of ‘the people’ about God then on the thoughts of any political party and their liberal and conservative ideas or the thoughts of any religion.

In the 15th century, when Germany’s Nicholas of Cusa discovered that God is infinite qua infinite and is thus incomprehensible, the Inquisition was the only religious response. Then, when Ben Franklin was sent to Europe to learn about the discovery of Cusa God, Americans prepared to create a new nation under God. Abe Lincoln was the last U.S. government response to this new nation. Then, when I discovered scientifically that God’s infinity is the origin of all finite things in the universe in 2006, there were no responses from the Bush White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, sciences, or religions.

So, if the next presidential administration of the USA does not consider the importance of these three discoveries, I predict that the development of new sciences in the USA will stop. And when science stops, the Union will fall apart and Civil War II will begin.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* Analyses the Behaviors of the Presidential Candidates As the Debate Ends

As the U.S. presidential debate between Obama and McCain comes to an end, theological science can determine the changing behaviors of the candidates during the debate. Theological science can make such determinations because the mind of humans is formed from symbolic languages. So, when a human speaks, the symbolic language used gives other humans information about that person’s thinking. Only by listening to the debaters, I found that Obama developed the behavior of a concerned president and that McCain developed the behavior of an advertising president.

During the debate, I conclude that Obama became a refined teacher whereas McCain became a refined seller. For instance, when Obama said that 'the top 5% of the people will pay taxes to rebuild the U.S. economy’ and McCain said that 'Obama will increase your taxes' and ‘Obama will redistribute your wealth,’ I conclude that the teacher came out of Obama and the seller came out of McCain.

Lately, McCain is charging Obama with socialism. And some republicans are charging Obama with Marxism. These charges indicate ignorance because that USA was founded as a social democracy and the Bolsheviks and Lenin did not install Marx’s social democracy in the Soviet Union. So, I view Obama as a true American but question McCain’s thoughts about the USA.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and the U.S. Declaration of Independence

U.S. lawyers say that the Declaration of Independence is a declaration of war against England. I disagree because ‘the people’ of the USA did not declare any war, as I point out later. Instead, I say that the Declaration of Independence was a declaration of freedom and the natural rights of ‘the people’ to defend themselves. The Declaration of Independence thus has two authorities. One authority is found in the first two paragraphs and the second authority is found in the remaining words.

The first authority defines the general structure of the ‘one people.’ In the U.S. Constitution, the ‘one people’ was identified as the ‘Union.’ The ‘one people’ became known as the ‘Society’ because it is the first party in the social contract theory of England’s John Locke. Our founders chose this social contract over all other theories at their time. The second party in Locke’s theory is called ‘Government.’ In 1776, ‘Government’ was defined as the Second Continental Congress. Eventually, ‘Government’ was defined in much more detail by the U.S. Constitution. So, the USA had two social contract components in 1776. These components are Society and Government.

The second authority gave the ‘one people’ the right to go to war if England goes to war against the ‘one people.’ So, ‘the people’ defended themselves against England but only after England started the Revolutionary War.

Clearly, the ‘one people’ or Union is a social nation formed of many people. In such a nation, wealth must be shared in rational ways that will produce continuous growth and progress of the nation. So, the redistribution of the wealth of the top 5% of the U.S. citizens proposed by Barack Obama/Joe Biden is rational and follows the founding principles of the USA. On redistribution, Obama and Biden seem to be following the earlier efforts of the anti Federalists and President John Adams. I do not believe that John McCain and Sarah Palin understand the founding of the USA.

It is also clear that ‘the people’ (or Union) has sovereignty. This is why the Declaration of Independence cannot be amended whereas the Constitution can be amended.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* Seeks the Truths About Socialism, Atheism, and Communism

In the presidential debates involving Barack Obama and John McCain in the USA, English dictionaries are confusing U.S. citizens and the meanings of the terms, socialism and communism. The confusion arises because these terms are misused by people who live in a nation under God. When theological science applies these terms to a nation under God, this confusion goes away, as I show below.

Many U.S. citizens do not know that the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution say that the USA is a nation under God. God is clearly mandated in the Declaration of Independence. On the other hand, the mandate of God in the U.S. Constitution is not as clear. But when the founders said that the U.S. government must form a more perfect Union, God’s existence is clear because God is the only standard for measuring this effort of the U.S. government.

Since the term socialism is derived from the terms, social and sociability, the Union identified by the founders is a social Union. The togetherness of all U.S. citizens is necessary to form this Union. Every U.S. citizen is thus a natural socialist. Christianity teaches this social Union as ‘brotherly love.’
Since the USA is a nation under God, this social Union is also godly. In the U.S. Union, God has given every U.S. citizen personal and social responsibilities. These responsibilities are entitled by God and are identified by the founders in the Declaration of Independence as Laws of Nature and Nature’s God. Such laws cannot be developed without sociability.

Thus, to become a worker in the U. S. government that worker must be socialistic. It is thus wrong to charge a potential worker of the U.S. government with socialism. And since a communistic nation has no God, it is illegal to practice atheism and communism in the USA.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Dialectical Thinking, II

In yesterday’s blog, I show that dialectical thinking is used when two opposing terms are not maximally different and God is not unifying them. Thus, it is with a difference of degrees that all things in the universe come from opposing terms that God unifies. Here is where logic shines God’s existence. Accordingly all things in the universe receive compositions from God.

When a composition is received by a thing from God, the thing has more from one term of the composition and less from the other term of the composition. Since God unifies terms is each composition, the concept ‘identity’ is an attribute of God and is not an attribute of any thing in the universe. Contrary to people who say that twins exist in the universe, it is correct to say that no two identical things exist in the universe. A composition in one thing is thus never found in any other thing found in the universe.

Since today’s physical sciences are focused primarily on process rather than objects, our knowledge of the laws of nature about things is hardly known. And contrary to the belief of atheists that all data are sensual, we can seek knowledge of things only with rational thoughts. As many linguists discovered in the 1920s, all sensual data are symbolic.

Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Dialectical Thinking, I

In my recent blog (10/23/08), I discuss the way liberals and conservatives can think dialectically so they can debate their differences without fighting or judging each other. In this blog, I use theological science to generalize this way of debating. I expect dialectical thinking to encourage more U.S. children to graduate from school.

When I published my first book, The First Scientific Proof of God, and opened this website, I was attacked by many logicians, physical scientists, and mathematicians. Most of them rejected God and promoted both atheism and Darwin’s evolutionary theory. They no longer debate me because I think dialectically and logically whereas they think only logically and reject the use of non sequiturs. This is why they are unable to recognize God and God’s creation.

I think dialectically because I use Plato’s negative to reveal positive things, accept the negative theology of Nicholas of Cusa, and accept panentheism, a theory that views God as the creator of a universe, which is not the whole of God’s being. I use Plato’s negative to seek the origin of all of the finite things we find in the universe. So, when I think about negating any finite thing, I think about a different thing. This different thing is a ‘not-finite’ thing and is a positive thing when we define it as an ‘infinite’ thing.’ Since all finite things and an infinite thing coexist, Nicholas of Cusa defines the infinite thing as the monotheistic God. God is spoken of as the ‘Unity of all Opposites’ by Cusa.

However, not all opposites in our dictionaries are unified by God. Only opposites that are maximally different are unified by God. Since the opposing political terms, liberal and conservative, are not maximally different, they are not natural terms and are not unified by God. Plato’s negative is thus important because it creates the natural term, finite and infinite, which are unified by God.

The opposing terms, inside and outside, are natural terms that God unifies. These terms identify things like spheres, cubes, trees, stones, etc. These things are known as things-in-themselves’ and distinguish every thing that God created. I believe that the physical sciences and life science are failing because they focus of physical processes rather than things. They do not understand, for instance, that in a hot thing, what is not-hot is the hot thing.

The opposing terms, hot and cold, began as unnatural terms. They became more natural after other terms, such as warm, cool, tepid were added to the hot/cold terms. All of these terms became natural after scientists found the thermometer and transformed these terms into temperature numbers. Atheistic scientists have also identified the terms, matter and antimatter. They say that these two terms are symmetrical but were separated by a physical explosion. They believe that ‘matter’ formed everything in the universe. I doubt this theory because I conclude that God is the necessary origin of all things found in the universe. I also conclude that both natural and man-made terms are to be found living things so the independence and intelligence of man will form rational lives for all living things.

Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science and the Thoughts of Alan Greenspan

Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve, was recently posted on the Ten Most Wanted CNN list of people who participated in the recent failure of U.S. banks. But Greenspan's participation in this failure has a deeper cause.

In my blog dated 10/12/07, I discuss Greenspan's way of thinking. He is a follower of Ayn Rand, who wrote on objectivism. Rand was tossed out of the Soviet Union for promoting laissez-faire economics. So, Rand came to the USA to promote her ideas and Greenspan became one of her followers.

The laissez-faire economy is better known as the 'free market economy' today. Since a free market economy is not free if it is regulated, the promoters of a free market economy do not want regulations. But this promotion did not consider the growth of man's evilness and greed beginning in the 1960s when the U.S. Supreme Court began to rule in favor of atheism and a drug culture was developing. It seems obvious that neither Greenspan nor free market economists consider God and the natural evils of man in their thoughts.

When will the U.S. government and our political leaders accept God and recognize the need to regulate man? It is clear that the U.S. government does not consider the mandates of the Declaration of Independence and its Laws of Nature and Nature's God. Based on my experience on crime at the U.S. Department of Justice, I believe that it is time for law enforcement to include white collar crime in their priorities.

Theological Science* Investigates the Debates Between Liberals and Conservatives

Today, Americans are distinguishing the Democratic and Republican parties with the terms ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative.’ However, these two terms do not form a perfect pair of excluded middle opposites otherwise we would know precisely ‘what a liberal person is’ and ‘what a conservative person is.’ The tendency of Americans to make imprecise logical terms is the result of their daily use of the English language, which is filled with Aristotle’s logical thinking.

In a ‘liberal’ person, one will thus find some conservative behaviors. And in a ‘conservative’ person, one will also find some liberal behaviors. Since the use of precise opposing terms is small compared to the use of imprecise terms, Americans will continue to divide themselves and fight politically if they do not learn how to think dialectically.

When I use theological science to investigate the debates between ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives,’ I conclude that the many liberals and conservatives have turned away from God and the moral laws of a creator God. God is mandated in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. And all moral laws are defined as ‘Laws of Nature’s God’ in the first paragraph.

So, liberals are right to defend against the conservative belief, that human freedom is limited to choices, with the powerful statement in the Declaration of Independence ‘that all Men are created equal.’ But liberal thoughts can lead to contradictions, for instance, if Mother is allowed to abort a child.

Imprecise terms such as ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’ are necessary to build human communications, sciences, and morals. So, neither liberals nor conservatives can say they are political right or wrong without interacting and discussing with each other. Today’s fighting between liberals and conservatives are ignorant ways of seeking scientific or moral laws and unifying the people of a free nation.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* Investigates the Republican Party and Its Recent History

Yesterday’s blog shows that the Republican president and vice-president candidates, John McCain and Sarah Palin do not know that the U.S. representative democracy is a social Union under God. Instead of reading the founding documents of the USA they develop alternative thoughts such as: (1) free trade rather than fair trade; (2) State rights rather than human rights; (3) deregulation rather than more regulation; (4) trickle-down rather than trickle-up economies; and (5) a personal God (or born again Christian God) rather than a common God of all people. What is the cause of their ignorance about the U.S. democracy and what is the origin of these alternatives? I ask the history of the Republican party to answer these questions.

Through the Nixon administration, I conclude that the Republican party was linked to the Lincoln administration. So, these republicans were really Unionists. This linkage was confirmed when I represented the US Department of Justice to discuss Nixon’s great domestic initiatives at the White House. Nixon’s initiatives were focused on infrastructures and thus were for all citizens. But what was the real cause of the resignation of Nixon? This question might be answered by dirty White House staffers.

Before he became president, I sat close to the late President Reagan on an airplane from Los Angeles. He is a very friendly person. He told us that he came to Washington to talk with people who wanted him to become President. He won and soon signed a new law related to economics. This law caused tax money to trickle-down to Saving and Loan banks. But this law failed and forced the government to bail them out.

This trickle-down economic system was continued by both Bush administrations and will be continued by the McCain/Palin administration because they want to stop the natural increase of brotherly love (or socialism) in the USA. But, if this natural increase of socialism is stopped by the government, the USA can be expected to become a two-class nation like Mexico. Slavery is thus a hidden goal of the trickle-down Republican party economy.

So, I conclude that new republicans separated themselves from the Lincoln administration after Nixon was forced out of office. Some of the new republicans might be atheists because it was in 1967 that the U.S. Supreme Court began to rule more and more in favor of atheism.

Obviously, the 2008 presidential election is a very important political event for the poor and middle classes.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Refining the Democratic and Republican Parties, II

Yesterday, the president and vice-president candidates, John McCain and Sarah Palin, charged Barack Obama with socialism. McCain and Palin said that ‘Joe the Plumber’ also said that Obama was moving into socialism. This charge shows that McCain, Palin, and Joe the Plumber are not up-to-date on the development of political science.

According to Bill Clinton, he and England’s Tony Blair were working together on the unification of democracy and socialism. They spoke of this unification as the Third Way. I assume that they viewed democracy and socialism as ‘thesis’ and ‘antithesis’ and sought their synthesis, the Third Way. Today, the term synthesis has become known by Hegel and Marx as ‘development.’ The three terms are generalized today with the terms--- beginning, middle, and end and are often modeled by a circle in where the circumference is the middle term. Unfortunately, Clinton and Blair were unable to identify the synthesis. Below, I identify the synthesis.

The modernization of political science has been impeded by our lawyers who say that the Declaration of Independence contains only one authority --- to go to war against England. However. I conclude that the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence identify a second authority. This second authority is confirmed in John Locke’s social contract theory, which requires two parties to create a contract. Locke calls one party ‘Society’ and the other party ‘Government.’

The founders were thus correct to define Society in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. Once Society was defined in the Declaration of Independence, the founders defined Government in the Constitution. So, the Declaration of Independence is the highest law in the body of U.S. laws.

The founders unified the terms, Society and Government, by transferring some natural human rights to the Government in exchange for securing Society. Further, the founders say that these natural human rights are not arbitrary. They say that these rights originate in God and exist in our world as two laws --- Laws of Nature and Nature’s God. The Laws of Nature are found by science and the Laws of Nature’s God are found by moralists, who are the people.

So the unification of democracy and socialism can be defined only by the two laws that our founders included in the Declaration of Independence. Accordingly, people are correct to say that ‘ man is freed by laws.’

Thus, it is normal for the people of a new democracy to begin with very few social needs. Farming is thus a major activity in a new democracy. However, as a democracy ages, togetherness must increase because human activities become increasingly functional.

Democracy and socialism begin and end together. The middle region of these extremes is development or the Third Way as Clinton and Blair say. The middle region (or developments) is filled continually with new scientific and moral laws. These filler laws will never be completed because our world was created by an infinite God. Obviously, life continues forever unless God ends it.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Refining the Democratic and Republican Parties, I

The Democratic and Republican parties have degenerated to their lowest point of human thinking. This lowest point of thinking was attained when politicians introduced the method of thought known as ‘the negative.’ Unfortunately, the politicians misused this powerful mental tool immediately.

I believe that the negative is misused because politicians do not know that Plato was the first person to develop and use ‘the negative.’ In his Sophist at 257b Plato says, When we speak of ‘that which is not,’ it seems that we do not mean something contrary to what exists but only something that is different.1 The negative is only a way to shift our mind from one idea to a different idea. The negative is a way to judge ideas. It is not a way to judge a person.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

1. Hamilton, Edith and Huntington Cairns, Editors (1961) Plato -The Collected Dialogues, Princeton: Princeton University Press,. P. 1003.

Theological Science* and the Presidential Debates, III

Theological science is a new science that emerged from my scientific proof of God and God’s real infinity. I expect this new view of God and new science to guide all sciences eventually.

For your information, the economic proposals of Barack Obama are consistent with my new science and the real infinity of God. However, the economic proposals of John McCain are in opposition to them. Further, contrary to Pat Robertson’s approval of McCain’s vice-president selection, I say that Palin’s born-again procedure and personal God are also inconsistent with theological science and the infinity of God.

Based on the Obama/Biden consistencies with the new science and the infinity of God, I can see clearer why they will turn the U.S. economy onto the only path that will solve the gun-butter economic problem. No political party has ever solved this economic problem. The most recent attempts to solve this economic problem are found in the thoughts of Presidents Clinton and Nixon. Earlier, President Kennedy made the first major attempt to solve the butter economy with his moon landing program. His program produced an awesome amount of new sciences and technologies that did find their way into domestic use. But these new sciences and technologies were not only for rich people and company owners. They are for all US citizens.

Today, JFKs new technologies are still appearing and are being used successfully to develop the ‘butter economy’ into a perfect economy. But new problems have emerged. First, the development of new physical sciences and new life sciences are no longer appearing. When widely accepted, theological science will solve this problem. A second problem is the national distribution of high technologies. This problem is not being solved because the ‘old producing organizations’ (mostly republicans) do not like new cultures. A few examples of the new national distribution organizations are Amway, Wal-mart, Home Depot, Mary Kay, and RBC.

Obama will help to perfect the national distribution system by making sure that all citizens have health care. With Obama in the White House, I see a big step forward in the perfection of the butter economy. With McCain and Palin, I see a turn toward the Bush economy, which is a return to the gun economy and Middle East wars.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and the Presidential Debates, II

The presidential debates in the USA have been focused on two different governmental systems of intervening into the U.S. economy --- the trickle-down and trickle-up systems. However, when the stock market fell, the debate turned away from the candidate’s discussions of these two systems. So, our citizens never learned the real truths about these two systems.

Even if the stock market had not fallen, Senator McCain could not discuss the trickle-down system because it had failed during the Reagan and Bushies administrations. So, instead of discussing the merits of his trickle-down system, McCain discussed Obama’s trickle-up system saying that it will redistribute the wealth of the nation. What’s wrong with that?

The senators did talk about the bad reports of our educational system. But, they did not talk about the rise of atheism in a nation under God, the immorality of Hollywood, and the fall of science. In August 2007, I informed Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court about the failure of science, the long term danger of atheism, and the Supreme Court error that eliminates the Declaration of Independence as a law of the land. Although people say that we have a nation under God, the nation has no government under God.

Unfortunately, this unbelievable error is causing many members of the Democratic and Republican parties to turn away from God. Yet,, my new theological science proves the existence of God and also proves this unbelievable error.

If Senator McCain wins and applies the trickle-down intervention, I see many human problems ahead because I conclude that McCain’s mind is not open. Since Senator Obama has a wide-open mind, I see many new opportunities for all humans if he wins.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and the Presidential Debates, I

The presidential debates between John McCain and Barack Obama were very helpful for me because their proposals and thoughts are as different as night and day. To McCain, government must serve the people of the USA through rich people. To Obama, government must serve the people of the USA by itself. Further, McCain’s ideas are opposed to my theological science whereas Obama’s thoughts are in harmony with theological science.

If McCain wins, the Republican party will no longer be the party of Abe Lincoln because Abe Lincoln was a builder of the Union, as the Constitution mandates in the Preamble, "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, ...."

McCain is a ‘free trader’ and believer in States Rights. If McCain wins, the States will gain rights, for instance, to make decisions on trade, abortion, health care, etc. And the national government will primarily become a Bush-style military organization. If McCain wins, the USA will make a hard turn and backwardly to the Articles of Confederation. This return will transform the Constitution into toilet paper.

Your vote is thus very important in this presidential election.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and the Failures of a Free Market Economy

A free market economy can be expected to degenerate and lead to depression because it has no goals. In order to turn this degeneration into generation, free market economists intervene into the U.S. economy two major ways.

One way is the trickle-down intervention. Also known as the supply-side intervention, the trickle-down way feeds new capital into the top 5% earners. The second way feeds new capital money into the lower 95% of earners. It is called the trickle-up intervention. Both ways increase the national debt.

In the presidential election this year, John McCain proposes the trickle-down intervention. On the other hand, Barack Obama proposes the trickle-up intervention. The National Debt Clock (click) indicates that the trickle-up interventions by Presidents Roosevelt and Clinton eliminated the new national debt whereas the trickle-down interventions by Presidents Reagan and the Bushies only increased the national debt. So, there is a sound reason why people should vote for Barack Obama this year.

However, if Obama wins, the USA would be also winning something. Obama’s win with the trickle-up intervention would be aimed at eliminating the national debt. With Obama’s win, the national government would also be able to make long-term national goals. Such goals are needed to make all U.S. citizens equal, as God does create all humans.

Asking a few U.S. rich citizens to guide the future of all citizens with a trickle-down intervention is wrong because these humans are not gods. Today, rich and poor citizens are still filled with many evils.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Developing Alternatives to a Free Market Economy

Developing an alternative to a free market economy will not be of interest to people who reject God and those religious people who do not believe in reincarnation. All alternatives to a free market economy must thus serve those people who believe in God and believe that they will live forever.

After many years of thought on these alternatives, I concluded that life after death is mediated by a reincarnation process. However, since planets die, human support and a space transportation system must be developed in order to maintain people who are living on a dying planet and must be transported eventually to a new planet. Thus, I conclude that life and reincarnation occurs on the same planet until that planet can no longer support life.

Obviously, a free market economy was never right. To develop alternative economies, it is clear that human life must be conceived very differently. Since my thoughts have not dealt with such conceptions, I will accept ideas for discussion.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and a Free Market Economy

The free market economy is the most irrational economy ever developed by free Men for themselves. Such an economy was developed for free people who would live together in a nation. Thus, when we speak of a ‘free country,’ we must remember that only the people in that country are free.

Further, if the free people of a nation also build a government, the free people are no longer absolutely free because they must give their government some of their natural rights. Accordingly, when a government has been formed of, by, and for people, the people and their economy can no longer be absolutely free. So, an absolutely free market economy is an irrational idea in the USA. It is irrational in the USA because the togetherness of free people in a nation has risen to Union, a higher level of thought in the minds its people.

A free market economy has never been more than a ‘product for sale’ to free people. Further, a free market economy is not scientific because it cannot be predicted, as U.S. depressions and bailouts reveal. For this reason, a free market economy must be sold to the public by economic professors at colleges and universities and think tanks such as the Cato Institute, which is a libertarian think tank located in Washington, D.C. Obviously, these sellers of a free market economy are either atheists or people who do not understand an infinite God.

When free people give a government rights, they give rights equally. In exchange for these rights, the government secures its people equally. So, when the founders applied the social contract of John Locke, they founded a social nation. However, this social nation cannot be equated to today’s socialistic nations such as Russia and other communistic nations. The social nation, which founded as the USA, is a nation under God.

A social nation under God is very different compared to a godless communistic nation. A social nation under God is progressive in that its people live in the present and future and do not behave today based on cause/effect events of the past. The future of a social nation under God is predictable. But it cannot be predicted scientifically. A social nation under God becomes highly predictable because it is goal-seeking. So, the economy for a social nation under God is a goal-seeking economic process.

It is time to stop viewing humans as machines that are guided by cause/effect relations. It is also time to rid the ugly economic classes that a free market economy builds.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Nicholas of Cusa

Today, the lives of people throughout the world are being guided by false sciences and false religions. To overcome these falsities, I suggest that people turn their minds to new studies and the development of new knowledge about God and the universe. I say that these studies must consider the works of Nicholas of Cusa and my development of ‘theological science.’ This new science began to develop on this website in the blog dated 6/5/08. It expands the thoughts of Nicholas of Cusa and the works of his earlier followers on God and the universe.

Had Nicholas not become a major leader in the development of the Italian Renaissance, modern sciences and modern industries would not exist today and we would still be living as people did during the Middle Ages. And had Jasper Hopkins (click) of the University of Minnesota not translated the works of Nicholas for English-speaking nations in the late 1970s, the life of people in the USA would degenerate as a result of false sciences and those religions that teach outdated scriptures about God. With the efforts of Cusa and the English-language translation, the people of many nations can now reject today’s wrong sciences and religious teachings by accepting a newly developing theological science and the single religion that emerges from this new science.

As I said in my last blog, it took me twenty-six years before I could write the book, The First Scientific Proof of God. This book reveals new ways of developing knowledge and discusses the works of Nicholas of Cusa, his precursors and followers, and many personalities beginning with Abraham and his monotheism. This book will shorten the new studies I suggested above.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Even More on Theological Science* and the Atheistic Mathematical Physicists

Before moving on to discuss some very exciting subjects, I want to discuss an important reason why our physical scientists, life sciences, and mathematics have rejected God and cannot make progress today. In other words, there is a sound reason that can explain why researchers cannot solve humans problems such as wars, poverty, cancer, crime, family, and depleting natural resources.

Most people do not know that the Middle Ages are the ages during which the Western world made ‘no cultural progress.’ Today, our historians know what ended the Middle Ages, what ended the ancient period, and what caused the beginning of the modern period and beginning of modern science. Our historians know that these ends and beginnings were caused by the 15th century work of Nicholas of Cusa.

When I learned about these ends and beginnings in 1979, I purchased the major book of Nicholas, On Learned Ignorance. This book appeared in the United States in the late 1970s, too late to stop our physical scientists and mathematicians from rejecting God. However, as a scientist, as an atheist, and 50 years old, this book explained my ignorance and my future. To recover my intelligence from my ignorance, I started a new personal research effort in 1980. Twenty-six years later, the research ended with my first book, The First Scientific Proof of God, and my first Internet blogging effort as a teacher. I decided to write my first book for the following reasons:

(1) On Learned Ignorance is a difficult book;
(2) I discovered a proof of God;
(3) Nicholas’ work had to be simplified and taught; and
(4) my research effort linked the teachings of Jesus Christ to the modern world and modern science.

I understand why our physical scientists, life sciences, and mathematicians cannot turn away from atheism immediately. I also understand why religions cannot turn away from their current teachings immediately. The human mind is not a machine that can be transformed instantly or overnight. For this reason, I continue to teach the work of Nicholas and my personal research finding and responding to comments on this website.

Once more people recognize my new science, which is developing and called ‘theological science,’ I will be satisfied and will rest my degenerating eyesight.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

More on Theological Science* and the Atheistic Mathematical Physicists

As I showed in yesterday’s blog, many mathematical physicists walked away from God in the 1970s with the Standard Method, a method that would guide the future of the field of physics. I believe that they did not knew that their turn away from God violated the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. However, the mathematical physicists did not walk away from God alone. The federal government also walked away with them because the U.S. government funded many atheistic projects related to the Standard Method. Since U.S. colleges and universities like government funds, they also walked away from God with these mathematical physicists.

Since I conclude that the Standard Method will fail, the U.S. taxpayer has paid heavily to achieve nothing for almost forty years. It is thus time for the U.S. government to investigate my conclusion, act, and correct this waste.

I conclude that the 20th century wars might have caused these 20th- century mathematicians to turn away from God. I made this conclusion after I learned that the 19th century discovery of transfinite numbers by Georg Cantor was not being applied by scientists. The discovery of Cantor was not the first discovery that man ever lost. The material of many authors has been lost, burned, or hidden with the hopes that the writings will be found later.

Theological science can show the importance of Cantor’s discovery. If God is infinite, then our reason tells us that God must be the origin of all of the finite things that exist in the universe. Further, if God and all finite things coexist, reason tells us that ‘middle things’ must exist in between the ‘finite things’ and an ‘infinite thing.’ Common sense thus tells us that a ‘transfinite number’ system must exist in between the infinity of God and the widely known ‘finite number’ system. This middle thing indicates that irreducible complexities exist and that the universe has no end.

The blogger of the Good Math, Bad Math website, Mark Chu-Carrol, did not like my suggestion to restudy the field of mathematics two years ago. My suggestion still holds.

I believe that many mathematicians, like Chu-Carrol, are serving atheism because they cannot lift their minds above the world of finite numbers. Their limited thinking is known as one-sided thinking.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science* and Atheistic Mathematical Physicists

This blog expands yesterday’s blog on the bank rescue, which was caused by mathematical physicists.

Many mathematicians are mathematical physicists because the universe is large and has many nonliving things that must support many living things. Because of the complexity of the universe, people expect science to understand life and all of those nonliving things that support life. Mathematicians and scientists satisfied these expectations when President Kennedy sold space research to the people. The mathematical physicists of that time helped to land on the moon because many of them had received educational help from the GI Bill of Rights. I was able to participate in this moon landing because I also received help from this bill.

In 1967, two significant events changed the way that new mathematical physicists think. One event was the support of atheism by the U.S. Supreme Court. This support violated the authorities of the founding documents. Another event was the adoption of the Standard Model by the field of physics. (click) This adoption occurred because physicists concluded that chemical atoms are more complex than they thought.

These two events are significant because the new mathematical physicists rejected God. Since this new group of mathematical physicists rejected God, they became atheists. However, I conclude that the 1967t ruling of the Supreme Court violates the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And I conclude that the Standard Model of the field of physics will fail.

The Standard Model will fail for the following reasons:
(1) the existence of God has been proven scientifically in 2006. (In ‘The First Scientific Proof of God.’)
(2) My 2006 scientific proof of God has never been falsified.
(3) My 2006 scientific proof also proves that atheism is a false theory.

Thus, the 1967 ruling of judges at the U.S. Supreme Court and the new mathematical physicists of the 1970s have made major errors that are harming the people of the USA. Unfortunately, these errors are being amplified today by atheists at scientific and mathematical websites. For instance, (click) and (click).

The above errors have a cause. I conclude that the U.S. school of physics has become enslaved by the mathematicians of Japan and India and by the U.S. atheistic mathematicians. The U.S. school of physicists must become independent by freeing itself from these awful internal and foreign enslaving forces.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science,* Nobel Prize Winners, and Mathematical Physicists

Today, the Associated Press reports that Nobel Prizes were given to three mathematical physicists. Mathematical physics is the field of mathematics that guided U.S. banks into failures and caused the U.S. government to rescue these banks. I discussed this governmental bailout in yesterday’s blog.

The Nobel Prize winners were Yoichino Nanbu of the University of Chicago and Makoto Kobayasin and Toshihide Maskawa of Japan. These awards are for the development of a new, but unproven, theory. This theory says that the Big Bang physical particle, which is preparing to explode, contains the opposing physical forces, matter and antimatter. The theory says that the concept ‘matter’ is like the human ego whereas ‘antimatter’ is like the human alter ego.

The Big Bang physical particle is said to explode when ‘matter’ becomes greater than ‘antimatter.’ The ego and alter ego of humans are thus explained as a physical process. So, these theorists say that life can be explained as a physical process. Thus, they reject the idea that human life is spiritual. But it is physical theories that caused our banks to fail and why our U.S. government had to bailout these banks.

However, this theory does not explain the origin of the Big Bang physical particle and its essential positive content (matter). And the theorists do not explain its negative content (antimatter) at all.

Theological science shows that the theory of God is infinitely superior to this atheistic physical theory because the atheistic theory assumes that the concept ‘finite’ has no opposing concept. While these mathematical physicists are trying to become dialecticians, they are not dialecticians at all. They don’t understand that the concept ‘finite’ cannot be defined without the concept ‘infinite.’ Since these theorists never bring the concept infinite into their finitudal theory, their theory must be rejected. This Nobel Prize can be called a gift but cannot be called an award.

Giving awards to atheists is a tragic human error because atheism can produce only false theories.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science,* Today’s Bank Bailouts, and Our Mathematical Physicists

Last Sunday, 60 Minutes revealed some important information for us on the bank bailout that has become law. However, those people who are not trained in mathematics might not have understood this TV information, So, I will explain this TV information in simple terms.

Many mathematical physicists today are atheists. Thus, they view humans as mechanical things rather than spiritual things. So, they reject God and the thingness of God. Accordingly, they argue that God does not exist because they cannot sense God’s phenomena or sense God’s thingness. The concept ‘thingness’ means that ‘object’ and ‘attributes’ exist in every thing.

Believers in God say that all things have permanence’ and ‘change.’ Things are permanence and never change. Thus, my wife, I, and my dog will always exist. Only the attributes of things change. The changing attributes are also called phenomena.

Believers accept God because they conclude that our senses cannot sense the thingness of humans or the thingness of God. However, believers conclude that ‘reason’ is man’s only tools for understanding the thingness of humans and God. Man’s understanding can be increased only by developing rational knowledge of the things we discover in the universe.

Accordingly, two different sciences divide believers and non believers. Non believers promote physical science, which rejects God and treats humans as mechanisms. On the other hand, all believers will eventually use theological science, which s being developed by me. Theological science accepts God and treats humans as Spirits.

According to ‘60 Minutes,’ mathematical physicists sold bankers the idea that our economy and all human mechanisms can be known exactly with mathematics. But if God exists, this idea must be false.

All believers in God must realize that the bank bailout was unnecessary. Unfortunately, many other government-funded human projects are also based only on physical science. One example is the whole medical care system. So, most of the people of the USA are paying more and more taxes unnecessarily as time passes. Further, I say that taxpayers should not expect any benefits from this terrible funding policy of the U.S. government. So, the U.S. government has a very deep and troublesome problem.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science * and Crime

If a person develop and practices false ideas, that person can become criminals. This is why nations must make laws against crime. Such laws distinguish right from wrong and are defined generally in the Declaration of Independence as the ‘Laws fo Nature’s God.’ Unfortunately, many criminal laws made by US legislators are arbitrary and thus do not follow the Declaration of Independence because our lawyers say that the Declaration of Independence is not part of the body of US laws. I disagree with these lawyers and conclude that our lawyers made a very big error.

Because of this error, crime in trh USA is growing rather than decreasing. This growth is causing insecurities in the life of every US citizen. Accordingly, the error of our lawyers originate in the US Supreme Court. Yet, the three branches of our government has the responsibility to secure the people of the USA.

Beginning in the 1960s, crime began to increase because some citizens were turning away from God and the Laws of Nature’s God. These citizens became known as Hippies. Instead of perfecting the Union, a drug culture developed by the Hippies. At the same time, a culture of other citizens would land on the moon. I was involved in this culture.

The drug culture caused new crimes. For instance, ‘stranger-to-stranger’ crime was new because crimes had always been among people who knew each other. This new crime is harder to solve by law enforcers. Another new crime is known as a ‘drug-related’ crime. Such a crime is committed by drug users who seek money to buy drugs. However, drug-related crime has expanded and is now beyond the ability of our State and local law enforcers. This crime is now at the world level and has caused a war in Afghanistan, the world’s biggest producer of drugs.

The culture and subcultures of a nation must be secured. When a nation loses its wholeness and only subcultures exist, that nation is degenerating, will divide and develop a civil war. This wholeness is being lost due to our laissez-faire economic system.

Other new subcultures are the ‘me-generation’ and ‘atheism.’ These new subcultures are turning the USA away from God, the Laws of Nature’s God, and the US science. By changing the US science, the USA could degenerate faster than our blind experts in Washington realize. The only solution to crime today is the theological science that I am developing.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

An Interesting Talk With the Atheist, dark childs rat

Click on my August 2007 blogs on the right. Then, scroll down to the 8/15/07 blog on ‘Crime Against US Citizens.’ In the comments, you will notice that I had a long and interesting talk with a very nice atheist, whose name is ‘dark childs rat.’ Like other atheists, dark childs rat did not understand why believers and non believers cannot coexist in the USA long without the developments of cultural problems and a civil war.

Apparently, many people become atheists because the teachings of religions cannot be proven as scientists can prove scientific theories. So, even though atheists cannot prove that God does not exist, they rationalize atheism by saying that God cannot be sensed. However, to sense God, God cannot be infinite and the origin of the universe.

Atheism is thus the origin of the Big Bang theory. This theory says that a high energy physical thing explodes and forms everything in the universe. But this theory also says that the universe dies and destroys all living things.

If widely accepted, the Big Bang theory will develop an evil culture because people lose their desire to live and do not have the desire to improve life. This is why drug, crime, sex, rich, etc. cultures are developing in the USA and why religious terrorists will try to destroy the USA.

I say that the Big Bang theory is false because only an infinite God is able to create a finite universe. With an infinite God, only godly cultures will develop. Since a universe created by God has no end, humans never die. With an infinite God, humans thus develop the desire to live and improve their life.

The USA was founded as a nation under God. It was not founded as a nation under atheism.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.

Theological Science, * Economics, and Talents

My new science, theological science, accepts scientific proofs of God’s existence. This new science also accepts the theory that God creates spiritual atoms (Spirits) and embodies them. The new science also divides all embodied Spirits into living things and non living things. Theological science reaches into the intelligent design of God and concludes that God has given humans ‘potential talents.’ Such a talent becomes actual when a person develops it. Since all human talents are self-developed, the theological science of talents is thus consistent with the concept of freedom.

Theological science is thus different from the science of evolutionists who say that all humans are born with specific talents, which have their origin in ancestors. Theological science is also different from the religious teaching--- that God creates the actual talent of every human being.

Since theological science is a new science developed by me for any nation under God, I notice that the U.S. economy has become inconsistent with the United States founding documents, my new science, and the potential talents of U.S. citizens. For instance, some people cannot afford the self-development of a desired or needed talent. Other people can afford the seif development of a talent but develop a useless talent. Further, the talent of some people is merely to know friends at high places. Furthermore, some people might not develop any useful talent for the United States because they were born in a rich family. In the USA, some people might agree to develop a very important talent that could become outdated soon. Who pays for making a new talent for these people?

When laissez-faire became the national economic policy in the USA, the U.S. government and business/industry leaders closed their eyes to God and the many ‘talent problems’ of the people of the USA. Hopefully, this blog opens their eyes.

* Theological science unifies scientific thoughts with people’s thoughts about God.