Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Monday, October 31, 2011

A Democracy Must Serve All of Its People and All of Its Infrastructures

After ten years of developing high technologies that landed us on the moon, the U.S. democracy, the military economy of WWII and these high technologies brought some progress.  Today, we see that two-thirds of the national wealth went to  10% of the households.  And that one-third of the national wealth went to 90% of the households.

To study the above results in detail, see Kennickell, Arthur B. and R. Louise Woodburn (April 1992), "Estimation of Household net Worth Using Model-based and Design-based Weights" and Kennick ell, Arthur B., Douglas A. McManus, and R. Louise Woodburn (March 1996) "Weighting Design for the 1992 Survey of Consumer Finances," Washington, D.C., Federal Reserve System.

However, the results above do not serve all people of the democracy that the founders created in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution.

From the 1970s to the Obama administration,  Nixon and the democrats tried to change the distribution of this national wealth so that the USA would maintain its democracy. But the republicans would continually reverse these changes, during the presidencies of Reagan and the Bushes, by  increasing the top wealthy class from 1% to 2 %.

The argument of the republicans says that wealthy investors are needed in order to operate a money-based, low-debt economy.  But this argument has changed the USA from a democracy to an oligarchy/plutocracy. (click)

However, this form of change from democracy to oligarchy/plutocracy by the republicans is quiet because it impacts the general development of the USA.  Republicans are quiet because investors do not invest in infrastructures such as roads, bridges, schools, parks, etc. because infrastructures do not produce profits for investors. To republicans, infrastructure are thus losses.

Today's republican candidates are focusing mostly on taxes and the limits of government.  The people of the USA are not going to accept their narrow view of the USA.  So these candidates better prepare to explain how they expect to serve all Americans and how they expect to develop infrastructures throughout the USA.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Getting Rid of All Money

Human life was focusd on money when the first leaders needed an army and farmers to secure a king or dictator. Unfortunately, this form of human life led only to slavery.

To free these slaves, the first democracy appeared in the USA. There, human life turned to farming and small businesses.  This life was good for religious people because they believed that they would go to Heaven where they woul live with God. Today, we know that this belief wis false. 

When the Preamble of the Constitution said that the Union must be perfected, many American builders responded by developing the States with a national money system.  But non-builders do not develop the States when they build something in the USA with our national money system and build it for another nation.

To throw all money away, all nations might first consider the use of a private money system.  Such a system can build anything and will never have any debts or any unemployment.  Perhaps, private money is the first step of eventually throwing all money away.  If we made the decision to build a spacecraft that will take all of us to live on another planet, I believe that money will no longer be found in any nation because humans will have found the absolute truth of love.

Saturday, October 29, 2011

The Democracy of the USA Was Changed by the U.S. Supreme Court

When the U.S. colonists decided to free themselves from England, they issued the Declaration of Independence (DOI) on July 4, 1776. The first two paragraphs of this founding document authorizes the social contract theory of John Locke.  This theory defines two social parties ---Society and Government.(click)  Today, Society is called 'private sector' and Government is called 'public sector.'  However, any good scientist will see that these two parties will work together only if they become 'functionally related.'  The other remaining words in the DOI authorize war against England.

In a 3/25/08 letter to me from Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, he says,

'While the Declaration of Independence is not considered law in the same sense that the Constitution is considered law, through the nation's history, it has been looked upon by the Supreme Court in order to frame the historical content of legal and constitutional issues. Additionally, the Constitution embodies the ideas of the Declaration of Independence by outlining our form of government and preserving the freedoms which we all hold so dear."
As seen, in Rockefeller's words, the U.S. Supreme Court is not relating Locke's Society and Government functionally.

Apparently, the early Supreme Court justices did not relate functionally Locke's Society and Government.  Because these justices did not relate Society and Government, Locke's social contract theory was never installed in the USA.  Here is the origin of all political forces that focused U.S. life on money. It is clear to me that more scientists must serve the Supreme Court.

Today's protests against Wall Street are thus appropriate. 

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Money Causes a Problem for Consciousness

Today, more and more people say that UFOs have visited our planet.  I have never seen a UFO.  But I believe in them because my theory of this world says that human life in the best of all worlds will  never end. Since life never ends, every human will actually visit other planets.

Most people do not believe in UFOs because their consciousness is not developing many sensual facts, reasons, and intuitions. But we can't blame citizens for not developing their consciousness. Instead, our political leaders and economists must be blamed for impeding the development of human consciousness.

The leaders and economists on this planet have focused human minds on money. They like money, because it grows and can create classes of humans such as poor, medium, and rich.  If this focus never changes, the end of planet earth will finally end and all humans on planet earth will suffer greatly, as Jesus said.  (See Ch. 24 of Matthew in the New Testament.)

So, money and its creation of classes cause a problem in the consciousness of every human who is reborn again. We must change our foces of life.


Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Being Reborn Again in a Godly Democracy

'Being Reborn Again' is a law that can be found in God's Intelligent Design.  In God's Intelligent Design this law governs all of the indivisible things that God creates.  These indivisibles are one and, like God, have no parts. Only the divisible things that God create have parts such as skin, bones, heart, bloodlines, etc..

Since democracy is also a law found in God's Intelligent Design, the law of 'Being Reborn Again,'  and the law of Democracy are related and thus work together to form the best of all worlds that God created. Since all laws in God's Intelligent Design produce the best of all worlds, Darwin's Evolutionary theory must be rejected by all  democracies.

In the U.S. Declaration of Independence, one learns that 'all Men are created equal.' And in the Preamble of the U.S. Constitution, one also learns that the Union must be perfected continually. So, in the democracy of the USA, the consciousness of all U.S. children must be developed properly and all children must behave lawfully as they grow.

When a child grows up, the conscious child must participate in the development of the democracy. As a participant becomes older and can no longer participate, these aged children must be 'cared for' properly until death occurs.

If a nation does not develop a democracy, as defined by God's Intelligent Design, the consciousness of its people will not develop properly. At this time, the USA is developing an economy but is not developing its democracy. This explains why the consciousness of U.S. children and workers is degenerating.

Interest: (click)

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Even More On 'Being Reborn Again'

When I joined the U.S. Department of Justice in 1971, as a 'hard scientist' on the moon landing program, I had the chance to work with 'soft scientists.' With them, two different views of the world was held. After I retired in 1994, I began to unify the thoughts of the hard and soft scientists based on the world of God and the Universe and man's life and rebirth.

Anselm's theology says that God is a perfect being. (click)  If God is perfect, the Universe that God created is the  'best of all universes.' However, if this best of all worlds has free things, the best of all worlds also has free things that are conscious (click) and are able to function as continuous developers of this best of all worlds. This best world explains why God gave all humans a life that continues after death.

In the New Testament, at Matt. 5:19, Jesus tells us that life continues at kingdoms that have different heavens. These kingdoms are planets on which humans can see signs in these heavens by looking at the evening sky after the sun goes down.  These kingdoms and heavens vary.  The kingdoms vary from least kingdoms to great kingdoms. And the signs in each heaven vary from kingdom to kingdom. Planet earth is one of these kingdoms. And the Big Dipper is one sign in the heaven of planet earth.

I conclude that the growth of consciousness determines the 'being reborn again' continuous path of all people.

Interest: (click)

Monday, October 24, 2011

Monday Morning Weekly World Interests

More On "Being Reborn Again"'

Being reborn again is a requirement of the theory of the endless world of 'God and the Universe.' This world was developed by ancient scientists such as Anaxagorax, Plato, and Jesus. Since the teachings of Jesus on this theory were interpreted by Western Christians poorly, the theory of this endless world didn't begin to develop until the 15th century.

Being reborn again is also a requirement of the theory of a world in which the universe ends. This world is accepted by those religions, which develop a theory of eschatology (click), or by religious physicists, who develop the cosmological ideas of Albert Einstein.

Those people who accept the the endless world will reject the religious theory that the universe comes to the end.  However, being reborn again in God's world is not possible scientifically because God's world is one and thus has no parts. Accordingly, only God can exist in a world that has no parts.

Being born again can occur only in a world that has parts.This 'world of parts' has parts that form things. To build this 'world of things,' God created 'indivisible things' and 'divisible things.'  The indivisible thing are immortal and the divisible things are mortal.  So indivisible things are the only things that are reborn again, again, ......

Interest: (click)

Saturday, October 22, 2011

Being Reborn Again

The world of 'God and the Universe' was born in Greece by Anaxagoras and Plato. To build this universe, potential indivisible things were created and unfolded by God. Then, God put these things together by relating them functionally to each other. These functional relations form many different divisible things. Thse things and relation form the Universe. All of thes divisible thing have a purpose in God's Intelligent Design..

Since the Universe has space and time, I conclude that the work of Gottfried Leibniz is correct. He says that space and time are purely relative.  Space is defined as the order of co-existences whereas time is defined as the order of successions. The co-existences are the divisible things that I identified above. So, the Universe that God made can be understood only by the geometry that was defined in the paper 'On the Hypotheses  Which Lie at the Foundation of Geometry' by  Bernhard Riemann.

God began to build the Universe with divisible things that are non-living. Until live-able planets were formed, divisible/living things would exist in the dark matter that surrounds the live-able planets. When a planet has made a place for living things, divisible/living things will begin to appear on that planet.

All divisible things (trees, coal, stones, mountains humans, dogs, suns, etc.) must pass on.  Since all indivisible things are immortal, they are reborn after they pass on as a functional divisible thing. So, I say that humans will be reborn on the planet on which the death occurred until that planet is absorbed by the sun. Since God does not create nations, it is likely that people will not be reborn in the same nation. The exception would be a great gift from God.

It seems that the U.S. founders knew the the 'reborn problem' because they included the statement 'all Men are created equal' in the Declaration of Independence.  Since 'being reborn' is a gift of God, all nations and all people should be equal.

Interest: Sunday: (click)

Friday, October 21, 2011

The Second Coming of Jesus Christ

The single and eternal world of 'God and the Universe,' which was identified first by  Anaxagorax and Plato, was detected by Jesus and taught. When Jesus taught this new world, he taught that each thing, including God, are 'in' each other.
Because logic gained control over the minds of the people of the Western world during the Middle Ages, the New Testament teachings of Jesus about 'God and the Universe' were interpreted poorly by  Christians and their leaders. Unfortunately, many of these misinterpretations are taught widely today.  One misinterpretation is 'the second coming of Jesus Christ.'

Since Jesus is not both a creator and creature, the second coming of Jesus Christ is a false statement. (for example)  In the world of 'God and the Universe'  all humans are reborn after death with a new and different body.  The rebirth of Jesus with a new and different body has occurred often after his murder on the Cross.

When the teachings of Jesus are studied by me, I conclude that most of the teachings of Jesus are scientific and will not be understood by non-scientists.

Interest: (click)

Thursday, October 20, 2011

More On the Subject of 'Creator and Creature'

In yesterday's blog, I showed that a finite creature, such as Jesus, cannot be or become an infinite creator.  This statement is true because a creator cannot be compared with a creature.

Thus, a human can only be an image of God and cannot see God clearly as Paul teaches at Rom. 1:20. Further, on p. 6 of  my' book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I also say say that an infinite thing is the origin of all finite things.  So, it is very clear that a finite creature, such as Jesus, is a creature and can never become a creator.

Other facts tells us that Jesus is not creator and creature.  For instance, in Ch. Two of Bk. 1 of his book 'On Learned Ignorance,' Nicholas of Cusa seeks the true meaning of the word 'maximum.'  (click)  This word can be applied only to a 'greatest thing' because we conclude immediately that a greatest thing can never change or lose its greatness.  So, we recognize immediately that a greatest thing is an 'absolute' and is absolutely minimum and absolutely maximum. A greatest thing is God and creator and can never change or lose its greatness. Thus, a greatest thing can never be a creature. Western Christians must fix this ugly error.

In this chapter, Nicholas of Cusa also noticed that two 'contracted maximums' exist.  Contracted maximums come from the greatest thing or God.  They come when things appear as many finite pluralities in the universe.  One of these two maximums is the 'universe.'  The other maximum is the 'goals of the universe.' Since the universe is eternal, both of these maximums are never attained because life never in the universe never ends.  Here we see the truth and reality of the 'mathematical infinity.'

It should bcoming clear that there is only one God and only one religion.

Interest: (click)

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Get a Job

Jesus Is Not a Creator and Creature

In yesterday's blog, I say that Western Christians became separated from the Eastern Christians and Muslims because the Eastern Christians concluded that Jesus is creator and creature. In this blog, I add more information that shows that Jesus is not creator and creature.

For instance, Jesus never told his disciples that he was creator and creature. Nor has any ancient philosopher said that a creator can also be a creature.  Then, when modern science begins to emerge in the 15th century, in Bk.I, Ch. One of his 'On Learned Ignorance,'  Nicholas of Cusa says, 'Therefore every inquiry proceeds by means of comparative relation, whether an easy or a difficult one.  Hence, the infinite, qua infinite, is unknown, for it escapes all comparative relation.' (click)

So, in the 17th century, when modern science began with Galileo's work on the pendulum, no scientist could ever compare any finite thing in the universe with a creator.  So, at 325 AD, no Christian could have said, with any truth, that Jesus is creator and creature.

Western Christians must act and correct their 325 AD error immediately.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Always Making Friends

When the Western Christians divided themselves from the Eastern Christians, they would soon become an enemy of a Christian, whose name was Nestorius (386-451).(click)  Nestorius denied the birth of Jesus by the Virgin Mary and the adoption of Jesus as God's Son.  Thus, he accepted only the full humanity of Jesus. Since Muhammad became a follower of Nestorianism, the Western Christians and Islam would become new enemies as the modern period emerged.  So, world wars are forming unless these enemies are destroyed.

I believe that the Western Christians and the Muslims can become very friendly if both religions reinterpret their scriptures and bring them into the newly developing symbolic language of the modern world so theycan come into the immediate agreements --- (1) that God and the Universe is one and eternal, (2) that this single world had no beginning and has no end, and (3) that man lives after death.

In this single world, no human will ever know that he or she lived before. No human will ever know where he or she will be reborn after death.  For this reason, God or the Son of God would never be born or reborn in order to judge humans.

The God and Universe is the best of all possible worlds that   God would create. So, making friends is always a necessary human activity.

Interest: (click)

Monday, October 17, 2011

More On God and the Universe

In my 10/15/11 blog, I show the earliest work of man on the development of 'God and the Universe'  by Anaxagoras, Plato, and Jesus. In this blog, I say that this development would describe a single and eternal world in which we will live forever.  However, after Jesus was murdered by the Jews, the continued development and identification of God and the Universe would lead to very bad  thoughts.

For instance, in 325 A.D., Christians became divided. The Eastern Christians said that Jesus is creature.  But Western Christians said that Jesus is both creator and creature. Below, science shows that the Western Christians are teaching a false  statement in many nations

Scientifically, a creator must be one and infinite. All creatures must thus be many and finite.  Thus, any finite creature can never be or become an infinite creator. Accordingly, the thoughts of Western Christians and Jews about 'creator' and 'creatures' are incorrect.

I believe that religions develop bad thoughts because they limit their thinking to scriptures and do not rationalize their thoughts.


Monday Morning Weekly World Interests

Saturday, October 15, 2011

Anaxagoras, Plato, Jesus, and Me Unite God and the Universe

Anaxagoras (500-428 B.C.) was the first philosopher of Ionia to live at Athens, Greece. (click), (click) He brought to Athens the statement, 'each thing is in each thing.' Big thinkers, like Plato (427-347 B.C.) , lived there.

When Aristotle's mind began to develop at Plato's Academy, Aristotle developed logic, which is found in Euclid's first geometry, in the Roman courts of Cicero during the Middle Ages, and in today's mechanical devices.

However, the mathematics (or geometry) of Plato and the logic of Aristotle were always unclear subjects. So, Plato wrote his Parmenides. This dialogue is a study of Aristotle's logic and the logically opposed words we call 'one' and 'many.' In Parmenides, Plato makes two conclusions as follows: (1) if there is no one, there is nothing at all and (2) if there is a one, the one is both all things and nothing.

At age 12, Jesus walks away from the discussions in the temple of the Jews. When he returns at age 30, Jesus does not uses logical thinking to teach his subjects on the life of humans. Instead, Jesus teaches the statement of Anaxagoras. For instance, at John 10:30 and 10:38, Jesus connects 'one and many' things by using the word 'in.' In fifteen centuries, the word 'in' begins to receive the functional relation of things.

On p.6 of my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' I say, 'all finite things are originated by an infinite thing.' Thus, the words 'finite' and 'infinite' are not related logically, just as the concepts, one and many, are not related logically. If all finite things are related to an infinite thing, they reveal the attributes of God and that God is one.

Interest: (click)

Friday, October 14, 2011

Today's Religious Cults Are Unknown

In any field of thought a cult is spoken of as an unorthodox thought. Thus, in the field of religion, many cults exist today because an orthodox theory of 'God and the Universe' was found in Greece by Anaxagoras in 500 B.C. This orthodox theory was  developed by Plato in his Timaeus and Parmenides dialogues. This orthodox thory was also taught by Jesus in the New Testament.

Many religious cults exist today for three major reasons: (1) Plato's dialogues were unknown until the Renaissance; (2) Western Christians viewed Jesus as a divine person; and (3) Aristotle's ugly logic was applied in the courts of Cicero throughout the Middle Ages.

In the USA, the U.S. religious cults are entering the presidential election season.  Foir instance, Rev. Robert Jeffres of the First Southern Baptist Church of Dallas is supporting Rick Perry. Jeffres is saying that Mitt  Romney and Mormonism is a cult.  Thus Jeffries is saying that his church is an orthodox religion.  Jeffres is teaching falsites.

At this time, the theory of 'God and the Universe' is being developed but is not being practiced. But, I believe that Eastern Christians will soon open an orthodox church to practice the concept of 'God and the Universe.

Interest: (click)'

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Only One Scripture is Needed to Express the Understandings of God and His Universe

In the New Testament at Chapter 1 of St John, John says, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.'  Since God is one and infinite, this Word and God must be pure.

Man cannot know a pure Word or a pure God.  So, we must recognize that we are only images of this Word and God and must understand God (1) by creating symbols; (2) by giving meanings to symbols; and (3) by making statements about God with these symbols. Instead of understanding God, religions say that their scriptures are the 'words of God.'   I cannot agree with these religions.

The Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Qur'an are being questioned more and more by believers and scientists throughout the world.  At the same time, many free nations are beginning to define and develop similar democracies. So, it is time for all religions to talk.  Since there is only one God, only a single scripture is needed to express man's new understandings of God and His Universe. As democracies  grow, such a single scripture will likely grow into a long world peace.

Interest: (click)

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Keep Logical Minds Away From Democracies

TV is telling us that Egyptian generals and military personal are murdering people of Egypt logically. Yet, these people became free so that a democracy could be developed. Since murder is not lawful in any phase of the development of a democracy, these generals and their military personnel must be charged with murder. If they are not charged, a democracy will not develop in Egypt.

I believe that the founders of the USA did a great job in defining a democracy and its laws.  But the U.S. democracy and its laws are still developing using logic. For instance, a small number of logical citizens still control the U.S laws, the U.S. money system, and future of the USA. Such controls are wrong in a democracy.

I believe that 'all freed people' must start to work together on the development of democracies so that 'the  democracy' is defined properly, in all nations under the same God.  We must come together on the development of democracies because we are not developing new knowledge of the cosmos and we are not responding to the teaching of Jesus on the darkening of the sun of our planet.

History is speaking to us. When the Middle Ages opened with the ugly logical thinking of Aristotle, man stopped the development of new knowledge. Then, in the 15th century, the Middle Ages was ended by the new knowledge of Nicholas of Cusa.  However, after man landed on the moon, the logic of Aristotle reentered and the development of new knowledge stopped again.  When will the people smell the stink of logic used by the few controllers of people?

Number of Pageviews: 79  First Ten World Pageviews: (click)

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

Some of God's Children Are Not Cared For Properly

In yesterday's blog, I discussed the indivisible and divisible things that God creates.  When God creates the indivisible things, the children of God will be found among these indivisible things.

So when humans decide to have a baby, the Father and Mother can give this baby only a body because the baby is an indivisible thing or child of God.  Thus, this baby is a Spirit that receives immediately a growing infrastructure from a Father and Mother.

The decision to have a baby requires the acceptance of two new responsibilities immediately by the Father and Mother. These two responsibilities must develop morally (1) the mind of the Spirit and develop naturally (2) the body of the Spirit.

In the USA, these two responsibilities were identified by the U.S. founders as 'the Laws of Nature and Nature's God' in the Declaration of Independence.  The laws of Nature apply to the Spirit's body whereas the Laws of Nature's God apply to the Spirit's mind.

While many of God's children are taken care of by some Fathers and Mothers. Unfortunately, some children of God are not cared for at all. When will the U.S. Congress develop laws that will care for all of God's children?

Interest: click)

Monday, October 10, 2011

Monday Morning Weekly World Interests in My Blogs

Communicating With the Dead

I received the following email words below after I posted the blog yesterday, which says, 'God Has No Heaven.'

"What is left to believe in, when our children die?  We hold the hope that we will see them again, in Heaven.  I cannot believe that God would take my sons and  not give me the hope of ever seeing them again.  It is all that keeps us going some days.  My brothers family went to a psychic and she told them things that only their son and Grandson could have known and told her.  I must have something like that to believe in or I could not go on.  Maybe Heaven isn't what we perceive it to be, but it does give us the hope that someday we will be able to contact them , no matter what form it may be.  Since it is our souls that are supposed to go to Heaven, I am sure we will see and recognize our friends and siblings.   If God has no Heaven , then where do our souls go?  My belief is that He sends us back in another body to be reborn again.  It is so complicated, and we are only aware of what we were taught in Church."
Since every created things are numbered, all created things are finite,  So when a scientist seeks the origin of finite things, a scientist can prove that the origin is 'infinite,' an attribute of God. Since finite things have parts, the scientist can prove that the origin is 'one,' which is another attribute of God.  From finite things, scientists will learn that all finite things are images of God. But we cannot place any finite thing in God's one and infinite world.

When God began to create, He creates indivisible things first. All of them can exist on a pin head and are 'in' God. Thus, if God ever wants to end the  universe that He created, only the indivisibles will return to God because they are immortal things.

When God acts to create a universe, God creates divisible things by putting each immortal indivisible thing 'in' all other indivisible things. Jesus show how indivisible things actually go 'in each other in Ch 10 of St. John.

So God creates a universe in which indivisibles never die and divisibles die naturally and are reborn. So a Father and Mother are always 'in' their children and their children are always 'in; their Father and Mother.  Since some indivisible things can perceive, a communication between children and Father and Mother become possible.  As time passes, family communications become difficult because 'world noise' exists among the indivisibles and can block these communications.

Interest: (click)

Sunday, October 09, 2011

God Has No Heaven

Today's Jews, Christians, and Muslims, view the concept 'heaven' as a place where people go after they are judged by a Lord (see Deut. 32:36, for example), die, and begin a new life with God and a Lord.

However, the concept, heaven, must be redefined after modern science emerged as a result of the 15th century work of Nicholas of Cusa. Cusa's work led to the 17th century work of Galileo and Kepler, the 18th century work of Leibniz, the 19th century work Riemann and Cantor, and 21st century work of me on the scientific proof of an active God. My work on the teaching of Jesus also requires us to redefine the heaven.

Matt. 5:19 identifies different heavens (least and great). One sees one heaven if one looks into the evening sky and sees stars that make signs such as the 'big dipper.'  Now, if you moved to another planet, you will see a second heaven because different signs will be seen in the evening sky.  So many heavens exist in the universe.

In my studies of God, I found that God had to be infinite if He wanted to create the finite universe in which we now live. Since God is infinite, God cannot live in the finite universe that he created.  So, God has no heaven although He can see all of the heavens through the perceptions He gave us.

Now, if we do not learn how to live on other planets, I suggest that you read Ch. 24 of Matthew. There, Jesus will tell you that your life will become more and more miserable as our sun darkens and sucks our planet into the sun.

When a person tells us to separate Church and State, this person has the desire to give us a miserable life.  These miserable lives are real because God gives us a new life on the same planet after every death.

Interest: (click)

Saturday, October 08, 2011

The Peace With Democracies and Religions

The natural death of religious leaders and teachers requires the development of new leaders and teachers so the worshippers get the same message.  However, in the development of democracies, more perfect changes are installed continually. Since democracies are always developing newness and religions are always deliving the same messages, democracies and religions are never harmonious.  Perhaps, this is why Thomas Jefferson spoke of a wall that must separate Church nd State.

However, Nicholas of Cusa found that man is always changing and developing newness because the maximum  knowledge belongs to God but can never be known by man. So, fixing the messages to religious people by the field of  religions is bad teaching.

In the U.S. political debates today, talk is getting too hot.  For instance, some nasty Christians are saying that some religions, such as Mormonism, are cults.  This is bad talk because the knowledge of any Christian is never maximum.

The wall made by Jefferson must be torn down completely so that different religions and different nations can share and discuss the knowledge that they have gathered.  To say that a scripture is true and completed is a lie.


Friday, October 07, 2011

The Positions of the ACLU Must Change

The American Civil Liberties Union takes positions that have become out-dated as a result of my recent finding of the true active God.  According to the  Wikipedia free encyclopedia (click),  the ACLU supports the following three positions of interest to this blog: (1) religious liberty, (2) separation of Church and State, and (3) opposes prayers, religious ceremonies, and some kinds of 'moments of silence' in public schools or schools funded with public money.

In the Preamble, the Constitution says that the  USA is a nation that forms continually a more perfect Union. The perfection of the Union, by the People and its government, is accelerating after the true active God was found.  Because of this finding about God, the Union can become known as  'a nation under one true and active God.'  So, just as the true God was found, the People and its government can now focus on finding the 'one religion' that expresses the one true God.

Since the true God was found only in 2006, the ACLU position on the 'separation of Church and State' has become out-dated and is now an unlawful position. But the true God also affects the position of ACLU's religious liberty because the true God is both absolute maximum and absolute minimum.  Thus, religious liberties must be limited by laws.  Some of these laws must be found in God's Intelligent Design and in the real experiences in the lives of humans.

Since the true God is active, some form of communications must exist between God and man. However, we still have no knowledge of this  communication.  So, the opposition of 'prayers' and 'moments of silence' cannot be a position supported by the ACLU, the People, and the government of the People.

Interest: (click)

Thursday, October 06, 2011

A Flaw --- "Separation of Church and State"

The First Amendment to the Constitution says, 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ...."  However, when he was president, in an official letter dated January 1, 1802, Thomas Jefferson said "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. "(click) Today, Jefferson's letter has changed the way most founders were thinking. In Jefferson's mechanical mind, one will finds many errors on the subject of human life.

The words  'Congress would make no law respecting an establishment of religion' and the words 'Congress would build a wall of separation between Church & State' have very different meanings. The meaning of Jefferson's words will eliminate (1) the functional relations among the People and their government and (2) the functional relations between Church and State.

In any nation that is to be perfected (like the USA), a God must exist and some human activities become necessary. Thus, in any godly nation, necessary human activities must develop so that  functional relations with God and all humans will occur. Some human liberties are thus necessary. The ACLU does not seem to understand these relations.

If a wall is made to separate Church and State, the State can no longer amplify and develop the words that the founders included in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence.  Jefferson's wall has already destroyed Locke's social contract.  His wall has also halted many necessary human activities that must function in Locke's Society and Government.

The promotion of Jefferson's letter has been a major error of our lawyers and the ACLU.  These errors must be eliminated immediately.

Interest: (click)

Wednesday, October 05, 2011

An Atheist Comes Only From Ignorance

In yesterday's blog, I show that U.S. laws do not limit the atheists from destroying the work of theists, who are unifying the fields of science and theology. This unity is necessary in any nation that is building a futuristic democracy and a spiritual People, who expect to live forever in the cosmos.

Instead of limiting atheists, theists are being limited.  For instance,  the U.S. government has limited the theists by removing prayers in public schools. Now, the atheists want to limit theists more. For instance, in the Pledge of Allegiance, the atheists want government to remove the words 'one nation under God.' In money, the atheists want government to remove the words 'In God We Trust.' And, the atheists want historical facts of man, like the Ten Commandments, to be removed from parks and government buildings.

The limiting of the theists by the atheists and government must be reversed because the atheists will never prove that God does not exist. It is not possible for man's mind to sense a thing that does not exist. Yet, man's mind can sense all things that exist. When I found that every finite thing  is originated in an infinite thing, I found all things that exist.

It is clear that a person is not born as an atheist. Thus, an atheist can come only from ignorance.An atheist can thus find God only with knowledge.

Interest: (clink)

Tuesday, October 04, 2011

Monthly Interest

Inconsistent Thoughts of Atheists

All rude arguments we find among humans today come from inconsistencies in thought.  For instance, in families, we find that all rude arguments among  husbands and wives or children and parents come from inconsistencies in mental thought.

After I self-published my book on 'The First Scientific Proof of God,' the atheists of the USA began to destroy it. They purchased the book from and quickly submitted five book reviews. However, they didn't read the book because they were not scientists and could not read a scientific book.  So, their arguments about my book were inconsistent. Eventually, my book was read by a qualified person, Dr. Stephen Smith of  the University of California.

In any free nation today, all arguments between a believer and an atheist will always produce inconsistent thoughts of the atheist. The atheist is always wrong because 'free things,' which they talk about, will not be found in a godless or godly world.

All good arguments can depend only on consistent thinking.

Interest: (click)

Monday, October 03, 2011

The Fall of the ScienceBloges and the Good Math, Bad Math Websites

On 11/5/07, Mark Chu-Carroll, a scientist who works for Google, posted some words about my thoughts, about Georg Cantor, and their opinions of my behavior. (click)  I saw these words for the first time yesterday, even though it was posted over a year after "The First Scientific Proof of God" was published by me and the atheists were attacking it.  I bring these words to the attention of my current readers because they shows how scientists and atheists want to destroy all scientific proofs of God and stop the development of new number systems, such as (1) the infinitesimals of Riemann's geometry and (2) Cantor's transfinite numbers.

The Good Math, Bad Math website (click) is operated by Chu-Carroll.  This website is  connected to the major atheistic website, ScienceBlogs. (click)    If Chu-Carroll had known that the speed of the neutrino is greater than the speed of light, he would have looked deeper into the work of Riemann and Cantor before posting these words.  I expect these websited to fall.

I never had to wait for CERN's recent finding because my scientific proof of God says that all finite things can come only from an infinite God. Thus, the photon could not exist if it did not have an infinite number of infinitesimal parts.

It is not clear whether Chu-Carroll read Cantor. If he did, he would see in Cantor's '1883 Grundlagen' paper that two infinities exist.  One is determined and belongs to God.  The other is undetermined and belongs to all finite things. These two infinities will give success to people.

Interest: (click)

Monday Morning Weekly World Interests in My Blogs

Sunday, October 02, 2011

My Definition of Matter

Some people do not have the book on A Source Book in Mathematics' by David Eugene Smith.  So, in this blog I present the important footnote found on page 425 of Smith's book on Bernhard Riemann's famous mathematical paper 'On The Hypotheses Which Lie At The Foundations Of Geometry.'  Smith was authorized to bring this footnote from Bertrand Russell, The Analysis of Matter, p.. 21,  New York,  Harcourt, Brace and Company.(click)  Russell's footnote says:

"Riemann who was logically the immediate predecessor of Einstein, brought in a new idea of which the importance was not perceived for half a century. He considered the geometry ought to start from the infinitesinal, and depend upon integration about finite lengths, areas, or volumes. This requires, inter alia, the replacement of the straiught line by the geodesic: the latter has a definition depending upon infinitesimal distances, while the former has not. Riemann's view was that a straight line does not differ from a curve in this respect. Moreover, measurement being formed by means of bodies, a physical operation, and its results depend for their interpretation upon the laws of physics. The point of view has turned to be of very great importance. Its scope  has been extended by the theory of relativity, but in essence is to be found in Riemann's dissertation."
I say that 'matter' originates from the Intelligent Design of an infinite active God.  This matter is 'all indivisible things.'  They differ and are immortal. The Inteligent Design tells us that each indivisible thing is 'functionally related' to all other indivisible things.  These functional relations form all divisible things, which are different and are mortal. I say that my definition of 'matter' is the true matter. The indivisibles form dark matter. And divisibles form light matter.

Interet: (click)

Saturday, October 01, 2011

Introducing New Things and Their Waves

CERN's finding of particle speeds greater that the speed of light tell us that the Big Bang theory has wasted many years of bad scientific research and also wasted many years of developing wrong democracies wold wide.

Because of this waste, it is now time to consider an active infinite God and His finite Universe.  This  God made a universe that has an infinite number of finite things that are in motion and has waves. This single world of God and His Universe had no beginning.

Since the universe is not what our physicists have said, it is also time now to consider the work of Donald Hatch Andrews on the waves of things.  In 1966, he said, in the Preface of his book on 'The Symphony of Life (click),' that the universe is composed not of matter but of music. At Johns Hopkins University as a chemist, he taught and studied the things and their waves throughout Baltimore. Andrew's book is for both professionals and laymen.

In 1966, Andrews expected the unity of science and religion. But this unity didn't happen because everything good seemed to stop in the USA after JFK was assassinated, after astronauts landed on the moon, after Nixon left the White House and  after the Big Bang theory was sold to the U.S. Congress and its atheists.

Interest: (click)