Scientific Proof of God, A New and Modern Bible, and Coexisting Relations of God and the Universe

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

53. Leibniz: On Life and Death

In my two books, 'The First Scientific of Proof of God' (click) and 'A New and Modern Holy Bible'(click) , I discuss Gottfried Leibniz's work. His work is found in G.H.R. Parkinson's book on the Philosophical Writings of  Leibniz.  I conclude that a copy of Parkinson's book should be placed in the home of every nation with the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament.

The life and death of humans are very different than religions, teachers, and parents say. Leibniz teaches life and death beginning at Paragraph 70 of his Monadology. Human life occurs after the lower body parts have been formed naturally and sequentially and is ready to receive a human indivisible or soul.  And human death occurs when the human indivisible or soul has left the body and the body parts begin to decay in a natural sequence. So, abortion is unlawful only after a new child is born.  Since only God knows the human indivisibles or souls, we will never know who was born when a child was born.  Raising children is thus an important act in every nation.

The process of life and death tells me that the economies of every nation in the world is ungodly because they do not treat 'children' properly. For instance, why can some children go to higher schools of education when other children cannot go to these schools.

God can influence us and all other indivisibles. Since the influences of us by eternal actions are infinite in number, we have problems in separating God acts and the acts of other created things. So, we must learn how to focus and clarify our perceptions.  Did God turn Sandy's hurricane west in the USA for the first time recently?  No one will ever prove or know the answer to this question.

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

52. The First True Atoms Are Human Minds

In Leibniz's Monadology, we learn that no true atoms are identical because they do not differ in quantity. So every true atom is qualitatively different than all other true atoms.

Some created true atoms are human minds that can measure all divisible things that God makes with the true atoms.  So, our minds are must be the first true atom of the infinite number of true atoms that God creates all at once. On the human mind, Leibniz says that we are obliged to confess that perception and that which depends on it cannot be explained mechanically.  Accordingly, when physical scientists and atheists say that our minds are mechanical things, they are wrong.

When I worked at the U.S. Department of Justice, I concluded that flawed symbolic languages can produce criminals. But when the Republicans took power of the U.S. government, I learned that they always say that criminals are born criminals; that criminals should be caught; that criminals should put them in jail; and that the keys should be throw  away. Obviously, the Republicans do not know how the human mind works at all.

Although I joined the U.S. government under President Nixon, I eventually became an independent voter and will not vote for the Republican party again because it is focused only on economics and is not focused on people, the lives of people, and the infrastructure of people. Only if all political persons throw their mental mechines away, the USA could become godly. 

Monday, October 29, 2012

51. The True Atoms

The physical scientists and atheists are selling physical atoms and have never found any. They are also selling the Big Bang theory, which can never be proven. When will these scientists and atheists, and their political followers, back out of these empty holes of the field of physical science?

But atoms do exist because God made them. In his paper on 'Monadology,'  Gottfried Leibniz shows how God creates atoms, which ares the indivisibles of God.  Leibniz has called God's indivisibles  monads or true atoms.  He views indivisibles as simple substances because they have no parts, have no extensions, have no shape, and have no divisibility.   Iindivisibles, monads, or true atoms are true atoms of nature and form all relations of 'things.'

Physical scientists say that physical atoms exist. I don;t know where they will be found because hydrogen and all other chemical atoms have parts, With parts, hydrogen has protons, electrons, etc. and cannot be atoms. Since Leibniz's true atoms have no parts, his true atoms cannot be made with compounds, like chemical atoms can produce compounds, such as water (H2O) or salt (Na Cl). Thus, compounds cannot make true atoms because a true atom must end immediately when it begins.

Leibniz says that we cannot explain how the true atoms can be altered or changed because they have no no windows by which anything could come in or go out.  However,  the true atoms can have qualities, otherwise they would not be beings, such as a person, chicken, or sun.  So, all true atoms are different. They are different because an identity has never been found in the universe. So change exists is every true atom.

Since change will be found in every true atom, an internal principle will be found in every true atom because external causes will influence the true atoms. The external causes are also different, otherwise the true atoms would not change.  Leibniz says that the changes inside true atoms will come from something outside.  The outside stuff is called a perception, which is distinguished from consciousness.  The passage from one perception to another perception is called appetition by Leibniz.  SO, perceiving true atoms are souls that can experience a plurality of perceptions at all times. Non-perceiving true atoms exist and are the physical atoms that physical scientists are seeking. All true atoms (or indivisibles) are made by God. Thus, God and all divisibles in the universe are  influencing every true atom.

In my first two books, I inform the readers about Leibniz's true atoms. In my first book,'The First Scientific Proof of God.' I also discuss the interaction between God and man. I conclude that our influences from God, after our death, are very clear. But I conclude that God's influences become less clear when we are alive because the USA has lost God.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Presidential Debates

The presidential debates are over. The expressions of Obama and Romney are now focusing their thoughts on voting.

Obama is trying to turn the USA away from wars and their high moral costs, turning our thoughts to families and the education of our children, turning our thoughts on smaller and new businesses, and turning our thoughts on the many people of the USA.

On the other hand, Romney is trying to turn our thoughts onto the money system, the economic system of  old U.S. economies and the economy of middle class people.

After learning the that Romney came out of Harvard University of Management Business Administration and law, I do not believe that he has any ability to guide a nation under God because Mormonism is wrong.  And the world economic market is too wild to build our new children under God and smaller businesses. Big corporations and banks are Romney's interests.

Saturday, October 27, 2012

50. Mind-Body Relations

For many years, atheists, scientists and  chairpersons of the school of physical science in colleges and universities, have gone too far in their minds without finding any new and important truths.  Aside from saying that God does not exist, these persons also say that our mind and body form one thing, a machine.  So they say that humans, dogs, birds, etc. are nothing other than machines. These persons also say that humans have only one life because the universe is coming to an end.

The atheists, scientists and chairpersons reject indivisibles, divisibles, and mind-body relations.  They reject these powerful concepts even though Galileo's  book, 'Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences,'  says, in the First Day, that a body is built up of an infinite number of indivisibles. With their godless thoughts, the atheists, scientists, and chairpersons are destroying the USA.  Their ignorant words about God and the universe are misleading the U.S. Congress.  Their words are also turning the current debates between President Obama and Mitt Romney away from God, the future of the USA and the future of this planet.

In yesterday's blog, I show that God created a universe.  In it,  we will live forever. The life that God gave us will be found only in an open mind.  This life from God will not be found in a machine. Since we are Little Gods, we can always improve the universe that God gave us because a perfect or completed  thing will be found only in God.

When different thing are made by God, they come together.  An example is the mind-body relation, When they come together, they will become known as a function relationship. (learn some function relations)  This is how God is making the universe.

Friday, October 26, 2012

49.Abortions Are Lawful

As a 'scientist in engineering' from Johns Hopkins University, I learned how to think differently compared to many scientists and engineers. I think differently because I developed my mind with the most powerful symbols that humans will find..  With these powerful symbols, I was able to prove God's existence in the first book I wrote. With these powerful symbols, I also found the immortal indivisibles that God created. With these indivisibles, God can make a universe that has no end.

Unfortunately, many scientists and engineers reject God and become atheists. With logical thinking,  American atheists use logical symbols but do not use dialectal symbols. Thus, atheists are unable to open their minds to metaphysical thoughts and coexisting opposites.  If they could open their minds, they would learn about God's indivisibles and learn that we cannot complete the knowledge of God's universe.

Let me show you why atheists are lost. Ask an atheist to divide a yardstick in half. When it is divided, then, ask the atheist to divide the two sticks in half. Then, ask the atheist to divide the four sticks in half. Then, ask the atheist to continue this division, which is called 'infinite divisibility.'  Now, ask the atheist, 'When will you complete this division?' The atheist must say that an infinite division has no end. Yet they say that the universe will come to the end. So, atheists are lost.

Now, ask the following question to a married man and women, an unmarried man and woman, and a raped woman: 'When will an indivisible person  become a new member of your family.' Two answers can be given as follows: (1) when the indivisible person is conceived;  (2) when the indivisible person becomes related to the body, that is, either at birth or at early or later development of the body in the womb. The U.S. Congress cannot answer this question because it does not consider God's work.

I conclude that an indivisible person will become a member of a family at birth. Thus, an indivisible person and its body are related functionally.  So, we can speak of a person or body as a mind-body thing, a spirit-body thing, or an indivisible person-body thing.  My conclusion says that abortions are lawful for a women because a man and woman can make a new body but cannot make a mind, spirit, or indivisible person.  Only God can make our mind, our spirit, or us. The relation between a person and his or her body tells us the space and time of the universe.  Relations form 'space' whereas 'time' forms orderly successions.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

48. Our Perfectible Universe Is Becoming Like God.

In Chapter 1 of my new book, 'A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design of An Active God,' I prove scientifically that God exists, that God is one and infinite, and that God was not caused by anything. So, if we look at the evening sky and see many little stars, our minds can prove that God created a universe and everything we can see. We can prove other truths about God. For example, if God is one, we can expand our thoughts and say that God is indivisible.  Then, we can also say that God is also a 'whole' who has no parts. Since God is one and has no parts, we can say that God is the greatest and perfect thing we will ever find.

If God is a whole without parts, we can say that God created a universe of different things. Thus, no two identical things will be found in the universe because each different thing has an infinite number of different parts.

With these simple truths, we can say that God created an infinite number of immortal indivisible things first. Since we can't see these immortal indivisible things, they can be called dark matter.  Secondly, we are able to say that God connected all of these indivisible things together. These connections form mortal divisible things that we can see. These mortal divisible things form a changing universe that continues to become more and more perfect. So, we can see precisely that our perfectible universe is becoming more and more like Go, even though we can't become exactly identical to God.

Today, the USA and many other nations are lost because God is unknown. Yet,  God can be understood if nations build their minds and look deeper into the indivisibles and divisibles.

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

47r. GOP Thinks and Acts Without God

After Abe Lincoln was assassinated by foreign agents from Europe, the American System of Economics was trashed(click) and the British System of Economics, that is, free enterprise, was installed (click). Many free enterprise rs focus their businesses on a free world market.  When they must hold their prices down, they are still able to send their children to private schools and higher schools of education.  The children of their workers must send their children to public schools  and cannot afford to send them to colleges.  But the prices of  enterprise rs are unable to pay for infrastructures such as flood control, highways, bridges, etc. So, free enterprise can cause major economic problems in any any nation.

I conclude that the GOP will not work with President Obama, even if Obama is returned to the White House. I make this conclusion because the GOP will not help Obama to increase the taxes of the rich classes, in order to send poor children to schools of higher education.  I also conclude that the GOP will not approve any infrastructure for the USA.  Even, if Romney wins the White House, the new problems that I see in the USA will not be solved by Romney or GOP.

I see a problem with the world market; a problem with the money systems; a problem with mineral ownerships; a problem with competition;a. problem with the decay of of U.S. science and technology; a problem with national languages and their symbols; and a problem with theories of God and creator and the teachings of religions and scriptures.

My research says that bloodlines do not exist.  This means that Darwin's evolution, DNA identities, and Jesus' bloodline are false. Thus, when a couple is having sex and want a child, they must learn that they are making children in response to God's act of giving a child a new life. Accordingly, I say that the inheritances in the USA have caused the U.S. economy to become dysfunctional.  So, I ask this question,  'Does Mitt Romney view the White House mostly as a place to enrich his children?" I ask this question because I know that the Mormon teachings about Jesus are false.

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

47q. The Final Debate Between Presidenl Obama and Mitt Romney

The final debate last evening between President Obama and Mitt Romney on the subject of diplomacy gave listeners the clear differences of these two men. So, let me tell you my view of their differences.

It is clear that the Commission did not require these two men to debate the theory of God and creator. So, the U.S. government is not required to secure the 'one People' of the USA for the God, which is defined in the Declaration of Independence (DOI). Nor did the Commission require these two men to debate the practices of religions in the USA. So, the U.S. government is also not required to secure the 'one People' of the USA for the creator, which is defined by the DOI.

So, the debates of Mitt Romney were centered primarily on economics and world markets: (1) on developing large and small corporations; (2) on promoting Wall Street investments; (3) on making the United States the leading world trade nation; (4) on developing small businesses; and (5) on developing the military industrial complex to protect world trade.

Accordingly, the debates of President Obama were also centered, but primarily on economics and national U.S. markets: (1) on building the United States as 'one People'; (2) on building children morally and building strong families; (3) on recovering the fields of science and mathematics; (4) on luring foreign companies to return to the USA; and (5) on building new infrastructures throughout the USA.

If the Commission had required debates on God, creator, and religions, I believe that the thoughts of Romney would be very different and like the thoughts of Obama because my work on God, creator, and religions are very similar to the thoughts of Obama.

The presidential voting will have a result. If Romney wins, the future of the 'one People' becomes unclear.  But if Obama wins, the future of the 'one People' still remains clear.

Monday, October 22, 2012

47p. The 2012 Presidencial Debates are Criminal.

The last presidential debate of 2012 will be held tonight. This debate will be about the diplomacy of the presidency. But the most important subjects of the USA will not occur before the presidential voting takes place. . 

Important subjects of the President of the USA are found in the Declaration of Independence (DOI).  The two most important subjects in the DOI are the symbols: God and creator. The meanings of these two symbols are theories to the field of science.  Thus, the three branches of the U.S. government should be seeking the true meaning of these two symbols because the Constitution requires the U.S. government to 'form a more perfect Union.'

I conclude that God and creator have never been debated because the Constitution says: Congress cannot make no law respecting an establishment of religion.  But the symbol 'religion' must be distinguished from God and creator because religions are practices of a specific G od and a specific creator. Only science practices a proven God and a proven creator.  Religions are thus practices of God and creator, just like medical theories are practices of doctors.

So, I say that presidential debates about God, creator, and other statements in the DOI must be debated before November 6, 2012. Otherwise, these debates are criminal.

When I discussed the difference between theories and practices to President Brody of Johns Hopkins University (JHU), he agreed with me.  He agreed because I had told him that  JHU does not need to advertise the symbol  'nonsectarian' in order to lure students  Any college or universe can teach any theory of God or any theory of creator without fearing the practices of any religion.

As seen, every nation must recognize that their national languages are filled with many weak and wrong symbols.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

47o. Building a Nation of 'One People' As a System

When I was employed by Lockheed Martin in the 1950s, I drew a small box, with a very sharp pencil, in which an electronic thing would be added to the right place in an airplane.  I drew this box on a standard flat metal sheet, which was used in aircraft industry. When I finished it, it was taken to the production floor where many electronic things would be added to the boxes. Then the electronic boxes would be added to a new airplane.  These new airplanes, which were launched from the back of trucks, would be sent to Europe to protect NATO and the USA against the Soviet Union.

In my next assignment, I decided to use drafting sheet of paper rather than a sheet of metal.  With this paper, one could see all of the electronic boxes that were to be placed in these truck-launched trucks.This paper sheet was a new drafting process because it shows 'a whole that has parts.' Quickly, the people of Lockheed Martin liked my new drafting.

With my new drafting process, I developed something that is called as a 'system' today. My new drafting process caused me to be reassigned to an advanced project that would challenge the Sputnik spacecraft of the Soviet Union.  With my new drafting process, I had to draw all of the electronic boxes that would be put into a new American rocket.  This rocket and its different boxes would go high into the sky,  to 57 miles. In the first launch the rocket osculated and had to be turned downward into the ocean. After the oscillation was fixed, we lifted the chimpanzee, Max, into space.  Max did return happily.

My system of wholes with parts would follow me forever.  The government detected the 'wholes with parts; in the Air Force and the 'wholes with parts' in the Navy's ships. In the Department of Defence,  Robert McNamara made the Department of Defense to make 'wholes with parts' by using cost and effective parts.

I believe that we can make the USA into a 'whole that has necessary and happy parts. I also believe tht all parts of any nation can make every human 'equal'

Friday, October 19, 2012

47n. What is Meant by the Statement, 'One People' ?

As I said earlier about lawyers and their poor interpretations of the scientific statements of the Declaration of Independence (DOI), some of the founders of the USA were scientific. Ben Franklin was thus a scientist like Jesus.  Ben visited  scientific societies in Europe just like Jesus visited scientists in Greece. So, after the DOI was drafted by Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and John Adams had to make changes to it.

A major change was made by them in the very first sentence when they changed the word 'people' to the scientific statement --- 'one People. The meaning of this first statement can be connected to the second statement --- 'all Men are created equal'--- in the second paragraph.

But the second statement does not mean that 'all Men are created as identical persons.' The second statement is scientific and is dealing with a whole and its parts. So the second statement means that 'all Men are created as parts of one People.' This new and more scientific statement says that we can build nations of parts, just like God built the universe with its parts.

Thus, to build a nation of human parts, only necessary parts are used. Each human is equal because each human is a necessary part of the nation and each human wants to be that necessary part. Incidentally , President Reagan was acting similarly to build a new nation. Initially, he was seeking 'reasoned' (or necessary) products from manufactures.

To understand th world that God made, learn how to think the way I think and teach the DOI. The atheists can not understand this world at all.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

A Foreign Person Does Not Understand the Philosophy of Socialism.

On CNN, a foreign busuness man has been telling Americans that social systems do not work.  This foreign man is writing in support of Republicans against President Obama.

This man, and many Americans, do not understand that many different social systems exist. One system is the communism of Russia. Another is the social contract of John Locke, which is found in the USA in the Declaration if Independence. When are humans going to understand the different meanings of the symbo, socialism?

The Mind of Romney and the Mind of Obama

In Chapter 1 of my new book, 'A New and Modern Holy Bible and the Intelligent Design of An Active God,' I present the history of man's mind and its development of knowledge. In the Introduction of this book, I say that we are 'little Gods,' whose lives never end.(click) Since our lives come to an end but are given new lives by God,  it is important for Americans to know clearly the minds of Obama and Romney.

Before I retired from the U.S. Department of Justice, I concluded that our minds are formed by 'symbols.'  I found that incorrect symbols can lead to false scientific statements and that good symbols can lead to precise scientific statements. Symbol also affect social relations. So, a boy's mind in a ghetto must learn to 'duck' when daddy comes home as a drunk and swings at the boy.  But a boy's mind in a suburb will learn the true meaning of a 'duck' that lives on ponds. When I studied Jesus, he said that all of our evils come from the symbols within us. (See Mark 7:23)

I conclude that the mind of Obama is concentrated on the equality of people and their future.  This  concentration is necessary for all future presidents because human lives never end.  The mind of Romney is concentrated on ways that the U.S. economy can be fixed.

As a learned scientist and a student of theology, I say that Romney's mind is a materialistic mind filled with many old symbols. His concentration on business management limited his thoughts to 'size of government.'  On the other hand, Obama's mind is a metaphysical mind that is reaching into God's infinity with many new symbols for government.  The disconnection of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution has limited the actions and thoughts of Romney and Obama

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

Oct. 16, 2012 Debate Between President Obama and Mitt Romney.

Last evening, the debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney identified their real leaderships of the USA. To Romney, the USA will not change the nation.  But to Obama, the USA will change the nation in order to produce progress for all citizens.

Based on my blog yesterday on the British and American economics, last evening I concluded that Obama and Romney are also different. To Romney, the USA will remain as a trading nation with a world market. Romney will thus maintain the British System of Economics. But to Obama, the USA will become a more perfect Union of equal People. Thus, Obama will destroy the British System of Economics and will install the American System of Economics.

The American System of Economics became very technical in the 1872 book on 'The Unity of Law' by Henry C. Carey.  Carey was an advisor of President Lincoln. The American System of Economics began in Germany with studies on political economy and social science by Professor Eugene Duhring at Berlin University.

The American System was put to work for all U.S. citizens in the coal mountains of Pennsylvania in the early 1800s by Frederic List of Germany.  I was born in the town of Pine Grove in this area. The history of List and this coal country is found in the newspapers of Reading, PA. However, the the British System slowly took full control of the USA. Thus, when oil was found, the British System economists turned their eyes away from the people of the coal country and left them jobless. The Appalachian mountains have not recovered yet.  This is the way that the British System treats American workers.

The British System is an ungodly economy.  This is why I will vote for President Obama in November.

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

47m.The Disconnections of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and the Influences of Great Britain

Great Britain was unsuccessful to return the United States to the control of England.  However, I came to the conclusion that Great Britain did influence the separation of the Declaration of Independence (DOI)and the Constitution.  For instance, yesterday I say that the 1859 book on Darwin's evolutionary theory did not stop President Lincoln's civil war. But it gained the belief of some Americans --- the atheists and materialists.

But Great Britain separated the DOI and the Constitution in another way when American economists installed the British System of Economics rather than the American System of Economics.(click)  The British and American systems are very different.

In the DOI, the British System of Economics destroys the Society and Government of John Locke's social contract. The USA was thus changed from a nation of  'one People' to a 'trading nation.'  As a trading nation, Americans are expected to sells and buys things in a free world market. This system was developed by Adam Smith (click) But Smith feared that people will only become shopkeepers.

In the DOI, the American System of Economics maintains Locke's social contract and the DOI. The American System was presented to Congress by Henry Clay (click) It was developed by Henry C. Carey in his book, 'The Unity of Law.' (click)

In Chapter 1 of Carey's book, one finds that the symbols of the British System --- Value, Wealth, Labor, Capital, Rent, Wage, Profits, etc. are lacking definitions. Yet in Chapter XIV of Carey's, all symbols of the American System are defined. Thus, I conclude that the British System is not scientific. Accordingly, the USA economy must become scientific.

Adam Smith's fear about the British System was a reality because the USA lost its ranking in science and mathematics with the British System.  Thus, President Obama is correct to increase the tax of the rich class so that U.S. science and mathematics will grow naturally. The USA must move forward as 'one People" so that world markets will fade away.

Monday, October 15, 2012

47l. The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution Are Unified

The Declaration of Independence and the Second Constitutional Congress became a 'whole' on July 4, 1776. This whole became known as Locke's Society and Government. Then, in 1787, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution became a 'new whole.'  This new whole was maintained through the presidency of Abe Lincoln.  But after Lincoln was assassinated, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were divided and the Society and Government of the USA was destroyed.

This division and destruction was caused initially  by England's desire to recover the USA.  First, England tried to recovery the USA with the War of 1812. England lost. Next,  Darwin's  evolutionary theory was brought to the USA. This theory is expected to maintain the bloodline of corporations,  dictators, and oligarchies.  This book came to the USA in 1859.  Some Americans would try to keep Lincoln out of the White House. But they failed and killed him.

A major idea came out of Darwin's theory by Herbert Spencer. Spencer's idea is called the 'survival of the fittest.' (click) This idea means 'crushes people who are not fitted'. This ignorant idea is coming from a logical mind (or logician), physical scientists, atheists, and lawyers, who believe that humans are mechanical or materialistic. If these ignorant humans grow in number, the USA will become a disaster.

Today, many Americans are use many poor symbols and their meanings. Some of these poor thinkers are atheists, physical scientists, logicians, lawyers, and economics.  These Americans are changing the unification of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.  Mitt Romney seems to be in the economic group that would crush certain humans .

Sunday, October 14, 2012

47k. More On the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Lawyers.

When the U.S. lawyers misinterpreted the Declaration of Independence, (DOI) they changed the United States of America greatly. Since I have not developed any respect for the field of lawyers, let me tell you why.

When humans began to write in 5000 B.C.,  humans began to develop their minds with symbols. At this beginning, every symbol in the human mind had to be given its meaning. Today, U.S. lawyers do not follow this historical human behavior when they interpret the DOI and other documents. When they interpret things, their minds become like the minds of criminals that act immorally and must be corrected in a prison. .

When U.S. lawyers interpret the DOI, they act immorally because the DOI loses the following symbols and their statements:

(1) Oneness and equality of 'one People.'
(2) Nature's God.
(3) Laws of Nature.
(4) Self-evident Truths:
     (a) all Men are created equal.
     (b) certain unalienable Rights that among them are Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.

Then, when U.S. lawyers interpret Locke's book on The Second Treatise of Government, the DOI also loses the functional relations between our nation's Society and Government because the U.S. lawyers do not distinguish them.
I conclude that the immorality of the U.S. lawyers is very great and well beyond the DOI. 

Saturday, October 13, 2012

47j.Digging the Truths Out of the Declaration of Independence

In the blogs from 47a to 47i, I presented evidence that the United States of America is no longer the nation that our founders made, with the 'Declaration of Independence, which is identified as Locke's Society,' and with the 'Constitution,' which is identified as Locke's Government.  (Note. The Society and Government is defined in Lock's book on 'The Second Treatise of Government.') In this blog, I show why the United States of America is no longer the nation that our founders made. I also show how we can dig the truths out of the Declaration of Independence.

Out founding nation no longer exists because our. lawyers do not know how to identify the truths in the Declaration of Independence (DOI). They conclude wrongly that the DOI has only one authority --- to go to war against England. I conclude that lawyers have misinterpreted the DOI by saying that the words of first paragraph and part of the words of the second paragraph do not identify an authority of laws..

I conclude that our lawyers are unable to interpret the Declaration of Independence correctly because they are unaware of the correct 20th century scientific statement, 'sensual data are primarily symbolic.'  (See Philosophy in a New Key by Suzanne Langer)  So, in the DOI, the symbols in the first paragraph and symbols in the second paragraph are scientific terms and can be interpreted correctly only by trained scientists like me. 

In my new book, 'A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design of An Active God'  (click) ,  I discuss the early history of the development of symbols, which appear in 5000 B.C. when humans began to write. In my book, I also show that the history of symbols is very important because all humans minds are developed primarily with symbols. Accordingly, the teachings of symbols must occur early in the life of all children.

In the presidential debates this year, the Republicans are showing that they do not understand the symbols in the DOI.

Friday, October 12, 2012

47i.Making International Laws With Science and God

The essays on 'understanding' by John Locke and Gottfried Leibniz, which I discussed in yesterday's blog, work together in identifying all new or improved Laws of Nature and of Nature's God.  These laws emerge from the U.S. Declaration of Independence and are finalized in the Constitution.

Thus, in the USA, all new and improved laws must be written with symbols by the U.S. Congress. Since the three branches of the U.S. government are functionally related, all new and improved written laws must also be measured by the President and the U.S. Supreme Court. These symbolic and measured laws will eliminate and reduce the  'negatives' of political thinking today and will build the dynamic and changing fields of science and religion

Since all laws under God must be made this way, atheism (click), Project Reason (click) and evolutionary theory (click) must be removed from the public schools, colleges, and universities of  the USA. And lobbyism must be changed (click) so that lobbyists are guided by the dynamic nature of the fields of science and religion. I believe that the U.S. Congress must also be changed so that science and religion are understood by every representative that serves the People.

Making international law is a tough job because our minds can only view a world that was made by God with symbols. To view and talk about God's world, our minds must use the symbols (or words) of a national language.  Since many different national languages exist today, God's world seems to be different for every human being. But the problem of symbols can be solved if all nations accept 'the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God' and make their best laws.
So, it is possible that peace might be just around the corner.

Thursday, October 11, 2012

47h. Understanding the Law of Nature and of Nature's God.

When John Locke wrote 'The Second Treatise of Government' in 1690, a year earlier he wrote 'The Essay Concerning Human Understanding.'(click)  Locke's essay is saying that God does not sit back and watch us. Instead, God is active in our life. But this active God is not Jesus. My new book on 'A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design of An Active God.'(click)

In 1722, Ben Franklin read Locke's essay. This is why Ben and our founders made the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. In 1694,  Gottfried Leibniz read Locke's essay and sent  comments to Locke. (Remnant & Bennett ) Then, in 1704, Leibniz prepared for a debate with Isaac Newton and Locke. Since Newton feared Leibniz and Locke died in 1704,  Leibniz's debate would be limited to correspondences with Samuel Clarke in 1715-16.(click)

The essays of Locke and Leibniz are addressing the concept called 'understanding.' This concept means that God is unknown to us. But we can understand God because an absolute God must creates a 'best' universe and must be active in our best world.

Remnant & Bennett tell us that the essay of Locke and the essay of Leibniz are working together.  Locke's understandings are based on 'common sense' whereas Leibniz's understandings are based on 'sufficient reason.' So, the Laws of Nature and of God's Nature, which are found the Declaration of Independence, must be found by the U.S. Congress so that we can learn about an active God.

Since the Mormon church teaches that Jesus is God, Mitt Romney, who was a Bishop of the Mormon church, should not become the President of the USA.  President Obama is on the right track of building a godly nation.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

47g. The Failure of the Declaration of Independence.

When our founders made the Declaration of Independence (DOI), they included social contract laws in the first two paragraphs. Then, they added words, which authorized war against England.  Since these social contract laws originate in the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God, these social contract laws must develop the Constitution and all of its amendments. Thus, in 1776, the DOI and the Constitution formed a beautiful system of life and thought.

Unfortunately, the DOI began to fail when Locke's social contract theory was not viewed as a law in the DOI. Other negative actions occur as follows:
(1) Lincoln is assassinated by foreign agents ;
(2) a British economic system replaces the powerful American economic system;
(3) State rights are developed and would destroy Locke's social contract;
(4) trading is expanded and weakens the People and the Union;
(5) big families take control of the U.S. economy with their national banks;
(6) praying in public schools are eliminated by atheists;
(7) a world government is discussed and will eliminate the Constitution;
(8) a poorly ranked science and mathematical education will destroy the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God in Locke's social contract;
(9) the increased nation debts will transform a democracy into an oligarchy;
(10) evolutionary theory will hide an active God.

Today, the real differences between capitalism, communism, and socialism are not understood by many Americans. They will not understand them until they are unified.

Tuesday, October 09, 2012

47f.The Laws of Nature and of Nature's God

Today,  I am saying that  The Declaration of Independence is a Law in the United States of America. This law is defined in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence (DOI).  This law is real and necessary because it must guide the development of the Constitution so that a more perfect Union is formed in the United States.

I also say that the most important words in this law is the phrase, 'the Law of Nature and of Nature's God.'  However, the interpretation of this phrase is unclear because God is unknown.(click)  However, more humans are beginning to understand God.  In this blog, I will help you understand this phrase.

When the DOI was becoming a real possibility in the minds of American colonists, deism stopped growing and theism was weakening on the divinity of Jesus.  Before he died on March 9, 1790, Ben Franklin spoke of doubts about the divinity of Jesus. (See Ben's Chronology in The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin.)  So, I believe that the writings of John Locke and Gottfried Leibniz, in the last years of the 17th century, had developed 'hot thoughts' on the subject of a real active God and an endless universe.

My new book "A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design of an active God" presents an active God and endless universe.  So I say that 'the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God' in the DOI is correct and will move all nations forward.

Why should any person accept capitalism or communism when God is active and human life is continuous? When any person in the U.S. Congress denies the 'Laws of Nature and of Nature's God',' that person must be removed fron the U.S. Governmentt

Monday, October 08, 2012

47e.The Declaration of Independence is a Law That Changes the Constitution.

In 1690, John Locke wrote a book on "Two Treatises of Government." He had studied civil government, found false principles in it, and rejected it. So, in 1690, he proposed a social contract theory that would perfect a nation continually. Essentially, during his studies, Locke  learned that deism was being replaced slowly by theism.  My new book, "A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design od An Active God' is aligned to Locke's social contract theory.

Locke's contract theory became law in the Declaration of Independence (DOI) on July 4, 1776. Locke's social contract theory was drafted by Thomas Jefferson and became law after Jefferson draft was modified by Ben Franklin and John Adams. Thus, the DOI contains laws that express Locke's social contract theory. The DOI also included an authority to go to war against England. For Senator Rockefeller IV to say that the DOI has no laws is an error in thought.

I say that all debates for presidency and Congress must deal continually with the DOI so that new laws can be added to the Constitution in order to form a more perfect Union. These new laws tell us where we are going. Thus, it is time to change the U.S. Congress, the Supreme Court, and the Presidency.  These three branches must learn how to work together.

Since Senator Rockeffeller IV says that the DOI has no laws, I believe that he and his followers in Congress should retire from the U.S. Congress immediately. Members of  Congress, who accept Locke's social contract theory, should continue their work in forming a more perfect Union.

Again, I say that President Obama is moving forward correctly and that candidate Romney will turn the USA into an oligarchy.

Sunday, October 07, 2012

47d. The U.S. Congress Has Destroyed the USA, Which Was Well Defined by the Declaration of Independence.

In a March 26, 2008 letter to me about the Declaration of Independence, John D. Rockefeller IV says,  'While the Declaration of Independence is not considered law in the same sense that the Constitution is considered law,  throughout our nation's history, it has been looked upon by the Supreme Court in order to frame the historical context of legal and constitutional issues.'

The above words from Senator Rockefeller prove that the U.S. Congress destroyed the U.S. Society, which was defined by by John Locke's 'social contract' theory and which became law in the first two paragraphs of the U.S. Declaration of Independence.  I presented these two paragraphs in yesterday's blog.

Locke's social contract theory has two parties,  the Society and the  Government.  The Society has become known as the 'private sector' and is defined by the Declaration of Independence.  And the Government has become known as the 'public sector' and is defined by the Constitution and its amendments.

Obviously, the words of Senator Rockefeller in his letter to me are terrible.  Based on Locke's social contract theory, many laws that have been made by the U.S. Congress must be corrected because the USA is lost as a nation under God.

Politically, the works of President Obama is aligned closely to Locke's social contract theory. But the works of the Democrats and Republicans in Congress are very poor and must be corrected.

Saturday, October 06, 2012

47c John Locke's Social Contract Was Removed Quietly from the USA.

Locke's social contract theory was accepted by the U.S. colonists. They accepted this theory when the Declaration of Independence (DOI) was made on July 4, 1776. Locke's social contract theory was authorized by the words below in the DOI.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. -- That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, -- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.
The remaining words od the DOI  had authorized the U.S .war against England.
Today, members of  U.S. Congress say that the Declaration of Independence never hd laws other than laws of war against England. Thus, the U.S. Congress says that all new laws can come only from the Constitution and Congress. So, Locke's social contract theory has died.  With this death, God is lost. With this loss, atheism is growing. Today, life in the USA is turning to money and away from  God. 

Friday, October 05, 2012

47b. Locke's Book on"The Second Treates of Government) by Thomas P. Peardon of Columbia University

In 1952, Thomas Peardon of Columbia University wrote an Introduction to John Locke's famous 'social contract' theory.  Locke wrote this theory in the "The Second Treatise of Government." Peardon's Introduction became an important writing to many Americans and lawyers of Peardon's period.  I suggest that today's Americans study Peardon's Introduction because the GOP (and Mitt Romney) is rejecting Locke's social contract.  But President Obama is building Locke's social contract.

Locke's social  contract was born during England's famous  Revolution in 1688 and grew with the American Revolution in 1776. In these revolutions, people became free.  But the people limited their freedom because they sought security through a Government.  This security comes from God's laws of nature and limit human freedom by the Government.

Please, add Peardon's writings to your coffee table at home.  Unless Americans study Peardon's Introduction of John Locke's social contract, they cannot vote for their Government correctly. To vote for people, as your parents have voted in the past, voting must changed because our knowledge of God's laws of nature is changing. And God is changing from deism to theism. According,, Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Buddhism, Hindaism, etc will change.

Under an active God today, a person can build a business so that he or she can become 'prosperous.' But when this person dies, economists (CEOs) can take control of this business, that is,  if the CEO will become rich. However, with an active God, people will be reborn.  This person does not know that he or she lived before.  So, this person will grow, with a new Father and Mother. In time, this person must seek a job.  Since this person should be able to find a job in the Romney economy, the person will become poor and  CEOs will become rich.

I say that the Romney economy is ungodly.  But I believe that Obama is currently on the right path of an active God.

Thursday, October 04, 2012

47a. October 3 Debate Between President Obama and Candidate Romney

The October 3, 2012 the debate between President Obama and candidate Romney was surprising. Romney expressed no respect for the Declaration of Independence (DOI) and the Constitution whereas Obama was showing his deep respect for our two founding documents.

Romney's five top major actions would (1) reduce the power of the federal government; (2) give more power to the States; (3) deregulate business and industry; (4) reduce, by five trillion dollars, the taxes of the richest people; and (5) change the ObamaCare system to a voucher system.

On the other hand, Obama five major actions would (1) continue his economic efforts to recover the jobs that were lost by the GOP under President George W. Bush and his unnecessary war costs; (2) increase the number people in the middle class  (3) increase the number of educated young people in mathematics and science; (4) increase the number of small businesses; and (5) to fund these four actions by increasing the taxes of the richest citizens.

I conclude that Obama understands the social contract of the USA.  But Romney does not understand this contract.  If you read 'The Second Treatise of Government' by John Locke, a social contract is formed with an agreement between two political objects ---'Society' and 'Government.' Their relations were defined by the DOI and the Constitution.

Society is thus a nation of people who receive rights from God and then gives some of these godly rights to  Government so that it can secure  the people in many ways. Romney's desire to reduce Government, increasing State rights, or removing ObamaCare from Government is an act against the Society.

If people of the USA allow Romney and the GOP to come to power with Romney's actions, the USA will again become a society of cheap slaves.

Wednesday, October 03, 2012

46f. Netanyahn's 'Red Line' Must Be Drawn

I conclude that the suggested 'Red Line' of Prime Minister Netanyahn of Israel must be drawn in order to limit Iran's Nuclear Program to fission and fusion energy and in order to prevent the development of atom bombs by Iran or any other nation.

This Red Line must be drawn immediately so that fusion energy can be developed for all nations, so  that all fission reactors and all atom bombs can be 'put to bed,' and so that peace can be developed in every nation.

Tuesday, October 02, 2012

46e. Why Fusion Reactors Are Not Developing.

Fission energy, which was studied from1898 to 1945, was finally developed and produced fission reactors and bombs that would stop WWII. But  since fission reactors release dangerous rays into the environment, the development of fusion energy began. Using Einstein's famous equation, E = mc2, scientists started to develop a 'man-made sunshine machine' by converting hydrogen into helium. But this project is huge and costly and might not be completed in this century. (click) 

Scientists that are developing fusion energy do not consider God or God's Intelligent Design of the universe. For instance, I read particle physicists say that 'physical particles can be freed.'  However, I say that only God is free because God  (1) is absolute; (2) is unchanging; (3) is one; (4) is without parts; (5) is existent; (6) is infinite; and (8) cannot be compared with any finite things in the universe.  I also say that a physical particle can be either in 'dark matter' as an indivisible thing or it must be a divisible thing that  functions in the universe. Galileo says that all divisible things have an infinite number of infinitesimal parts. Galileo speaks of these divisible bodies in his 'Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences.'

U.S. economists also do not consider God or God's Intelligent Design.  For instance, I read  U.S. economists say that the USA has an economy called 'free enterprise.' But how can the USA have a free enterprise economy when its God is the only free thing. 

As seen, the symbols and the meaning of symbols in national languages are filled with words and meanings that are wrong  Jesus says that the wrong words and meanings of a national language will defile man's mind. (Mark 7:23)

To make progress on fusion energy, I say that God's Intelligent Design must be considered and understood.

Monday, October 01, 2012

46d. Netanyahn Draws a 'Red Line,' Which Limits Iran's Nuclear Program.

This month, Israel's Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahn, made his case to stop Iran's from building a nuclear bomb. Netanyahn's case is correct for many reasons because the thoughts of Muslim leaders have become outdated recently by my new book.

For example, Iranians do not know that my book is saying that God has no Heaven. Iranians also do not know that every human being will be reborn after death, by a father and mother somewhere in the universe that God made. So, when Hitler murdered Jews with furnaces during WWII, Iranians will not be able to murder Jews and Christian infidels with atom bombs or terrorism.  The crime of murder is impossible because God made every human being immortal.  So, human beings will always receive a new body after death from God.  Only God knows where our new lives begin.

Thus, instead of building atom bombs, all nations must work together to develop the safe fusion reactors, so that all dirty fission reactors can be destroyed.  All existing atom bombs must also be destroyed because my new book 'A New and Modern Holy Bible with the Intelligent Design of An Active God' says that all wars and terrorism will come to an end. (click)